IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/gewipr/212143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ökonomische Theorie, statistischer Nachweise und Prognose im Agrarsektor

Author

Listed:
  • Weinschenck, G.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Weinschenck, G., 1980. "Ökonomische Theorie, statistischer Nachweise und Prognose im Agrarsektor," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 17.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewipr:212143
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.212143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/212143/files/Bd17Nr42.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.212143?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hayami, Yujiro & Peterson, Willis, 1972. "Social Returns to Public Information Services: Statistical Reporting of U. S. Farm Commodities," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(1), pages 119-130, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vernon Ruttan, 1980. "Bureaucratic productivity: The case of agricultural research," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 529-547, January.
    2. repec:ags:mididp:152396 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Bosch, Darrell J. & Lee, Katherine L., 1988. "The Farm Level Effects of Better Access to Information: The Case of Dart," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 109-118, December.
    4. Schneeberger, Kenneth C., 1982. "Discussion: Valuation Of Crop And Livestock Reports: Methodological Issues And Questions," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 14(1), pages 1-2, July.
    5. Lindner, Bob, 1987. "Toward A Framework for Evaluating Agricultural Economics Research," Discussion Papers 315419, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    6. Jean-Paul Chavas & Rulon D. Pope, 1984. "Information: Its Measurement and Valuation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(5), pages 705-710.
    7. Paul W. Gallagher, 2009. "Roles for evolving markets, policies, and technology improvements in U.S. corn ethanol industry development," Regional Economic Development, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Apr, pages 12-33.
    8. Lusk, Jayson L., 2016. "From Farm Income to Food Consumption: Valuing USDA Data Products," C-FARE Reports 266593, Council on Food, Agricultural, and Resource Economics (C-FARE).
    9. Norton, George W., 1987. "Evaluating Social Science Research in Agriculture," Evaluating Agricultural Research and Productivity, Proceedings of a Workshop, Atlanta, Georgia, January 29-30, 1987, Miscellaneous Publication 52 50028, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.
    10. Skold, Karl Durwood, 1989. "The integration of alternative information systems: an application to the Hogs and Pigs report," ISU General Staff Papers 1989010108000010239, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    11. Norton, George W. & Alwang, Jeffrey, 1997. "Policy for Plenty: Measuring the Benefits of Policy-oriented Social Science Research," Staff Papers 232552, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    12. Griffith, Garry R., 1978. "An Ex Ante Evaluation of the National Pig Carcase Measurement and Information Service," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 46(03), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Zilberman, David & Biemer, Paul & Bonnen, James T. & Capalbo, Susan M. & Chalfant, James A. & Fuller, Wayne A. & Gardner, Bruce L. & Jensen, Helen H. & Kinsey, Jean & Smith, V. Kerry & LeBlanc, Michae, 1997. "AAEA Data Task Force Final Report," AAEA Miscellaneous Paper Archive 337240, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Gardner, Bruce L., 1997. "Returns to Policy-Related Social Science Research in Agriculture," Working Papers 197845, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    15. Antonovitz, Frances & Roe, Terry, 1986. "A Theoretical and Empirical Approach to the Value of Information in Risky Markets," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 68(1), pages 105-114, February.
    16. Kizito, Andrew M., 2009. "Estimating the Benefits from Improved Market Information," Graduate Research Master's Degree Plan B Papers 48844, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    17. Christophe Gouel, 2020. "The Value of Public Information in Storable Commodity Markets: Application to the Soybean Market," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(3), pages 846-865, May.
    18. Freebairn, John W., 1978. "An Evaluation of Outlook Information for Australian Agricultural Commodities," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 46(03), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Krog, David Russell, 1988. "Plant-process model corn yield forecasts for Iowa," ISU General Staff Papers 1988010108000010686, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    20. Marquis, Duane L. & Ray, Daryll E., 1981. "Use Of Stochastic Simulation To Value Improved Crop Forecast Information," 1981 Annual Meeting, July 26-29, Clemson, South Carolina 279419, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    21. Patrick L. Hatzenbuehler & Xiaoxue Du & Kathleen Painter, 2021. "Price transmission with sparse market information: The case of United States chickpeas," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(3), pages 665-682, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewipr:212143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.