IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joaaec/15225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Policy Reform: A Taxonomy Of Economists' Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Shabman, Leonard A.
  • Stephenson, Kurt

Abstract

As the environmental policy recommendations of economists become more acceptable, differences in the professional understanding of, and support for, different policy forms are becoming more apparent. These different approaches to environmental policy and research are described around a taxonomy of four perspectives: "rational analysts," "cost analysts", "market managers," and "free market environmentalists." These perspectives are compared and contrasted. Recognition of these differences can result in a better appreciation of the different research agendas of economists and can improve clarity in teaching and policy advising.

Suggested Citation

  • Shabman, Leonard A. & Stephenson, Kurt, 1996. "Environmental Policy Reform: A Taxonomy Of Economists' Perspectives," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(01), pages 1-9, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:15225
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.15225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/15225/files/28010117.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.15225?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shabman, Leonard A., 1984. "Water Resources Management: Policy Economics For An Era Of Transitions," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(01), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Robert W. Crandall, 1995. "Is There Progress In Environmental Policy?," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 13(1), pages 80-83, January.
    3. Anderson, Terry L., 1982. "The New Resource Economics: Old Ideas And New Applications," 1982 Annual Meeting, August 1-4, Logan, Utah 279161, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Terry L. Anderson, 1982. "The New Resource Economics: Old Ideas and New Applications," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 64(5), pages 928-934.
    5. Anderson, Terry L & Hill, Peter J, 1975. "The Evolution of Property Rights: A Study of the American West," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 18(1), pages 163-179, April.
    6. Charles W. Baird, 1989. "James Buchanan and the Austrians: The Common Ground," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 201-230, Spring/Su.
    7. Terry L. Anderson, 1982. "The New Resource Economics: Old Ideas and New Applications," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(5), pages 928-934, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Batie, Sandra S., 2005. "The Demand for Economic Policy Analysis: Is Anyone Listening?," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 34(2), pages 1-8, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Batie, Sandra S., 1984. "Alternative Views of Property Rights: Implication for Natural Resource Allocation," 1984 Annual Meeting, August 5-8, Ithaca, New York 278946, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Buchs, Arnaud & Petit, Olivier & Roman, Philippe, 2020. "Can social ecological economics of water reinforce the “big tent”?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Pope, C. Arden III, 1989. "Alternative Opportunities for Allocating the Public Rangeland Resource," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 244844, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    4. Randall, Alan, 1985. "Methodology, Id Ogy And The Economics Of Policy: Why Resource Economists Disagree," 1985 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Ames, Iowa 278505, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Gilles Grolleau & Deborah Peterson, 2015. "Biodiversity conservation through private initiative: the case of Earth Sanctuaries Ltd," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 293-312, October.
    6. Lawrence W. C. Lai & Winky K. O. Ho, 2001. "A Probit Analysis of Development Control: A Hong Kong Case Study of Residential Zones," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(13), pages 2425-2437, December.
    7. Gardner, B. Delworth, 1985. "Information, Incentives, And Property Rights: The Emergence Of An Alternative Paradigm," 1985 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Ames, Iowa 278541, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Randhir, Timothy O. & Lee, John G., 1996. "Managing local commons in developing economies: an institutional approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Jouravlev, Andrei & Lee, Terence R., 1998. "Prices, property and markets in water allocation," Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo 5735, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    10. Mulkey, David, 1984. "Natural Resource Economics: Alternative Analytical Frameworks and Implications for Extension Programs," 1984 Annual Meeting, August 5-8, Ithaca, New York 337388, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. Bromley, Daniel W., 1984. "Property Rights and Economic Incentives in Resource and Environmental Systems," Staff Papers 200436, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    12. Lawrence W C Lai & Winky K O Ho, 2001. "Small is Beautiful: A Probit Analysis of Development Control of Small Houses in Hong Kong," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 28(4), pages 611-622, August.
    13. Benito Arruñada & Marco Fabbri & Michael Faure, 2022. "Land Titling and Litigation," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 65(1), pages 131-156.
    14. Meina Cai & Ilia Murtazashvili & Jennifer Murtazashvili & Raufhon Salahodjaev, 2020. "Individualism and governance of the commons," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 175-195, July.
    15. Leeson, Peter T. & Harris, Colin, 2018. "Wealth-destroying private property rights," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 1-9.
    16. John Boyce & David Bruner, 2012. "Property rights out of anarchy? The Demsetz hypothesis in a game of conflict," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 95-120, June.
    17. Barbier,Edward B., 2007. "Natural Resources and Economic Development," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521706513.
    18. Peter T. Leeson & Colin Harris, 2018. "Testing rational choice theories of institutional change," Rationality and Society, , vol. 30(4), pages 420-431, November.
    19. Marciano, Alain, 2011. "Buchanan on externalities: An exercise in applied subjectivism," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 280-289.
    20. Mwangi, Esther, 2007. "Subdividing the Commons: Distributional Conflict in the Transition from Collective to Individual Property Rights in Kenya's Maasailand," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 815-834, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joaaec:15225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.