IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/330345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling of economic efficiency of pig farming in agricultural enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Maksym, Volodymyr
  • Chemerys, Vasyl
  • Dushka, Vitalii
  • Dadak, Oksana
  • Martyniuk, Uliana

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of the study is to determine the principal reserves for increasing the potential of economic efficiency of pig breeding in agricultural enterprises of Ukraine based on modeling the impact of a set of technological and cost variables on the profitability of sales and production. Methodology / approach. The study uses the method of economic-and-mathematical modeling in determining and justifying the level of potential growth of economic efficiency of pig breeding in agricultural enterprises of Ukraine based on different options for optimizing the values of input variables to obtain maximum profitability of sales and production based on 2020 input data. A monographic method is also used for complex research of basic problems of the pigs breeding development in Ukraine, and calculation-constructive method – when substantiating directions for increasing the economic efficiency of pig farming in agricultural enterprises. Results. According to the results of modeling the economic efficiency of pig farming in agricultural enterprises of Ukraine, it was found that based on the optimization of production costs and sales policy, the potential upper limit of profitability in 2020 was about 70 %, which is the most optimistic option. Enterprises organize their cultivation of basic types of feed and enter promising markets with a favorable market environment for business, which allows them to sell products at higher prices. However, in 2022, the upper limit of economic efficiency in terms of sales profitability is projected to decrease 2.4 times or up to 30 % due to rising prices for feed and energy. For a significant proportion of enterprises, pork production will be unprofitable. It also takes into account the effect of scale on the level of economic efficiency, according to which a change in the average concentration of pigs in agricultural enterprises of Ukraine by 1 % leads to an average change in the profitability of sales by 0.3 percentage points (p. p.) and gross profit – at 0.11 p. p. The level of influence on the performance indicators of the main variables, which are taken into account in the model, is determined. It is established that the highest weight of the impact on the profitability of pig sales is the sales price, marketability level (0.81 p. p.), feed conversion, and the average cost of 1 kg per unit feed (0.56 p. p.). The optimal business model of a pig breeding organization is proposed, which will increase the economic efficiency of pork production and bring its level closer to the defined and justified based on modeling potential. Originality / scientific novelty. Methodological approaches to evaluating the economic efficiency of pork production in agricultural enterprises based on modeling profitability indicators considering the established optimization criteria have been further developed. Practical value / implications. Based on the results of modeling the potential of economic efficiency of pig breeding in agricultural enterprises of Ukraine, the principal growth reserves are determined following the main established optimization criteria, which allow producers to choose the best option to increase profitability, taking into account technological and market conditions. The proposed method of determining the economic efficiency of pork production and assessing the principal reserves of its increase can be used for economic analysis at the level of individual enterprises that raise pigs and at the industry level in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Maksym, Volodymyr & Chemerys, Vasyl & Dushka, Vitalii & Dadak, Oksana & Martyniuk, Uliana, 2022. "Modeling of economic efficiency of pig farming in agricultural enterprises," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(3), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:330345
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.330345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330345/files/9_Maksym_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.330345?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chemerys, Vasyl & Dushka, Vitalii & Dorosh, Mariana & Maksym, Volodymyr, 2020. "Export potential of the livestock breeding industry of Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 6(3), September.
    2. Jaroslav Havlíček & Ludmila Dömeová & Luboš Smutka & Helena Řezbová & Lucie Severová & Tomáš Šubrt & Karel Šrédl & Roman Svoboda, 2020. "Efficiency of Pig Production in the Czech Republic and in an International Context," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Jeffrey J. Reimer, 2006. "Vertical Integration in the Pork Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(1), pages 234-248.
    4. Jarkko K. Niemi & Heikki Lehtonen, 2011. "Modelling pig sector dynamic adjustment to livestock epidemics with stochastic-duration trade disruptions," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 38(4), pages 529-551, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Traversac, Jean-Baptiste & Rousset, Sylvain & Perrier-Cornet, Philippe, 2011. "Farm resources, transaction costs and forward integration in agriculture: Evidence from French wine producers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 839-847.
    2. Christine Wieck & Simon W. Schlüter & Wolfgang Britz, 2012. "Assessment of the Impact of Avian Influenza–related Regulatory Policies on Poultry Meat Trade and Welfare," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(8), pages 1037-1052, August.
    3. Du, Ying & Stiegert, Kyle W., 2009. "Strategic Vertical Pricing in the U.S. Butter Market," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 51712, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Niemi, Jarkko K. & Liu, Xing & Pietola, Kyosti, 2011. "Price volatility and return on pig fattening under different price- quantity contract regimes," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114614, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Youhong Lee & Qingxiao Li & Metin Çakır, 2023. "Elasticities of substitution between marketing and farm inputs in a complete system of food commodities," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 1450-1471, September.
    6. Kostas Karantininis & Jesper T. Graversen, 2008. "Relational contracts and adaptation: application to a pork producer contract," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(3), pages 342-354.
    7. Michael Ollinger & Danna Moore, 2009. "The Direct and Indirect Costs of Food-Safety Regulation," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 31(2), pages 247-265.
    8. Maples, Joshua G. & Lusk, Jayson L. & Peel, Derrell S., 2019. "Technology and evolving supply chains in the beef and pork industries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 346-354.
    9. Ahmet Candemir & Sabine Duvaleix & Laure Latruffe, 2021. "Agricultural Cooperatives And Farm Sustainability – A Literature Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1118-1144, September.
    10. Franken, Jason R.V. & Pennings, Joost M.E. & Garcia, Philip, 2009. "Do Transaction Costs and Risk Preferences Influence Marketing Arrangements in the Illinois Hog Industry?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 34(2), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Seabright, Paul & Berardi, Nicoletta, 2010. "Joint Ventures as a Commitment Device Against Lobbies," CEPR Discussion Papers 7714, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    12. Claude Ménard, 2017. "Finding our way in the jungle: insights from organization theory," Post-Print hal-04001137, HAL.
    13. Franken, Jason & Parcell, Joe & Patterson, David & Smith, Michael & Poock, Scott, 2010. "Cow-Calf Producer Interest in Retained Ownership," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 28(1).
    14. Claude Ménard, 2017. "Finding our way in the jungle: insights from organization theory," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-04001137, HAL.
    15. Jitka Sirohi & Zuzana Hloušková & Klára Bartoňová & Karel Malec & Mansoor Maitah & Robert Koželský, 2023. "The Vertical Price Transmission in Pork Meat Production in the Czech Republic," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, June.
    16. Lavruk, Vitalii & Korzhenivska, Nataliia & Tkachuk, Vitalii & Lavruk, Oksana & Heldak, Maria, 2021. "Management of reproduction of the livestock branch as the basis of its innovation-and-investment development," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 7(3), September.
    17. Tong Wang & David A. Hennessy, 2015. "Strategic Interactions Among Private and Public Efforts When Preventing and Stamping Out a Highly Infectious Animal Disease," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 97(2), pages 435-451.
    18. Alexandre Cordier & Jean Gohin & Stephane Krebs & Arnaud Rault, 2013. "Dynamic Impacts of a Catastrophic Production Event: The Foot‐and‐Mouth Disease Case," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(3), pages 480-492, March.
    19. Hueth, Brent & Ligon, Ethan & Dimitri, Carolyn, 2007. "AJAE Appendix: Agricultural Contracts: Data and Research Needs," American Journal of Agricultural Economics APPENDICES, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 89(5), pages 1-7, December.
    20. Johnson, Kamina K. & Hagerman, Amy D. & Thompson, Jada M. & Kopral, Christine A., 2015. "Factors Influencing Export Value Recovery after Highly Pathogenic Poultry Disease Outbreaks," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(A), pages 1-16, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:330345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.