IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijameu/329822.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New entrants and succession into farming: A Northern Ireland perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jack, Claire
  • Miller, Ana Corina
  • Ashfield, Austen
  • Anderson, Duncan

Abstract

Traditionally, family-farm businesses have been passed down through a number of generations and the facilitation of a smooth transition from one generation to another is central to the profitability, continuity and sustainability of the business. There are many factors which can impact on an individual beginning to manage a farm in their own right. This study seeks to determine the barriers to new entrant farmers in Northern Ireland through a survey of young farmers/new entrants to farming. The results from the survey show that the profitability of the farm business, the age of the farmer when they identify a successor, the stage in the household lifecycle when a successor is identified, the wider dynamics of the family household and the role of the wider rural economy affect the success of new entrants to farming.

Suggested Citation

  • Jack, Claire & Miller, Ana Corina & Ashfield, Austen & Anderson, Duncan, 2019. "New entrants and succession into farming: A Northern Ireland perspective," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 8(2), August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijameu:329822
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.329822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/329822/files/doi_10.5836_ijam_2020-08-56.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.329822?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davis, John & Caskie, Paul & Wallace, Michael, 2013. "Promoting structural adjustment in agriculture: The economics of New Entrant Schemes for farmers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 90-96.
    2. Carlos Benavides-Velasco & Cristina Quintana-García & Vanesa Guzmán-Parra, 2013. "Trends in family business research," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 41-57, January.
    3. Joan Moss & Claire Jack & Michael Wallace, 2004. "Employment Location and Associated Commuting Patterns for Individuals in Disadvantaged Rural Areas in Northern Ireland," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 121-136.
    4. Thia C. Hennessy & Tahir Rehman, 2007. "An Investigation into Factors Affecting the Occupational Choices of Nominated Farm Heirs in Ireland," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 61-75, February.
    5. Elisabeth Deutskens & Ko de Ruyter & Martin Wetzels & Paul Oosterveld, 2004. "Response Rate and Response Quality of Internet-Based Surveys: An Experimental Study," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 21-36, February.
    6. Peter S. Davis & Paula D. Harveston, 1998. "The Influence of Family on the Family Business Succession Process: a Multi-Generational Perspective," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 22(3), pages 31-53, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claire Jack & Austen Ashfield & Adewale Henry Adenuga & Conall Mullan, 2021. "Farm Diversification: Drivers, Barriers and Future Growth Potential," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 20(2), pages 70-75, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleš Kubíček & Ondřej Machek, 2019. "Gender-related factors in family business succession: a systematic literature review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 963-1002, November.
    2. Pessotto, Ana Paula & Costa, Carlos & Schwinghamer, Timothy & Colle, Gabriel & Corte, Vitor Francisco Dalla, 2019. "Factors influencing intergenerational succession in family farm businesses in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    3. Banovic, Marija & Duesberg, Stefanie & Renwick, Alan & Keane, Mark & Bogue, Pat, 2015. "The Field: Land mobility measures as seen through the eyes of Irish farmers," 89th Annual Conference, April 13-15, 2015, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 204200, Agricultural Economics Society.
    4. Van Gils, Anita & Huybrechts, Jolien & Minola, Tommaso & Cassia, Lucio, 2019. "Unraveling the impact of family antecedents on family firm image: A serial multiple-mediation model," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 17-27.
    5. Lee, Soo-Hoon & Phan, Phillip H. & Ding, Hung-bin, 2016. "A theory of family employee involvement during resource paucity," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 160-166.
    6. Reilly, Timothy M. & Jones, Raymond, 2017. "Mixed methodology in family business research: Past accomplishments and perspectives for the future," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 185-195.
    7. Caihua Xu & Qian Wang & Shah Fahad & Masaru Kagatsume & Jin Yu, 2022. "Impact of Off-Farm Employment on Farmland Transfer: Insight on the Mediating Role of Agricultural Production Service Outsourcing," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Srinivasan, V. Seenu & Netzer, Oded, 2007. "Adaptive Self-Explication of Multi-attribute Preferences," Research Papers 1979, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    9. Boris Rumanko & Zuzana Lušňáková & Monika Moravanská & Mária Šajbidorová, 2021. "Succession as a Risk Process in the Survival of a Family Business—Case of Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Nicolas Classen & Martin Carree & Anita Gils & Bettina Peters, 2014. "Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: an exploratory analysis," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 595-609, March.
    11. Mikel Alayo & Txomin Iturralde & Amaia Maseda & Gloria Aparicio, 2021. "Mapping family firm internationalization research: bibliometric and literature review," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 1517-1560, August.
    12. Tatsushi Fukaya & Masayuki Suzuki & Ikumi Ozawa & Takumi Nakagoshi, 2022. "An Examination of Related Factors of Mathematical Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Elementary School Teachers: Focusing on Conceptions of Teaching and Learning and Test Utilization Strategy," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, October.
    13. Peter Jaskiewicz & Katharina Heinrichs & Sabine B. Rau & Trish Reay, 2016. "To Be or Not to Be: How Family Firms Manage Family and Commercial Logics in Succession," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 40(4), pages 781-813, July.
    14. Jasper Brinkerink, 2023. "When Shooting for the Stars Becomes Aiming for Asterisks: P-Hacking in Family Business Research," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(2), pages 304-343, March.
    15. V. D. Procher & D. Urbig & C. Volkmann, 2013. "Time to BRIC it? Internationalization of European family firms in Europe, North America and the BRIC countries," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(16), pages 1466-1471, November.
    16. Jie Yang & Jieqiong Ma & Hongxin Zhao & Jim Cater & Mark Arnold, 2019. "Family involvement, environmental turbulence, and R&D investment: evidence from Listed Chinese SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 1017-1032, December.
    17. Dumitru ZAIȚ, 2015. "Methodological Options In Economic And Management Research," CrossCultural Management Journal, Fundația Română pentru Inteligența Afacerii, Editorial Department, issue 1, pages 59-67, June.
    18. Sudhir Kumar Jain & Nalin Jain, 2014. "Business Succession Planning in Indian MSM-FOBEs: A Study Based on Managerial-Role Employees," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 15(3), pages 517-530, September.
    19. Maikel Schwerdtfeger & Ruben L. Bach, 2024. "How does broadband supply affect participation in panel surveys?: Using geospatial broadband data at the district level to analyze mode choice and panel attrition," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(6), pages 5805-5828, December.
    20. Andrea GANZAROLI & Gianluca FISCATO & Luciano PILOTTI, 2006. "Does business succession enhance firms’ innovation capacity? Results from an exploratory analysis in Italian SMEs," Departmental Working Papers 2006-29, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijameu:329822. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.