IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajosrd/342393.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of smartphone adoption and its benefits to the financial performance of agricultural households: Evidence from Hoa Binh province, Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Do, Quan Duc
  • Nguyen, The Kien
  • Tran, Tung Thanh
  • Truong, Thanh Bao
  • Do, Nga Thi
  • Hoang, Lam Khanh

Abstract

Mobile phone usage has come to play a vital role in the enhancement of farmers’ agriculture business. Currently, the adoption of mobile phone technology is considered an important factor in enhancing farmers' access to knowledge of the agricultural market situation. This paper studies the determinants of smartphone adoption in agricultural production and examines the roles smartphone use plays in promoting agricultural firms’ performance. We collected research data from 389 agricultural households in Hoa Binh Province, Vietnam. We considered the impacts of both farmer and farm characteristics on the adoption of smartphones in agriculture. The farmers’ characteristics we examined included the influences of age, education, and gender. For the farm characteristics, we considered the impacts of farm size, farm diversification, and farm location. Using the PLS-SEM method, the results showed that gender had no impact on household smartphone adoption in agricultural production, while education, farm size, farm diversification, and farm location each had a positive effect on smartphone adoption. Farmer age and farm location both impeded smartphone adoption. In addition, as per our expectation, the use of smartphones in agricultural production helped increase the farm’s financial performance. Based on these findings, we offer suggestions to policymakers and researchers in the field of agriculture technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Do, Quan Duc & Nguyen, The Kien & Tran, Tung Thanh & Truong, Thanh Bao & Do, Nga Thi & Hoang, Lam Khanh, 2023. "Determinants of smartphone adoption and its benefits to the financial performance of agricultural households: Evidence from Hoa Binh province, Vietnam," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 13(01), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajosrd:342393
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.342393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/342393/files/Determinants%20of%20smartphone%20adoption.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.342393?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christine Zhenwei Qiang & Siou Chew Kuek & Andrew Dymond & Steve Esselaar, 2012. "Mobile Applications for Agriculture and Rural Development," World Bank Publications - Reports 21892, The World Bank Group.
    2. Tiffin, Richard & Balcombe, Kelvin, 2011. "The determinants of technology adoption by UK farmers using Bayesian model averaging: the cases of organic production and computer usage," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 55(4), pages 1-20.
    3. Venkatesh, Viswanath & Morris, Michael G. & Ackerman, Phillip L., 2000. "A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision-Making Processes," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 33-60, September.
    4. Anthony Siaw & Yuansheng Jiang & Martinson Ankrah Twumasi & Wonder Agbenyo, 2020. "The Impact of Internet Use on Income: The Case of Rural Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nawab Khan & Ram L. Ray & Hazem S. Kassem & Farhat Ullah Khan & Muhammad Ihtisham & Shemei Zhang, 2022. "Does the Adoption of Mobile Internet Technology Promote Wheat Productivity? Evidence from Rural Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Bhagwatwar, Akshay & Hara, Noriko & Ynalvez, Marcus A., 2013. "Out of Asia: Understanding the nexus between technology usage and research productivity in Japan, Singapore, and Taiwan," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 963-970.
    3. Liu, Chuang-Chun, 2016. "Understanding player behavior in online games: The role of gender," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 265-274.
    4. Yee-Loong Chong, Alain & Liu, Martin J. & Luo, Jun & Keng-Boon, Ooi, 2015. "Predicting RFID adoption in healthcare supply chain from the perspectives of users," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 66-75.
    5. Haoyun Meng & Peidong Deng & Jinbo Zhang, 2022. "Nonlinear Impact of Circulation-Industry Intelligentization on the Urban–Rural Income Gap: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, August.
    6. Aimable Nsabimana & Patricia Funjika, 2019. "Mobile phone use, productivity and labour market in Tanzania," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-71, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. Pan Rao & Xiaojin Liu & Shubin Zhu & Xiaolan Kang & Xinglei Zhao & Fangting Xie, 2022. "Does the Application of ICTs Improve the Efficiency of Agricultural Carbon Reduction? Evidence from Broadband Adoption in Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Vishal K. Gupta & Suman Niranjan & Banu A. Goktan & John Eriskon, 2016. "Individual entrepreneurial orientation role in shaping reactions to new technologies," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 935-961, December.
    9. Eliud Dismas Moyi, 2019. "The effect of mobile technology on self-employment in Kenya," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Min, Shi & Liu, Min & Huang, Jikun, 2020. "Does the application of ICTs facilitate rural economic transformation in China? Empirical evidence from the use of smartphones among farmers," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Guimin Zhang & Xiangling Wu & Ke Wang, 2022. "Research on the Impact and Mechanism of Internet Use on the Poverty Vulnerability of Farmers in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Gyawali, Buddhi R. & Paudel, Krishna P. & Jean, Rosny & Banerjee, Swagata “Ban”, 2023. "Adoption of computer-based technology (CBT) in agriculture in Kentucky, USA: Opportunities and barriers," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    13. Martinson Ankrah Twumasi & Yuansheng Jiang & Evans B. Ntiamoah & Selorm Akaba & Kwabena N. Darfor & Linda K. Boateng, 2022. "Access to credit and farmland abandonment nexus: The case of rural Ghana," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 46(1), pages 3-20, February.
    14. Cowan, Kelly R. & Daim, Tugrul U., 2011. "Review of technology acquisition and adoption research in the energy sector," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 183-199.
    15. Daniele Mozzato & Paola Gatto & Edi Defrancesco & Lucia Bortolini & Francesco Pirotti & Elena Pisani & Luigi Sartori, 2018. "The Role of Factors Affecting the Adoption of Environmentally Friendly Farming Practices: Can Geographical Context and Time Explain the Differences Emerging from Literature?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, August.
    16. Xinyan Wei & Ying Liu & Yang Liu, 2023. "Study on the Impact of Internet Usage, Aging on Farm Household Income," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, September.
    17. Junmin Lee & Keungoui Kim & Hyunha Shin & Junseok Hwang, 2018. "Acceptance Factors of Appropriate Technology: Case of Water Purification Systems in Binh Dinh, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, June.
    18. Banik, Shanta & Gao, Yongqiang, 2023. "Exploring the hedonic factors affecting customer experiences in phygital retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    19. Hao Gai & Tingwu Yan & Anran Zhang & William David Batchelor & Yun Tian, 2021. "Exploring Factors Influencing Farmers’ Continuance Intention to Crop Residue Retention: Evidence from Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Nik Ab Halim, 2012. "Technology Readiness and Users Satisfaction towards Self-Service Technology at Malaysian Airport," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 4(8), pages 453-460.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajosrd:342393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesstea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.