IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ifaamr/211651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organic Producers Perspectives on California State Mandated Marketing Programs and Implications for a Federal Organic Promotion Order

Author

Listed:
  • Cosentino, Tina D.
  • Baker, Gregory A.

Abstract

This research examines the role of government mandated marketing programs in promoting certified organic produce in California. Data were gathered from public documents, interviews, focus groups, and an industry-wide survey. We find that most California mandated marketing programs minimally address organic production. Regarding the value of generic promotion, slightly more than one-third of the survey respondents indicated that they believed that their mandated marketing program’s promotion efforts increased the sales of their organic products. Two options were highly ranked as alternatives to promote organic products, setting aside a representative amount of the marketing program’s funds for the promotion of organic produce and establishing a non-governmental producer association to promote all organic produce.

Suggested Citation

  • Cosentino, Tina D. & Baker, Gregory A., 2015. "Organic Producers Perspectives on California State Mandated Marketing Programs and Implications for a Federal Organic Promotion Order," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(4), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:211651
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.211651
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/211651/files/120150004.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.211651?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carman, Hoy F. & Klonsky, Karen & Beaujard, Armelle & Rodriguez, Ana Maria, 2004. "Marketing Order Impact on the Organic Sector: Almonds, Kiwifruit and Winter Pears," Research Reports 11930, University of California, Davis, Giannini Foundation.
    2. Greene, Catherine, 2013. "Growth Patterns in the U.S. Organic Industry," Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, issue 09, pages 1-1, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Son, Jungmin & Kim, Jikyung (Jeanne) & Choi, Jeonghye & Kim, Mingyung, 2017. "Linking online niche sales to offline brand conditions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 74-84.
    2. Charles M. Benbrook & Brian P. Baker, 2014. "Perspective on Dietary Risk Assessment of Pesticide Residues in Organic Food," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Carlson, Andrea & Jaenicke, Edward, 2016. "Changes in Retail Organic Price Premiums from 2004 to 2010," Economic Research Report 242448, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Sam Kaninda Tshikala & Esendugue Greg Fonsah & George Boyhan & Elizabeth Little & Julia Gaskin, 2020. "Economic Analysis of Crop Rotation Systems for High Value Cool-Season Vegetables in the Southern Region, USA," Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 25(2), pages 87-93, October.
    5. Khanal, Aditya & Mishra, Ashok, 2016. "Are all farms better-off growing organic? An unconditional quantile regression approach," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235618, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    6. Adjemian, Michael & Brorsen, B. Wade & Hahn, William & Saitone, Tina L. & Sexton, Richard J., 2016. "Thinning Markets in U.S. Agriculture," Economic Information Bulletin 232928, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Khanal, Aditya R. & Mishra, Sachin K & Honey, Ummey, 2018. "Certified organic food production, financial performance, and farm size: An unconditional quantile regression approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 367-376.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:211651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifamaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.