IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/inseej/343105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Socio-metabolic Studies are Central to Ecological Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Singh, Simron J
  • Talwar, Simran
  • Shenoy, Megha

Abstract

Global material extraction has tripled since the 1970s, with more than 100 billion tonnes of materials entering the world economy each year. Only 8.6% of this amount is recycled, while 61% ends up as waste and emissions, the leading cause of global warming and large-scale pollution of land, rivers, and oceans. This theme paper introduces socio-metabolic research (SMR) and demonstrates its relevance to ecological economics scholarship in India. SMR is a research framework for studying the biophysical stocks and flows of materials and energy associated with societal production and consumption. As one of the core approaches in industrial ecology and ecological economics, SMR is widely conducted in Europe, the United States, Japan, Australia, and China. In India, it is still in its infancy. In this paper, we review pioneering efforts in SMR in India and make a case for advancing the field in the subcontinent.

Suggested Citation

  • Singh, Simron J & Talwar, Simran & Shenoy, Megha, 2021. "Why Socio-metabolic Studies are Central to Ecological Economics," Ecology, Economy and Society - the INSEE Journal, Indian Society of Ecological Economics (INSEE), vol. 4(02), July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:inseej:343105
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.343105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/343105/files/Why%20Socio-metabolic%20Studies%20are%20Central%20to%20Ecological%20Economics.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.343105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mutha, Nitin H. & Patel, Martin & Premnath, V., 2006. "Plastics materials flow analysis for India," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 222-244.
    2. William F. Lamb & Julia K. Steinberger, 2017. "Human well‐being and climate change mitigation," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(6), November.
    3. John A. Mathews & Hao Tan, 2011. "Progress Toward a Circular Economy in China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 15(3), pages 435-457, June.
    4. Bain, Ariana & Shenoy, Megha & Ashton, Weslynne & Chertow, Marian, 2010. "Industrial symbiosis and waste recovery in an Indian industrial area," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1278-1287.
    5. Melgar-Melgar, Rigo E. & Hall, Charles A.S., 2020. "Why ecological economics needs to return to its roots: The biophysical foundation of socio-economic systems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    6. Schaffartzik, Anke & Duro, Juan Antonio & Krausmann, Fridolin, 2019. "Global appropriation of resources causes high international material inequality – Growth is not the solution," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 9-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nandy, Biplob & Sharma, Gaurav & Garg, Saryu & Kumari, Shweta & George, Tess & Sunanda, Yengkhom & Sinha, Bärbel, 2015. "Recovery of consumer waste in India – A mass flow analysis for paper, plastic and glass and the contribution of households and the informal sector," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 167-181.
    2. Jacopo Zotti & Andrea Bigano, 2019. "Write circular economy, read economy’s circularity. How to avoid going in circles," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 36(2), pages 629-652, July.
    3. Wei, Aiping & Zakari, Abdulrasheed & Tawiah, Vincent & Aleesa, Noha, 2024. "Cultivating resilient economies through responsible mineral resource trade: Does eco-resourcing rebate matter?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Tianqun Xu & Ping Gao & Qian Yu & Debin Fang, 2017. "An Improved Eco-Efficiency Analysis Framework Based on Slacks-Based Measure Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Millar, Neal & McLaughlin, Eoin & Börger, Tobias, 2019. "The Circular Economy: Swings and Roundabouts?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 11-19.
    6. Bain, Ariana & Shenoy, Megha & Ashton, Weslynne & Chertow, Marian, 2010. "Industrial symbiosis and waste recovery in an Indian industrial area," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1278-1287.
    7. Wu, Hua-qing & Shi, Yan & Xia, Qiong & Zhu, Wei-dong, 2014. "Effectiveness of the policy of circular economy in China: A DEA-based analysis for the period of 11th five-year-plan," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 163-175.
    8. Davide Aloini & Riccardo Dulmin & Valeria Mininno & Alessandro Stefanini & Pierluigi Zerbino, 2020. "Driving the Transition to a Circular Economic Model: A Systematic Review on Drivers and Critical Success Factors in Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-14, December.
    9. John Sherwood & Michael Carbajales-Dale & Becky Roselius Haney, 2020. "Putting the Biophysical (Back) in Economics: A Taxonomic Review of Modeling the Earth-Bound Economy," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Ziheng Niu & Jianliang Xiong & Xuesong Ding & Yao Wu, 2022. "Analysis of China’s Carbon Peak Achievement in 2025," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Antonello Monsù Scolaro & Stefania De Medici, 2021. "Downcycling and Upcycling in Rehabilitation and Adaptive Reuse of Pre-Existing Buildings: Re-Designing Technological Performances in an Environmental Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Kish, K. & Mallery, D. & Yahya Haage, G. & Melgar-Melgar, R. & Burke, M. & Orr, C. & Smolyar, N.L. & Sanniti, S. & Larson, J., 2021. "Fostering critical pluralism with systems theory, methods, and heuristics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    13. Christos Makriyannis, 2023. "How the Biophysical Paradigm Impedes the Scientific Advancement of Ecological Economics: A Transdisciplinary Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-24, November.
    14. Qingyu Zhang & Aman Ullah & Sana Ashraf & Muhammad Abdullah, 2024. "Synergistic Impact of Internet of Things and Big-Data-Driven Supply Chain on Sustainable Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Beatriz de Souza Mello Gonçalves & Flávio Leonel de Carvalho & Paula de Camargo Fiorini, 2022. "Circular Economy and Financial Aspects: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-41, March.
    16. Lena Kilian & Anne Owen & Andy Newing & Diana Ivanova, 2022. "Exploring Transport Consumption-Based Emissions: Spatial Patterns, Social Factors, Well-Being, and Policy Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-26, September.
    17. Alvarado, Rafael & Tillaguango, Brayan & López-Sánchez, Michelle & Ponce, Pablo & Işık, Cem, 2021. "Heterogeneous impact of natural resources on income inequality: The role of the shadow economy and human capital index," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 690-704.
    18. Salvador Peniche Camps & Charles A. S. Hall & Kent Klitgaard, 2020. "Biophysical Economics for Policy and Teaching: Mexico as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Doryn Negesa & Wei Cong & Lei Cheng & Lei Shi, 2022. "Development of eco‐industrial parks in Ethiopia: The case of Hawassa Industrial Park," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 1078-1093, June.
    20. David Hidalgo-Carvajal & Ruth Carrasco-Gallego & Gustavo Morales-Alonso, 2021. "From Goods to Services and from Linear to Circular: The Role of Servitization’s Challenges and Drivers in the Shifting Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:inseej:343105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inseeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.