IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envirb/v28y2001i4p611-622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Small is Beautiful: A Probit Analysis of Development Control of Small Houses in Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence W C Lai
  • Winky K O Ho

Abstract

In this paper we apply the probit model, an econometric technique that has been used in urban economics to examine nonaggregate cross-sectional data, to investigate the development control (planning application) data regarding the so-called ‘small houses’ in Hong Kong with respect to two classes of statutory zones, namely the ‘green belt’ and ‘unspecified uses’ zones. Four refutable hypotheses relating to the scale of the development, exogenous policies, and internal planning guidelines confronting the planning permission mechanism are tested by using a probit model adapted for the purpose. The data set with 826 individual observations over a period of 24 years from 1975 is part of the first systematically collected and unpublished planning statistics data set for Hong Kong. Although the hypotheses are specific to Hong Kong, they can be easily adapted, where nonaggregate planning statistics are available, to evaluate three general issues: rent seeking, the dependence of planning decisions on announced policies, and the spatial variation in success rates of planning applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence W C Lai & Winky K O Ho, 2001. "Small is Beautiful: A Probit Analysis of Development Control of Small Houses in Hong Kong," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 28(4), pages 611-622, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:28:y:2001:i:4:p:611-622
    DOI: 10.1068/b2770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/b2770
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1068/b2770?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stull, William J, 1975. "Community Environment, Zoning, and the Market Value of Single-Family Homes," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 18(2), pages 535-557, October.
    2. Goodman, Allen C., 1988. "An econometric model of housing price, permanent income, tenure choice, and housing demand," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 327-353, May.
    3. Lee, Lung-Fei & Trost, Robert P., 1978. "Estimation of some limited dependent variable models with application to housing demand," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 357-382, December.
    4. Maser, Steven M & Riker, William H & Rosett, Richard N, 1977. "The Effects of Zoning and Externalities on the Price of Land: An Empirical Analysis of Monroe County, New York," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 20(1), pages 111-132, April.
    5. Lafferty, Ronald N & Frech, H E, III, 1978. "Community Environment and the Market Value of Single-Family Homes: The Effect of the Dispersion of Land Uses," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 21(2), pages 381-394, October.
    6. Glen Bramley, 1993. "The Impact of Land Use Planning and Tax Subsidies on the Supply and Price of Housing in Britain," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 30(1), pages 5-30, February.
    7. Anderson, Terry L., 1982. "The New Resource Economics: Old Ideas And New Applications," 1982 Annual Meeting, August 1-4, Logan, Utah 279161, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Terry L. Anderson, 1982. "The New Resource Economics: Old Ideas and New Applications," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 64(5), pages 928-934.
    9. Paul Cheshire & Stephen Sheppard, 1989. "British Planning Policy and Access to Housing: Some Empirical Estimates," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 26(5), pages 469-485, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lawrence W. C. Lai & Winky K. O. Ho, 2001. "A Probit Analysis of Development Control: A Hong Kong Case Study of Residential Zones," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(13), pages 2425-2437, December.
    2. J.M. Pogodzinski & Tim R. Sass, 1991. "Measuring the Effects of Municipal Zoning Regulations: A Survey," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 28(4), pages 597-621, August.
    3. James D. Burnell, 1985. "Industrial Land Use, Externalities, and Residential Location," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 22(5), pages 399-408, October.
    4. Lawrence W C Lai & Kwong Wing Chau & Edward C Y Yiu & Kelvin S K Wong & Wah Sang Wong & Pearl Y L Chan, 2007. "Measuring and Interpreting the Effects of a Public-Sector-Led Urban Renewal Project on Housing Prices—An Empirical Study of a Comprehensive Development Area Zone Developed upon ‘Taking’ in Hong ," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 34(3), pages 524-538, June.
    5. Stephen Mak & Lennon Choy & Winky Ho, 2012. "Region-specific Estimates of the Determinants of Real Estate Investment in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(4), pages 741-755, March.
    6. Alan W. Evans, 1996. "The Impact of Land Use Planning and Tax Subsidies on the Supply and Price of Housing in Britain: A Comment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(3), pages 581-585, April.
    7. Justo Manrique & Kalu Ojah, 2003. "The demand for housing in Spain: an endogenous switching regression analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 323-336.
    8. Rapaport, Carol, 1997. "Housing Demand and Community Choice: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 243-260, September.
    9. Edwin Van Gameren & Michiel Ras & Evelien Eggink & Ingrid Ooms, 2005. "The demand for housing services in the Netherlands," ERSA conference papers ersa05p327, European Regional Science Association.
    10. Pope, C. Arden III, 1989. "Alternative Opportunities for Allocating the Public Rangeland Resource," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 244844, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    11. Murtazashvili, Irina & Wooldridge, Jeffrey M., 2016. "A control function approach to estimating switching regression models with endogenous explanatory variables and endogenous switching," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 190(2), pages 252-266.
    12. Cheshire, Paul & Sheppard, Stephen, 2002. "The welfare economics of land use planning," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 242-269, September.
    13. Bernard H. Siegan, 1990. "Land Use Regulations Should Preserve Only Vital and Pressing Governmental Interests," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 10(1), pages 127-158, Spring/Su.
    14. Jonathan Halket & Lars Nesheim & Florian Oswald, 2020. "The Housing Stock, Housing Prices, And User Costs: The Roles Of Location, Structure, And Unobserved Quality," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 61(4), pages 1777-1814, November.
    15. Shabman, Leonard & Stephenson, Kurt, 1996. "Environmental Policy Reform: A Taxonomy of Economists' Perspectives," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 117-125, July.
    16. M. Colom & M. Molés, 2013. "Housing and labor decisions of households," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 55-82, March.
    17. Lawrence W.C. Lai & Winky K.O. Ho, 2002. "An econometric study of the decisions of a town planning authority: complementary & substitute uses of industrial activities in Hong Kong," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(3), pages 127-135.
    18. Gilles Grolleau & Deborah Peterson, 2015. "Biodiversity conservation through private initiative: the case of Earth Sanctuaries Ltd," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 293-312, October.
    19. Lawrence W C Lai & Winky K O Ho, 2001. "Zone Separation: A Probit Analysis of Hong Kong Planning Application Statistics," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 28(6), pages 923-932, December.
    20. S Monk & B J Pearce & C M E Whitehead, 1996. "Land-Use Planning, Land Supply, and House Prices," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 28(3), pages 495-511, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envirb:v:28:y:2001:i:4:p:611-622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.