IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/erdnra/309064.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unique initiatives for future rural development: culture-uncommon thematic villages in Lithuania

Author

Listed:
  • Vilkė, Rita
  • Gedminaitė-Raudonė, Živilė

Abstract

The expanding possibilities for a better quality of life increasingly accelerate the demand for various unique and uncommon services. The expansion of services had been recently spectated in all sectors and spheres of human activity. The impacts of these changes become evident both in cities and the countryside. The increased requirements and demand for the variety of services in rural areas, at the same time, raised the value of unique cultural resources, specific regions. However, creative innovators found new ways of using unique cultural resources in geographically distanced regions by establishing cultureuncommon thematic villages, which have the potential to mature into unique self-organized business models. This paper aims to explain the potential of using unique cultural resources in culture-uncommon environments for future regional development in the EU on the example of thematic villages. Based on a case study, performed in Lithuania in 2018, this research gives evidence of a successful initiative, developed by using cultural uniqueness in the culture-uncommon environment. Research results reveal that creative application of cultural uniqueness in the particular environment might add to the development of rural region both in the economic and social sense. Culture-uncommon thematic villages hold potential to grow till fully mature self-organized business models and expand with the social and economic impact on the particular region’s development. Therefore, it is suggested to focus on fostering the use of unique cultural resources in the EU CAP support schemes 2020+ next to the aims of making the EU agricultures equally developed by all indicators in all of the EU regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Vilkė, Rita & Gedminaitė-Raudonė, Živilė, 2019. "Unique initiatives for future rural development: culture-uncommon thematic villages in Lithuania," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 16.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:erdnra:309064
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.309064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/309064/files/2019-RAD-16-07-VILKE_96-110.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.309064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles Gore & Charles Gore, 2015. "The Post‐2015 Moment: Towards Sustainable Development Goals and a New Global Development Paradigm," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(6), pages 717-732, August.
    2. Rosanna Salvia & Giovanni Quaranta, 2017. "Place-Based Rural Development and Resilience: A Lesson from a Small Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Gary Bosworth & Viktor Venhorst, 2018. "Economic linkages between urban and rural regions – what’s in it for the rural?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(8), pages 1075-1085, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vilkė, Rita & Gedminaitė-Raudonė, Živilė, 2019. "Unique initiatives for future rural development: culture-uncommon thematic villages in Lithuania," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 309064, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    2. Amitrajeet A. Batabyal & Peter Nijkamp, 2020. "Workplace choice, commuting costs, and wage taxation in urban and adjacent rural regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 65(3), pages 775-786, December.
    3. Rory Horner & David Hulme, 2019. "From International to Global Development: New Geographies of 21st Century Development," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 50(2), pages 347-378, March.
    4. Rory Horner, 2017. "What is global development," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 202017, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    5. Brij B. Gupta & Akshat Gaurav & Prabin Kumar Panigrahi, 2023. "Analysis of the development of sustainable entrepreneurship practices through knowledge and smart innovative based education system," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 923-940, June.
    6. Shin-Cheng Yeh & Haw-Jeng Chiou & Ai-Wei Wu & Ho-Ching Lee & Homer C. Wu, 2019. "Diverged Preferences towards Sustainable Development Goals? A Comparison between Academia and the Communication Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Anushree Poddar & Sapna A. Narula & Ambika Zutshi, 2019. "A study of corporate social responsibility practices of the top Bombay Stock Exchange 500 companies in India and their alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1184-1205, November.
    8. Gary Bosworth & Liz Price & Martin Collison & Charles Fox, 2020. "Unequal futures of rural mobility: Challenges for a “Smart Countrysideâ€," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 35(6), pages 586-608, September.
    9. Dan Zang & Yumei Xie & Silvia Barbero & Amina Pereno, 2023. "How Does Systemic Design Facilitate the Sustainability Transition of Rural Communities? A Comparative Case Study between China and Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Alexandru Pavel & Octavian Moldovan, 2019. "Determining Local Economic Development in the Rural Areas of Romania. Exploring the Role of Exogenous Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, January.
    11. Giovanni Quaranta & Cristina Dalia & Luca Salvati & Rosanna Salvia, 2019. "Building Resilience: An Art–Food Hub to Connect Local Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Moritz Kersting & Eike Matthies & Jörg Lahner & Jan Schlüter, 2021. "A socioeconomic analysis of commuting professionals," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2127-2158, October.
    13. Aga, Deribe Assefa, 2016. "Factors affecting the success of development projects : A behavioral perspective," Other publications TiSEM 867ae95e-d53d-4a68-ad46-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Zhiheng Yang & Nengneng Shen & Yanbo Qu & Bailin Zhang, 2021. "Association between Rural Land Use Transition and Urban–Rural Integration Development: From 2009 to 2018 Based on County-Level Data in Shandong Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Sadowski, Arkadiusz & Baer-Nawrocka, Agnieszka, 2018. "Food and environmental function in world agriculture—Interdependence or competition?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 578-583.
    16. Egamberdiev, Bekhzod & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor & Kuhn, Lena & Glauben, Thomas, 2023. "Household resilience capacity and food security: Evidence from Kyrgyzstan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 15(4), pages 967-988.
    17. Blesh, Jennifer & Hoey, Lesli & Jones, Andrew D. & Friedmann, Harriet & Perfecto, Ivette, 2019. "Development pathways toward “zero hunger”," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-14.
    18. Nora Stognief & Paula Walk & Oliver Schöttker & Pao-Yu Oei, 2019. "Economic Resilience of German Lignite Regions in Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-17, October.
    19. Eugeniusz Kwiatkowski & Agnieszka Krzetowska, 2022. "Gravitation Effects and the Economic Development of Poviats in the Mazovieckie Voivodeship 2010–2019," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 474-492.
    20. José Antonio Rodríguez Martín & José María Martín Martín & Juan Dios Jiménez Aguilera, 2018. "A Synthetic Indicator of Progress Towards the Millennium Development Goals 2, 3 and 4 in the Least Developed Countries (LDCs) of Asia," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:erdnra:309064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erdnnea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.