IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jloagb/14699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International Trade And The Future Of American Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Gardner, Bruce L.

Abstract

American farmers have gained substantially from agricultural trade, despite the competition posed for producers of imported commodities. Because of U.S. comparative advantage in most agricultural products, the farm sector would be smaller and farmers would be poorer with reduced trade. Evidence indicates that in the 1990s, each dollar of additional export sales is worth about 40 cents in additional net farm income. Two crucial elements in future export growth are continued productivity gains and further reductions in barriers to agricultural trade around the world. The two are linked in farm income determination, in that elastic demand is important for productivity gains to translate to farm income growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Gardner, Bruce L., 2000. "International Trade And The Future Of American Agriculture," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jloagb:14699
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.14699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/14699/files/18010027.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.14699?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gay Y. Miller & Joseph M. Rosenblatt & Leroy J. Hushak, 1988. "The Effects of Supply Shifts on Producers' Surplus," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(4), pages 886-891.
    2. R. K. Lindner & F. G. Jarrett, 1978. "Supply Shifts and the Size of Research Benefits," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 60(1), pages 48-58.
    3. W. E. Diewert, 1981. "The Comparative Statics of Industry Long-Run Equilibrium," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 14(1), pages 78-92, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gardner, Bruce L., 1992. "Price Supports and Optimal Spending on Agricultural Research," Working Papers 197793, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    2. John D. Mullen & Julian M. Alston & Michael K. Wohlgenant, 1989. "The Impact Of Farm And Processing Research On The Australian Wool Industry," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 33(1), pages 32-47, April.
    3. Alston, Julian M., 1991. "Research Benefits in a Multimarket Setting: A Review," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(01), pages 1-30, April.
    4. J. M. Alston & J. D. Mullen, 1992. "Economic Effects Of Research Into Traded Goods: The Case Of Australian Wool," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 268-278, May.
    5. David S Bullock & Marion Desquilbet & Klaus Salhofer & . American Agricultural Economics Association, 2000. "Economic effects of European GMO Labeling policy," Post-Print hal-02306126, HAL.
    6. Alston, Julian M. & Freebairn, John W. & James, Jennifer S., 2004. "Levy-funded research choices by producers and society," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(1), pages 1-32.
    7. Edwards, Geoff W. & Freebairn, John W., 1982. "The Social Benefits from an Increase in Productivity in a Part of an Industry," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(02), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Brennan, John P. & Bantilan, Ma Cynthia S., 1999. "Impact of ICRISAT Research on Australian Agriculture," Research Reports 28006, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    9. David T. Vere & Randall E. Jones & Garry R. Griffith, 2003. "Economic benefits of public investment in weed management: the case of vulpia in south‐eastern Australia's temperate pasture areas," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 47(4), pages 519-539, December.
    10. Parton, Kevin A. & O'Brien, Melissa J., 2013. "A Farm-Level Approach to Examining Supply Shifts and Research Benefits," 1992 Conference (36th), February 10-13, 1992, Canberra, Australia 147088, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    11. Vernon Ruttan, 1980. "Bureaucratic productivity: The case of agricultural research," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 529-547, January.
    12. Kutschukian, Jean-Marc, 2008. "A Framework For The Economic Evaluation Of Environmental Science," 2008 Conference (52nd), February 5-8, 2008, Canberra, Australia 6026, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    13. Karls, Michael A. & Horowitz, John B. & Sesmero, Juan & Van Cott, T. norman, 2013. "Innovation, Parallel Shifts of Supply, and Welfare," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 14(1), pages 1-8.
    14. Parker, Douglas D. & Zilberman, David, 1994. "The Distributional Effects Of Private Sector R&D Management: In-House And At Public Institutions," 1994 Annual Meeting, August 7-10, San Diego, California 271415, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. McVey, Marty Jay, 1996. "Valuing quality differentiated grains from a total logistics perspective," ISU General Staff Papers 1996010108000012326, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    16. Sureshwaran, Suresh & Thompson, C. Stassen & Henry, Mark S. & Loyd, M.I., 1990. "Economic Surplus And The Distributional Consequences Of Deregulating Tobacco Production," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(2), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Salayo, Nerissa D., 2000. "Investment Opportunities for the Shrimp Processing Industry in the Philippines: Results from a Hedonic Analysis," Discussion Papers DP 2000-12, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    18. Hertel, By Thomas W. & Baldos, Uris L.C. & Fuglie, Keith O., 2020. "Trade in technology: A potential solution to the food security challenges of the 21st century," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    19. Byerlee, Derek R. & Anderson, Jock R., 1982. "Risk, Utility and the Value of Information in Farmer Decision Making," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(03), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Pannell, D. J., 1999. "On the estimation of on-farm benefits of agricultural research," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 123-134, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jloagb:14699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaggea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.