IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joaaec/15290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Issues Of Demand Specification And Industry Structure In Turkeys And Broiler Chickens

Author

Listed:
  • Cheney, Laura Martin
  • Brown, A. Blake
  • Yamano, Takashi
  • Masterovsky, Michael

Abstract

Factors unique to the turkey industry suggest that conclusions concerning market structure and demand specification drawn from aggregate poultry data cannot necessarily be extrapolated to the turkey industry. The Wu-Hausman endogeneity test is used to examine demand specifications and industry structure specifically for turkey meat. In contrast to general poultry, quantity-not price-is found to be predetermined in demand models that use annual turkey data. Quarterly demand analysis suggests this result stems from biological cycles that limit a producer's ability to react to price change and the use of a weighted average for determining price and quantity.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheney, Laura Martin & Brown, A. Blake & Yamano, Takashi & Masterovsky, Michael, 2001. "Issues Of Demand Specification And Industry Structure In Turkeys And Broiler Chickens," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 33(1), pages 1-10, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:15290
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.15290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/15290/files/33010025.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.15290?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thurman, Walter N, 1986. "Endogeneity Testing in a Supply and Demand Framework," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 68(4), pages 638-646, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martinez, Stephen W., 2002. "Vertical Coordination Of Marketing Systems: Lessons From The Poultry, Egg, And Pork Industries," Agricultural Economic Reports 34051, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Doko Tchatoka, Firmin Sabro, 2012. "Specification Tests with Weak and Invalid Instruments," MPRA Paper 40185, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Luke, Jaime R. & Tonsor, Glynn T. & Brown, D. Scott, 2024. "Wholesale pork demand: Understanding primal-level heterogeneity," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    3. Doko Tchatoka, Firmin & Dufour, Jean-Marie, 2020. "Exogeneity tests, incomplete models, weak identification and non-Gaussian distributions: Invariance and finite-sample distributional theory," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 218(2), pages 390-418.
    4. Giancarlo Moschini & Vissa Anuradha, 1993. "Flexible Specification of Mixed Demand Systems," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 75(1), pages 1-9.
    5. Lohr, Luanne & Park, Timothy A., 1992. "Certification And Supply Response In The Organic Lettuce Market," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Carlos Arnade & Fred Kuchler & Linda Calvin, 2016. "The changing role of consumers and suppliers in a food safety event: the 2006 foodborne illness outbreak linked to spinach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(25), pages 2354-2366, May.
    7. Buhr, Brian L., 1993. "A Quarterly Econometric Simulation Model Of The U.S. Livestock And Meat Sector," Staff Papers 13465, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    8. Scheitrum, Daniel Paul & Carter, Colin A. & Jaffe, Amy Myers, 2017. "Testing substitution between private and public storage in the U.S. oil market: A study on the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 483-493.
    9. Eales, James & Veeman, Michele & Fulton, Joan, 1993. "Canadian Demand for Meats," Project Report Series 232377, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    10. Roger A. Dahlgran & Dean G. Fairchild, 2002. "The demand impacts of chicken contamination publicity-a case study," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(4), pages 459-474.
    11. Firmin Doko Tchatoka, 2015. "On bootstrap validity for specification tests with weak instruments," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 18(1), pages 137-146, February.
    12. Chen, Dean T. & Dharmaratne, Gerard, 1990. "Farm Price Determination in Structural Models: Implications of Quantity-Dependent and Price-Dependent Specifications," Research Reports 257906, Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.
    13. Dahlgran, Roger A., 1987. "Complete Flexibility Systems And The Stationarity Of U.S. Meat Demands," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Lee, Young-Jae & Kennedy, P. Lynn, 2013. "Quantity And Exchange Rate Effects On U.S. Trout Prices," 2013 Annual Meeting, February 2-5, 2013, Orlando, Florida 142133, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    15. Kiviet, Jan F. & Pleus, Milan, 2017. "The performance of tests on endogeneity of subsets of explanatory variables scanned by simulation," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 2(C), pages 1-21.
    16. Lee, Young-Jae & Kennedy, P. Lynn, 2008. "An Examination of Inverse Demand Models: An Application to the U.S. Crawfish Industry," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 37(2), pages 1-14.
    17. Firmin Doko Tchatoka & Jean‐Marie Dufour, 2014. "Identification‐robust inference for endogeneity parameters in linear structural models," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 17(1), pages 165-187, February.
    18. Martin, Laura L. & Brown, A. Blake, 1996. "Endogeneity Testing in Turkey Meat Demand," Staff Paper Series 201212, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    19. Zhai, Jun & Kuusela, Olli-Pekka, 2023. "An econometric study of Oregon's log and lumber markets: Estimation of price elasticities using two approaches," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    20. Holloway, Garth J. & Peyton, L. James & Griffith, Garry R., 2000. "Was the Australian Meat and Live-stock Corporation's advertising efficient?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(1), pages 1-27.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:15290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.