IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijfaec/244285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Welfare Implications Of Timberland Ownership Changes In The U.S. Timber Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Rahman, Mohammad Mahfuzur
  • Munn, Ian Alexander
  • Sun, Changyou

Abstract

n the last two decades, many forest product firms in the U.S. either divested their timberlands to timber investment management organizations (TIMOs) and conservation organizations or converted their corporate structures from C corporations to real estate investment trusts (REITs). All landowners sold smaller timberland tracts for nonforestry uses. Reduced timber supplies from conservation organizations and timberland loss to other nonforestry uses have consequences on producer and consumer surpluses in the U.S. timber markets. Equilibrium displacement model has been employed to evaluate the welfare changes in U.S. timber markets attributed to timberland ownership changes. Net reduction of timber supply contributed to the reduction of social surplus by $43 million in 2006. Compared to the $33 billion plus U.S. timber markets, this welfare reduction was small. Overall, this article explains the shifts of economic surpluses among producers and net surplus reduction for the society attributed to timberland ownership changes in the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahman, Mohammad Mahfuzur & Munn, Ian Alexander & Sun, Changyou, 2016. "Welfare Implications Of Timberland Ownership Changes In The U.S. Timber Markets," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 4(3), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijfaec:244285
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.244285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/244285/files/vol4.no3.pp33.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.244285?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buongiorno, Joseph, 1996. "Forest sector modeling: a synthesis of econometrics, mathematical programming, and system dynamics methods," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 329-343, September.
    2. David H. Newman & David N. Wear, 1993. "Production Economics of Private Forestry: A Comparison of Industrial and Nonindustrial Forest Owners," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 75(3), pages 674-684.
    3. Roy Boyd & Barbara J. Daniels, 1985. "Capital Gains Treatment of Timber Income: Incidence and Welfare Implications," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 64(4), pages 354-362.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hurmekoski, Elias & Hetemäki, Lauri, 2013. "Studying the future of the forest sector: Review and implications for long-term outlook studies," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 17-29.
    2. Ryan, Mary & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Hynes, Stephen, 2018. "Heterogeneous economic and behavioural drivers of the Farm afforestation decision," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 63-74.
    3. Shumway, C. Richard, 1995. "Recent Duality Contributions In Production Economics," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 20(01), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Zhang, Xufang & Sun, Changyou & Munn, Ian A. & Gordon, Jason, 2021. "How to protect the U.S. forest products industry from the perspective of trade? A comparison of policies within the forest supply chain," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    5. Mathieu, Valentin & Roda, Jean-Marc, 2023. "A meta-analysis on wood trade flow modeling concepts," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    6. Mäntymaa, Erkki & Juutinen, Artti & Tyrväinen, Liisa & Karhu, Jouni & Kurttila, Mikko, 2018. "Participation and compensation claims in voluntary forest landscape conservation: The case of the Ruka-Kuusamo tourism area, Finland," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 14-24.
    7. Beach, Robert H. & Pattanayak, Subhrendu K. & Yang, Jui-Chen & Murray, Brian C. & Abt, Robert C., 2005. "Econometric studies of non-industrial private forest management: a review and synthesis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 261-281, March.
    8. Michael, Jeffrey A., 1998. "Preemptive Habitat Destruction And The Endangered Species Act: The Case Of The Red-Cockaded Woodpecker," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20783, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Robert Perlack, Robert & Eaton, Lawrence & Thurhollow, Anthony & Langholtz, Matt & De La Torre Ugarte, Daniel, 2011. "US billion-ton update: biomass supply for a bioenergy and bioproducts industry," MPRA Paper 89324, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2011.
    10. Josset, Clement & Shanafelt, David W. & Abildtrup, Jens & Stenger, Anne, 2023. "Probabilistic typology of private forest owners: A tool to target the development of new market for ecosystem services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    11. Min, Shi & Bai, Junfei & Wang, Xiaobing & Waibel, Hermann, 2024. "Does an inconsistent land tenure certificate affect technical efficiency of smallholder rubber farming: Evidence from a panel data in Southwest China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    12. Joshi, Sudiksha & Arano, Kathryn G., 2009. "Determinants of private forest management decisions: A study on West Virginia NIPF landowners," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 132-139, March.
    13. Swallow, Stephen K., 1996. "Economic Issues in Ecosystem Management: An Introduction and Overview," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(2), pages 83-100, October.
    14. Fortney, Jennifer & Arano, Kathryn G. & Jacobson, Michael, 2011. "An evaluation of West Virginia's Managed Timberland Tax Incentive Program," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 69-78, January.
    15. Marielle Brunette & Stephane Couture, 2018. "Risk management activities of a non-industrial privateforest owner with a bivariate utility function," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 99(3-4), pages 281-302.
    16. Liu, Bingcai & Sohngen, Brent, 2020. "Modeling and predicting forest movement: An analysis of timber market and climate change," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304335, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Jåstad, Eirik Ogner & Mustapha, Walid Fayez & Bolkesjø, Torjus Folsland & Trømborg, Erik & Solberg, Birger, 2018. "Modelling of uncertainty in the economic development of the Norwegian forest sector," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 106-115.
    18. Hussain, Anwar & Munn, Ian A. & Loden, Emily K. & Grado, Stephen C. & Jones, Daryl W., 2005. "Factors Influencing Lease Revenue and Non-industrial Landowners' Willingness to allow Hunting Access," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19326, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Cai, Zhen & Narine, Lana Landra & D'Amato, Anthony & Aguilar, Francisco Xavier, 2016. "Attitudinal and revenue effects on non-industrial private forest owners' willingness-to-harvest timber and woody biomass," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 52-61.
    20. Patrice Loisel & Marielle Brunette & Stéphane Couture, 2020. "Insurance and Forest Rotation Decisions Under Storm Risk," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(2), pages 347-367, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijfaec:244285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iiaaktr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.