IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/gewipr/260877.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Naturschutzfachliche Optimierung von Grünland mit Hilfe der FFH-Managementplanung in Sachsen

Author

Listed:
  • Lakner, S.
  • Kleinknecht, U.

Abstract

Der vorliegende Beitrag analysiert die Umsetzung der FFH-Richtlinie durch Landwirte in Sachsen. Seit 2002 hat der Freistaat Sachsen 270 FFH-Gebiete an die Europäische Kommission gemeldet und führt in diesen Gebieten systematisch FFH-Managementplanungen durch mit dem Ziel die Naturschutzpraktiken auf den FFH-Flächen zu optimieren. Im Zuge der FFH-Managementplanung werden die Landwirte kontaktiert, um sie mit Hilfe von Beratungsgesprächen zur Optimierung ihrer Bewirtschaftungspraktiken zu motivieren. Der vorliegende Beitrag fasst die bisherigen Erfahrungen aus 17 FFH-Managementplänen in Sachsen zwischen 2003 und 2011 zusammen. Der Datensatz wurde mit Hilfe von Beratungsgesprächen gewonnen und besteht aus betriebsstrukturellen Informationen von 131 Betrieben und ökologische Informationen von 333 FFH-Flächen. Die Statistik zeigt, dass 63 % aller Betriebe bereit sind die Maßnahmen optimal umzusetzen, weitere 20 % zeigen sich offen, leicht angepasste Maßnahmen umzusetzen. Ein einfaches binäres Modell wird angewandt zur Bestimmung möglicher Einflussgrößen auf die Entscheidungen der Betriebe. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die betriebliche Entscheidung für eine naturschutzfachliche Optimierung abhängig ist von der Viehbesatzdichte des Betriebes, jedoch nicht von Betriebsgröße oder dem Flächenumfang der entsprechenden FFH-Flächen auf dem Betrieb. Eine Umsetzung von FFHMaßnahmen ist auf Flächen mit speziellen Agrarumweltmaßnahmen wahrscheinlicher. Allerdings zeigen die Modellergebnisse und die Praxis, dass einige Agrarumweltmaßnahmen nicht immer zu den FFH-Flächen im höheren Erzgebirge passen. Insgesamt erscheint die Praxis der FFH-Managementpläne eine sinnvolle Ergänzung zu den Agrarumweltprogrammen, da dieser Planungsprozess, der in Sachsen von Betriebsbesuchen und Beratung begleitet wird, einen höheren Zielerreichungsgrad im Naturschutz ermöglicht und Landwirte zur Umsetzung von FFH-relevanten Naturschutzmaßnahmen motiviert.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Lakner, S. & Kleinknecht, U., 2013. "Naturschutzfachliche Optimierung von Grünland mit Hilfe der FFH-Managementplanung in Sachsen," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 48, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewipr:260877
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.260877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/260877/files/Bd48Nr07.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/260877/files/Bd48Nr07.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.260877?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stefan Mann, 2005. "Farm Size Growth and Participation in Agri‐environmental Schemes: A Configural Frequency Analysis of the Swiss Case," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 373-384, December.
    2. Isabel Vanslembrouck & Guido Van Huylenbroeck & Wim Verbeke, 2002. "Determinants of the Willingness of Belgian Farmers to Participate in Agri‐environmental Measures," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 489-511, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alló, Maria & Igleasias, Eva & Loureiro, Maria L., 2013. "Farmers’ preferences and social capital towards agri-environmental schemes for protecting birds," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150620, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Kosenius, Anna-Kaisa & Ollikainen, Markku, 2019. "Drivers of Participation in Gypsum Treatment of Fields as an Innovation for Water Protection," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 382-393.
    3. Defrancesco, Edi & Gatto, Paola & Runge, C. Ford & Trestini, Samuele, 2006. "Factors Affecting Farmers' Participation in Agri-Environmental Measures: Evidence from a Case Study," Conference Papers 6688, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    4. Unay-Gailhard, İlkay & Bojnec, Štefan, 2015. "Farm size and participation in agri-environmental measures: Farm-level evidence from Slovenia," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 46, pages 273-282.
    5. Mann, S., 2009. "Zur Wirkungsweise eines outputorientierten Agrarumweltprogramms," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 44, March.
    6. Bertoni, Danilo & Olper, Alessandro, 2012. "The Political Economy Of Agri-Environmental Measures: An Empirical Assessment At The Eu Regional Level," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 6(3-4), pages 1-12, November.
    7. Daniele Mozzato & Paola Gatto & Edi Defrancesco & Lucia Bortolini & Francesco Pirotti & Elena Pisani & Luigi Sartori, 2018. "The Role of Factors Affecting the Adoption of Environmentally Friendly Farming Practices: Can Geographical Context and Time Explain the Differences Emerging from Literature?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, August.
    8. Mann, Stefan, 2018. "Conservation by Innovation: What Are the Triggers for Participation Among Swiss Farmers?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 10-16.
    9. Juanjuan Cheng & Qian Wang & Huanmin Zhang & Toyohiko Matsubara & Naoki Yoshikawa & Jin Yu, 2022. "Does Farm Size Expansion Improve the Agricultural Environment? Evidence from Apple Farmers in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Lakner, Sebastian & Zinngrebe, Yves & Koemle, Dieter, 2020. "Combining management plans and payment schemes for targeted grassland conservation within the Habitats Directive in Saxony, Eastern Germany," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    11. Stupak, Nataliya & Sanders, Jürn & Heinrich, Barbara, 2019. "The Role of Farmers' Understanding of Nature in Shaping their Uptake of Nature Protection Measures," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 301-311.
    12. Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Zagórska, Katarzyna & Letki, Natalia & Tryjanowski, Piotr & Wąs, Adam, 2021. "Drivers of farmers’ willingness to adopt extensive farming practices in a globally important bird area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    13. Melindi-Ghidi, Paolo & Dedeurwaerdere, Tom & Fabbri, Giorgio, 2020. "Using environmental knowledge brokers to promote deep green agri-environment measures," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    14. Bardsley, Douglas K. & Bardsley, Annette M., 2014. "Organising for socio-ecological resilience: The roles of the mountain farmer cooperative Genossenschaft Gran Alpin in Graubünden, Switzerland," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 11-21.
    15. Shibly Shahrier & Koji Kotani, 2016. "Labor Donation Or Money Donation? Pro-Sociality On Prevention Of Natural Disasters In A Case Of Cyclone Aila, Bangladesh," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 61(01), pages 1-26, March.
    16. Jongeneel, Roelof A. & Polman, Nico B.P. & Slangen, Louis H.G., 2005. "Why Are Farmers Going Multifunctional?," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24585, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Anne GASSIAT & Sylvain ROUSSET & Frèdèric ZAHM, 2011. "Improving water quality with a territorial agro-environmental policy? Insights from the new generation AES in South-West France," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1569, European Regional Science Association.
    18. Kanchanaroek, Yingluck & Aslam, Uzma, 2017. "Assessing Farmers’ Preferences To Participate In Agri-environment Policies In Thailand," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 260888, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Espinosa-Goded, Maria & Dupraz, Pierre & Barreiro-Hurlé, Jesùs, 2009. "Fixed costs involved in crop pattern changes and agri-environmental schemes," Working Papers 211000, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    20. Kuhfuss, Laure & Préget, Raphaële & Thoyer, Sophie & de Vries, Frans P. & Hanley, Nick, 2022. "Enhancing spatial coordination in payment for ecosystem services schemes with non-pecuniary preferences," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewipr:260877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.