IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aolpei/337997.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of the Gross Domestic Product of Municipalities: a Spatial Glance into the State of Paraná-Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Giron Cima, Elizabeth
  • Freire da Rocha-Junior, Weimar
  • Angel Uribe-Opazo, Miguel
  • Henrique Dalposso, Gustavo

Abstract

The vast relevance of applications of spatial regression models has recently captured the interest of Economics and Agriculture, in the sense of better understanding the spatial behavior of the region under study, in the different forms of approaches. It is interesting to understand why some regions show greater variability than others, and why some forms of regional development are better explained. It is up to the researcher to understand, explore, and organize a series of observations, so that it is possible to make predictions, diagnoses, and recommendations to public policy managers and regional development agents. The municipalities’ Gross Domestic Product (Gdp) has driven studies involving spatial information. The objective of this study was to analyze the Gdp of the municipalities in Paraná-Brazil, in 2018, regarding soybean yield, corn yield, pig production, and the tax on the circulation of goods, through different approaches of spatial regression models. SAR and CAR models are global models, while the GWR model is considered a local one. Three spatial analysis models were used to perform this study: Spatial Autoregressive (SAR), Conditional Autoregressive (CAR), and Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR). The results were compared using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), Cross-Validation Criterion (CVC), and the descriptive graphic of residual diagnoses-Worm Plot. The best result obtained was for the GWR model, which best explained the GDP of the state of Paraná-Brazil in terms of its covariates.

Suggested Citation

  • Giron Cima, Elizabeth & Freire da Rocha-Junior, Weimar & Angel Uribe-Opazo, Miguel & Henrique Dalposso, Gustavo, 2023. "An Analysis of the Gross Domestic Product of Municipalities: a Spatial Glance into the State of Paraná-Brazil," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 15(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aolpei:337997
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.337997
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/337997/files/573_agris-on-line-2-2023-cima-rocha-junior-uribe-opazo-dalposo.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.337997?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Wheeler & Michael Tiefelsdorf, 2005. "Multicollinearity and correlation among local regression coefficients in geographically weighted regression," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 161-187, June.
    2. Banerjee, Onil & Cicowiez, Martin & Vargas, Renato & Obst, Carl & Cala, Javier Rojas & Alvarez-Espinosa, Andrés Camilo & Melo, Sioux & Riveros, Leidy & Romero, Germán & Meneses, Diego Sáenz, 2021. "Gross domestic product alone provides misleading policy guidance for post-conflict land use trajectories in Colombia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    3. Bernard Fingleton, 2008. "A Generalized Method of Moments Estimator for a Spatial Panel Model with an Endogenous Spatial Lag and Spatial Moving Average Errors," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 27-44.
    4. Cristian Silviu Banacu & Mihail Busu & Raluca Ignat & Carmen Lenuta Trica, 2019. "Entrepreneurial Innovation Impact on Recycling Municipal Waste. A Panel Data Analysis at the EU Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Miguel Angel Uribe-Opazo & Joelmir Andr� Borssoi & Manuel Galea, 2012. "Influence diagnostics in Gaussian spatial linear models," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 615-630, July.
    6. A. Stewart Fotheringham & Wenbai Yang & Wei Kang, 2017. "Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR)," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(6), pages 1247-1265, November.
    7. Vlad Mykhnenko & Manuel Wolff, 2019. "State rescaling and economic convergence," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(4), pages 462-477, April.
    8. Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Cristian Jara-Figueroa & Sergio G. Petralia & Mathieu P. A. Steijn & David L. Rigby & César A. Hidalgo, 2020. "Complex economic activities concentrate in large cities," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(3), pages 248-254, March.
    9. Fan, Weiyang & Hao, Yu, 2020. "An empirical research on the relationship amongst renewable energy consumption, economic growth and foreign direct investment in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 598-609.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephen Matthews & Daniel M. Parker, 2013. "Progress in Spatial Demography," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 28(10), pages 271-312.
    2. Paul Harris & Bruno Lanfranco & Binbin Lu & Alexis Comber, 2020. "Influence of Geographical Effects in Hedonic Pricing Models for Grass-Fed Cattle in Uruguay," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Chen, Chao & Feng, Tao & Ding, Chuan & Yu, Bin & Yao, Baozhen, 2021. "Examining the spatial-temporal relationship between urban built environment and taxi ridership: Results of a semi-parametric GWPR model," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    4. Yujiao Chen & Zhengbo Luo, 2022. "Hedonic Pricing of Houses in Megacities Pre- and Post-COVID-19: A Case Study of Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Zhou Huang & Ganmin Yin & Xia Peng & Xiao Zhou & Quanhua Dong, 2023. "Quantifying the environmental characteristics influencing the attractiveness of commercial agglomerations with big geo-data," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(9), pages 2470-2490, November.
    6. Mehmet Burak Kaya & Onur Alisan & Alican Karaer & Eren Erman Ozguven, 2024. "Assessing Tornado Impacts in the State of Kentucky with a Focus on Demographics and Roadways Using a GIS-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-27, January.
    7. Alexis Comber & Khanh Chi & Man Q Huy & Quan Nguyen & Binbin Lu & Hoang H Phe & Paul Harris, 2020. "Distance metric choice can both reduce and induce collinearity in geographically weighted regression," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(3), pages 489-507, March.
    8. Cynthia Sin Tian Ho & Mats Wilhelmsson, 2022. "Geographical accessibility to bank branches and its relationship to new firm formation in Sweden via multiscale geographically weighted regression," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 42(2), pages 191-218, August.
    9. Mühlematter, Dominik J. & Wiedemann, Nina & Xin, Yanan & Raubal, Martin, 2024. "Spatially-aware station based car-sharing demand prediction," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    10. Cui, Wencong & Li, Jianyi & Xu, Wangtu & Güneralp, Burak, 2021. "Industrial electricity consumption and economic growth: A spatio-temporal analysis across prefecture-level cities in China from 1999 to 2014," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    11. Guanwei Zhao & Zhitao Li & Yuzhen Shang & Muzhuang Yang, 2022. "How Does the Urban Built Environment Affect Online Car-Hailing Ridership Intensity among Different Scales?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-25, April.
    12. Emmanuel Ebo Arthur & Solomon Gyamfi & Wolfgang Gerstlberger & Jan Stejskal & Viktor Prokop, 2023. "Towards Circular Economy: Unveiling Heterogeneous Effects of Government Policy Stringency, Environmentally Related Innovation, and Human Capital within OECD Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Balland, Pierre-Alexandre & Boschma, Ron, 2022. "Do scientific capabilities in specific domains matter for technological diversification in European regions?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    14. Chih-Hao Wang & Na Chen, 2021. "A multi-objective optimization approach to balancing economic efficiency and equity in accessibility to multi-use paths," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1967-1986, August.
    15. Yanzhao Wang & Jianfei Cao, 2023. "Examining the Effects of Socioeconomic Development on Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) in China’s Cities Based on Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis and MGWR Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-23, February.
    16. Choi, Kyungsoo, 2022. "Job creation during Korea's transition to a knowledge economy," KDI Journal of Economic Policy, Korea Development Institute (KDI), vol. 44(3), pages 75-99.
    17. Onil Banerjee & Martin Cicowiez & Marcia Macedo & Žiga Malek & Peter Verburg & Sean Goodwin & Renato Vargas & Ludmila Rattis & Paulo M. Brando & Michael T. Coe & Christopher Neill & Octavio Damiani, 2020. "An Amazon Tipping Point: The Economic and Environmental Fallout," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0292, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    18. Tsimpanos, Apostolos & Tsimbos, Cleon & Kalogirou, Stamatis, 2018. "Assessing spatial variation and heterogeneity of fertility in Greece at local authority level," MPRA Paper 100406, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Huang, Siyu & Shi, Yi & Chen, Qinghua & Li, Xiaomeng, 2022. "The growth path of high-tech industries: Statistical laws and evolution demands," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 603(C).
    20. Benjamin Davies & David C. Maré, 2020. "Delineating functional labour market areas with estimable classification stabilities," Working Papers 20_08, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aolpei:337997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fevszcz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.