IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijag24/344909.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selected factors of plant and animal organic agricultural production in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Lukiewska, Katarzyna
  • Chrobocinska, Katarzyna

Abstract

The assumptions of the European Green Deal include a provision assuming that by 2030, 25% of agricultural land in the European Union (EU) should be covered by organic production. Statistical data indicate that by 2020, the area of ​​organic cropland in EU countries increased, which was partly due to the increase in demand for organic food. Nevertheless, various conditions after 2020 led to a change in the situation of organic farming in the EU. The aim of the study was to assess selected factors of plant and animal organic agricultural production in selected EU countries. The research used comparative analysis and the monographic method, and the analysis included data provided by the European Commission from 2015–2020. The research results showed that the largest area of ​​organic crops among EU countries was characterized by France, Spain and Italy, respectively. France stood out from the other countries analyzed in terms of the size of the organic area of ​​cereals, green plants and fruits, as well as the size of the poultry, pig and cattle population. In Germany, a particularly large area of ​​cereals and a high number of dairy cows and cattle with an organic certificate were noted. It was also found that, taking into account the size and possibilities of EU countries, the potential for organic food production is in most cases unused, and a significant share of organic farming in total agriculture was noted only in Austria. The study supplements the literature on the subject and fills the cognitive gap in the scope of current data and enables the assessment of the use of potential development opportunities in relation to organic farming in the EU. Recognizing current trends in individual directions of organic agricultural production can help decision-makers in creating an effective strategy that is more of an application than theoretical nature. In addition, the issues presented in the article can inspire managers and managers of agricultural production in the decision-making process focused on the optimal allocation of resources, which can contribute to the improvement of the natural environment and the quality of life in rural areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Lukiewska, Katarzyna & Chrobocinska, Katarzyna, 2024. "Selected factors of plant and animal organic agricultural production in the European Union," International Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technology (IJAGST), SvedbergOpen, vol. 201(4), February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijag24:344909
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.344909
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/344909/files/1_Lukiewska_Chrobocinska.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.344909?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruiz de Maya, Salvador & López-López, Inés & Munuera, José Luis, 2011. "Organic food consumption in Europe: International segmentation based on value system differences," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(10), pages 1767-1775, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moons, Ingrid & Barbarossa, Camilla & De Pelsmacker, Patrick, 2018. "The Determinants of the Adoption Intention of Eco-friendly Functional Food in Different Market Segments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 151-161.
    2. Xuhui Wang & Frida Pacho & Jia Liu & Redempta Kajungiro, 2019. "Factors Influencing Organic Food Purchase Intention in Developing Countries and the Moderating Role of Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Nornajihah Nadia Hasbullah & Zuraidah Sulaiman & Adaviah Mas’od & Hanis Syuhada Ahmad Sugiran, 2022. "Drivers of Sustainable Apparel Purchase Intention: An Empirical Study of Malaysian Millennial Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Robert Bumbac, 2019. "The European Food Market €“ Increased Consumer Preference Towards Convenience And Healthy Food," Junior Scientific Researcher, SC Research Publishing SRL, vol. 5(2), pages 53-61, November.
    5. Le Van Huy & Mai Thi Thao Chi & Antonio Lobo & Ninh Nguyen & Phan Hoang Long, 2019. "Effective Segmentation of Organic Food Consumers in Vietnam Using Food-Related Lifestyles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Barbarossa, Camilla & De Pelsmacker, Patrick & Moons, Ingrid, 2017. "Personal Values, Green Self-identity and Electric Car Adoption," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 190-200.
    7. Minton, Elizabeth A. & Spielmann, Nathalie & Kahle, Lynn R. & Kim, Chung-Hyun, 2018. "The subjective norms of sustainable consumption: A cross-cultural exploration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 400-408.
    8. Adam Czudec, 2022. "The Altruistic Behaviour of Consumers Who Prefer a Local Origin of Organic Food," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, April.
    9. Hansen, Torben & Sørensen, Maria Ingerslev & Eriksen, Marie-Louise Riewerts, 2018. "How the interplay between consumer motivations and values influences organic food identity and behavior," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 39-52.
    10. Kim, Seon-Woong & Lusk, Jayson L. & Brorsen, B. Wade, 2018. "“Look at Me, I’m Buying Organic”: The Effects of Social Pressure on Organic Food Purchases," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 43(3), September.
    11. Victoria Masi Haruna, 2014. "A New Model of Green Purchase Intention and its Derivatives: Confirmatory Factor Analysis Validation of Constructs," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 6(5), pages 261-268.
    12. Yuting Cui & Raphael Lissillour & Juraj Chebeň & Drahoslav Lančarič & Chunlin Duan, 2022. "The position of financial prudence, social influence, and environmental satisfaction in the sustainable consumption behavioural model: Cross‐market intergenerational investigation during the Covid‐19 ," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 996-1020, July.
    13. Lasarov, Wassili & Mai, Robert & García de Frutos, Nieves & Egea, José Manuel Ortega & Hoffmann, Stefan, 2019. "Counter-arguing as barriers to environmentally motivated consumption reduction: A multi-country study," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 281-305.
    14. Begum Kaplan & Easwar S. Iyer, 2021. "Motivating sustainable behaviors: The role of religiosity in a cross‐cultural context," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(3), pages 792-820, September.
    15. Syed Shah Alam & Maisarah Ahmad & Yi-Hui Ho & Nor Asiah Omar & Chieh-Yu Lin, 2020. "Applying an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior to Sustainable Food Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-14, October.
    16. Nathalie Lazaric & Fabrice Guel & Jean Belin & Vanessa Oltra & Sébastien Lavaud & Ali Douai, 2020. "Determinants of sustainable consumption in France: the importance of social influence and environmental values," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1337-1366, November.
    17. Leonidou, Leonidas C. & Eteokleous, Pantelitsa P. & Christofi, Anna-Maria & Korfiatis, Nikolaos, 2022. "Drivers, outcomes, and moderators of consumer intention to buy organic goods: Meta-analysis, implications, and future agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 339-354.
    18. Sevtap ÜNAL & F. Görgün DEVECİ & Tuğba YILDIZ, 2019. "The main aim of this study is determining which consumption motives and personal and social factors affect organic food buying decisions. Ajzen’s Planned Behavior Theory (TPB) is used to explain consu," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 48(1), pages 1-35, May.
    19. Liobikienė, Genovaitė & Mandravickaitė, Justina & Bernatonienė, Jurga, 2016. "Theory of planned behavior approach to understand the green purchasing behavior in the EU: A cross-cultural study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 38-46.
    20. Irene C. Kamenidou & Spyridon A. Mamalis & Stavros Pavlidis & Evangelia-Zoi G. Bara, 2019. "Segmenting the Generation Z Cohort University Students Based on Sustainable Food Consumption Behavior: A Preliminary Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijag24:344909. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inrapfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.