IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/eaaeac/246052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison analysis of two alternative dairy cattle replacement strategies: Optimization versus Simulation models

Author

Listed:
  • Kalantari, Afshin S.
  • Cabrera, Victor E.
  • Solis, Daniel

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the optimal replacement decisions using two alternative state-of-the-art models: the optimization dynamic programming model and the Markov chain simulation model. Lactation, month in milk and pregnancy status were used to describe cow states in a herd in both models. Both models were fed with the same parameters and transition probabilities to make the fairest comparison possible. The cow value calculated by the Markov chain model was compared against the retention pay-off estimated by the dynamic programming model. These values were used to rank all the animals in the herd. Then, the rank correlation (Spearman’s correlation) was calculated between results of both models. The overall correlation was 95%, which showed a strong linear relationship between rankings of animals from the two models. Moreover, the lowest 10% ranking cows -which are the most likely replacement candidates- displayed a greater correlation, 98%. Thus, the final replacement decisions with both models were similar. A post optimality analysis was used to explore the effect of the optimal replacement decisions on the herd dynamics and herd net return. The results showed a comparable herd structure by both models. A net return was improved US$6/cow per year by using replacement decisions of both dynamic programming model and the Markov chain cow value model.

Suggested Citation

  • Kalantari, Afshin S. & Cabrera, Victor E. & Solis, Daniel, 2014. "A comparison analysis of two alternative dairy cattle replacement strategies: Optimization versus Simulation models," Economi­a Agraria (Revista Economia Agraria), Agrarian Economist Association (AEA), Chile, vol. 18.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaaeac:246052
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.246052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/246052/files/RAE2_2014_Solis.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.246052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kristensen, Anders R., 1988. "Hierarchic Markov processes and their applications in replacement models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 207-215, May.
    2. Blair J. Smith, 1973. "Dynamic Programming of the Dairy Cow Replacement Problem," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 55(1), pages 100-104.
    3. Burt, Oscar R., 1982. "Dynamic Programming: Has Its Day Arrived?," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 7(2), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kamel Elouhichi & Maria Espinosa Goded & Pavel Ciaian & Angel Perni Llorente & Bouda Vosough Ahmadi & Liesbeth Colen & Sergio Gomez Y Paloma, 2018. "The EU-Wide Individual Farm Model for Common Agricultural Policy Analysis (IFM-CAP v.1): Economic Impacts of CAP Greening," JRC Research Reports JRC108693, Joint Research Centre.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trapp, James N., 1989. "The Dawning Of The Age Of Dynamic Theory: Its Implications For Agricultural Economics Research And Teaching," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(1), pages 1-11, July.
    2. Mourits, M. C. M. & Huirne, R. B. M. & Dijkhuizen, A. A. & Kristensen, A. R. & Galligan, D. T., 1999. "Economic optimization of dairy heifer management decisions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 17-31, July.
    3. Young, Michael & Young, John & Kingwell, Ross S. & Vercoe, Philip E., 2023. "Representing weather-year variation in whole-farm optimisation models: Four-stage single-sequence vs eight-stage multi-sequence," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 68(01), September.
    4. Russell Tronstad & C. Robert Taylor, 1989. "Effects of the 1986 Tax Reform Act on Grain Marketing Decisions: A Case Study of Winter Wheat Producers," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 11(2), pages 309-320.
    5. Lars Relund Nielsen & Erik Jørgensen & Søren Højsgaard, 2011. "Embedding a state space model into a Markov decision process," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 289-309, October.
    6. Mjelde, James W. & Harris, Wesley D. & Schnitkey, Gary D. & Conner, J. Richard & Glover, Michael K. & Garoian, Lee, 1991. "Application of Stochastic Processes to Summarize Dynamic Programming Solutions," Departmental Reports 256831, Texas A&M University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    7. Bernardo, Daniel J. & Conner, J. Richard, 1989. "Methodological Issues in Range Economics: Modeling the Range-Livestock Production System," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 244846, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    8. Burt, Oscar R. & Taylor, C. Robert, 1989. "Reduction Of State Variable Dimension In Stochastic Dynamic Optimization Models Which Use Time-Series Data," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 14(2), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Ferchiou, Ahmed & Lhermie, Guillaume & Raboisson, Didier, 2021. "New standards in stochastic simulations of dairy cow disease modelling: Bio-economic dynamic optimization for rational health management decision-making," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    10. Nielsen, Lars Relund & Kristensen, Anders Ringgaard, 2006. "Finding the K best policies in a finite-horizon Markov decision process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 1164-1179, December.
    11. Burt, Oscar R. & Taylor, C. Robert, 1988. "Reduction Of State Variable Dimension In Stochastic Dynamic Optimization Models Which Use Time-Series Data," Working Papers 225814, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    12. Giardini, Giovanni, 1992. "The reform of the agricultural policy in the European Economic Community: an Italian farm simulation study," ISU General Staff Papers 1992010108000017587, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    13. Harper, Jayson K. & Mjelde, James W. & Rister, M. Edward & Way, Michael O. & Drees, Bastiaan M., 1994. "Developing Flexible Economic Thresholds For Pest Management Using Dynamic Programming," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(1), pages 1-14, July.
    14. Pla, L. M. & Pomar, C. & Pomar, J., 2003. "A Markov decision sow model representing the productive lifespan of herd sows," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 253-272, April.
    15. Winsten, Jonathan R. & Stokes, Jeffrey R., 2004. "The efficacy of controlling phosphorus loading: the case of management-intensive grazing," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 79(3), pages 283-303, March.
    16. Erik Jørgensen & Anders Kristensen & Dennis Nilsson, 2014. "Markov Limid processes for representing and solving renewal problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 63-84, August.
    17. Tronstad, Russell, 1991. "The Effects Of Firm Size And Production Cost Levels On Dynamically Optimal After-Tax Cotton Storage And Hedging Decisions," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(1), pages 1-15, July.
    18. Yates, C.M. & Rehman, T., 1998. "A linear programming formulation of the Markovian decision process approach to modelling the dairy replacement problem," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 185-201, October.
    19. Toft, Nils & Kristensen, Anders R. & Jorgensen, Erik, 2005. "A framework for decision support related to infectious diseases in slaughter pig fattening units," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 120-137, August.
    20. Pourmoayed, Reza & Nielsen, Lars Relund & Kristensen, Anders Ringgaard, 2016. "A hierarchical Markov decision process modeling feeding and marketing decisions of growing pigs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 925-938.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaaeac:246052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaagea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.