IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ersfer/351924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L'agriculture au GATT et la réforme de la PAC : l'éclairage de l'Economie Politique et de l'Economie Publique

Author

Listed:
  • Guyomard, Hervé
  • Mahe, Louis-Paul
  • Munk, Knud
  • Roe, Terry

Abstract

A chronological list of public subsidies (national and european) to French agriculture before the CAP reform is elaborated from state budget documents ("Blancs"). A better adjusted nomenclature to the present situation is proposed for 1991 and will bill used in the future. So, the obtained data allow to point out the subsidised fields : mainly social protection and productive agricultural activity. Within this latter one, the support of price's level takes up a more and more dominant place. The progressive evolution of this subsidies allows an estimation of its importance in the agricultural economics and in all the subsidies to economic activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Guyomard, Hervé & Mahe, Louis-Paul & Munk, Knud & Roe, Terry, 1994. "L'agriculture au GATT et la réforme de la PAC : l'éclairage de l'Economie Politique et de l'Economie Publique," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 220.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:351924
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.351924
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/351924/files/ecoru_0013-0559_1994_num_220_1_4639.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.351924?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olson, Mancur, 1985. "The Exploitation and Subsidization of Agriculture in Developing and Developed Countries," 1985 Conference, August 26-September 4, 1985, Malaga, Spain 182530, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Johnson, Martin & Mahe, Louis Adrien Pascal & Roe, Terry L., 1990. "Politically Acceptable Trade Compromises Between The EC and The US: A Game Theory Approach," Working Papers 51154, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    3. Alexander H. Sarris & John Freebairn, 1983. "Endogenous Price Policies and International Wheat Prices," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(2), pages 214-224.
    4. Petit, Michel, 1985. "Determinants of agricultural policies in the United States and the European Community:," Research reports 51, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Riethmuller, Paul & Roe, Terry, 1986. "Government intervention in commodity markets: The case of Japanese rice and wheat policy," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 327-349.
    6. Honma, Masayoshi & Hayami, Yujiro, 1986. "Structure of agricultural protection in industrial countries," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1-2), pages 115-129, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herve Guyomard & Louis Pascal Mahe & Terry L. Roe, 1994. "L'agriculture au GATT et la nouvelle PAC : la fin d'une exception ?," Post-Print hal-01593896, HAL.
    2. Jonathan Brooks, 1996. "Agricultural Policies In Oecd Countries: What Can We Learn From Political Economy Models?," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1‐4), pages 366-389, January.
    3. von Witzke, Harald & Hausner, Ulrich, 1991. "The Political Economy Of Agricultural And Trade Policies In Open Economies: Implications For International Cooperation In The Gatt," Staff Papers 14141, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    4. H. Guyomard & L. P. Mahé & K. J. Munk & T. L. Roe, 1993. "Agriculture In The Uruguay Round: Ambitions And Realities," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 245-263, May.
    5. Swinnen, Johan F. M. & Banerjee, Anurag N. & Gorter, Harry de, 2001. "Economic development, institutional change, and the political economy of agricultural protection: An econometric study of Belgium since the 19th century," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 25-43, October.
    6. Coggins, Jay S., 1994. "Implementing Agricultural Policy Virtually: The Case of Set-Aside," Staff Papers 200579, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    7. Labson, B. Stephen & Rausser, Gordon C., 1992. "Modeling Phased Reduction of Distortionary Policies in the U.S. Wheat Market Under Alternative Macroeconomic Environments," Staff General Research Papers Archive 502, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    8. C. S. C. Sekhar, 2010. "Structure of the World Wheat Market: Some Implications for Strategic Trade Policy?," Journal of Quantitative Economics, The Indian Econometric Society, vol. 8(2), pages 142-158.
    9. Julian Alston & Colin Carter, 1991. "Causes And Consequences Of Farm Policy," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 9(1), pages 107-121, January.
    10. Mahe, Louis Adrien Pascal & Roe, Terry, 1992. "Political Economy Trade Negotiations: An Empirical Game Theory Analysis," 1992 Occasional Paper Series No. 6 197894, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. James Roumasset, 2010. "Wither the Economics of Agricultural Development?," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, June.
    12. Swinnen, Johan F.M., 2008. "The Political Economy of Agricultural Protection: Europe in the 19th and 20th Century," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 43859, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Fertő, Imre, 1998. "Az agrárpolitika politikai gazdaságtana I. A kormányzati politikák modellezése a mezőgazdaságban [The political economy of agrarian politics. Part I. Modeling of governmental policies in agricultur," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 223-246.
    14. Jeffrey D. McDonald & Daniel A. Sumner, 2003. "The Influence of Commodity Programs on Acreage Response to Market Price: With an Illustration Concerning Rice Policy in the United States," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 85(4), pages 857-871.
    15. von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan, 1992. "A critical assessment of the political preference function approach in agricultural economics," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 7(3-4), pages 371-394, October.
    16. de Gorter, Harry & Tsur, Yacov, 1989. "Explaining Price Policy Bias In Agriculture: A Politician-Voter Interaction Approach," Staff Papers 13388, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    17. von Witzke, Harald & Hausner, Ulrich, 1993. "A Public Choice Analysis Of U.S. Producer Price Support In Wheat And Corn: Implications For Agricultural Trade And Policy," Staff Papers 13475, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    18. Mahe, L P & Tavera, C, 1988. "Bilateral Harmonization of EC and U.S. Agricultural Policies," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 15(4), pages 327-348.
    19. Louis Pascal Mahe & Hervé Guyomard, 1992. "The CAP and the GATT negotiation : between political economy and mercantilism ?," Post-Print hal-01594130, HAL.
    20. Berkeley Hill, 2017. "The United Kingdom's Domestic Policy for Agriculture after Brexit," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 16(2), pages 18-23, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ersfer:351924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sferrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.