IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajosrd/342365.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust and Communication Influence on Farm Performance for Paddy Farmers: A Study in Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Iris, F.
  • Nawi, N. M.
  • Man, N.
  • Ramli, N. N.
  • Uddin, M. T

Abstract

Farmers are currently moving toward business relationships and forming close ties with business partners in the supply chain. Close business ties reduce costs, enhance efficiency, improve profit, increase competitive advantage and build personal relationships. Utilizing strategic relationship elements such as trust and communication has significant importance for farmers and marketers. This study assessed the influence of trust and communication on farm performance of paddy farmers’ in Bangladesh. Data was collected through quantitative survey-based interviews with 356 farmers from the Mymensingh District, Bangladesh. Descriptive analysis was used to summarize the farmers’ demographic details and exchange relationship with their preferred paddy buyer. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to test the hypotheses. The findings revealed that trust and communication contributed to promoting paddy farmers’ farm performance, especially profit, sales, and cash flow growth. The study findings offer farmers a basis for developing long-term business relationships by applying trust and communication to establish, maintain, and enhance farm performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Iris, F. & Nawi, N. M. & Man, N. & Ramli, N. N. & Uddin, M. T, 2022. "Trust and Communication Influence on Farm Performance for Paddy Farmers: A Study in Bangladesh," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, Asian Economic and Social Society (AESS), vol. 12(02), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajosrd:342365
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.342365
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/342365/files/Trust%20and%20Communication%20Influence%20on%20Farm%20Performance%20for%20Paddy%20Farmers%20A%20Study%20in%20Bangladesh.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.342365?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fang, Junxiong & He, Lerong & Conyon, Martin J., 2018. "The CEO Horizon Problem and Managerial Slack in China," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 343-376, June.
    2. Walter Engert & Ben Fung & Scott Hendry, 2018. "Is a Cashless Society Problematic?," Discussion Papers 18-12, Bank of Canada.
    3. Paul J. J. Welfens, 2018. "Macroprudential Risk Management Problems in Brexit," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 53(5), pages 281-286, September.
    4. Georgios K. D. Saharidis & Antonios Fragkogios, 2018. "Open Problems on Benders Decomposition Algorithm," Springer Optimization and Its Applications, in: Panos M. Pardalos & Athanasios Migdalas (ed.), Open Problems in Optimization and Data Analysis, pages 305-317, Springer.
    5. Bahtışen Kavak & Ayşegül E. Sertoğlu & Öznur Ö. Tektaş, 2016. "The Moderating Effect of Knowledge Transfer on Satisfaction-Performance Relationship," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 6(5), pages 49-63, May.
    6. Osmani, Ataul Gani & Hossain, Elias, 2015. "Market Participation Decision Of Smallholder Farmers And Its Determinants In Bangladesh," Economics of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 62(1), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Dickson, David C.M. & Qazvini, Marjan, 2018. "Ruin problems in Markov-modulated risk models," Annals of Actuarial Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 23-48, March.
    8. Sartorius, Kurt & Kirsten, Johann, 2007. "A framework to facilitate institutional arrangements for smallholder supply in developing countries: An agribusiness perspective," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5-6), pages 640-655.
    9. Vithya Leninkumar, 2017. "The Relationship between Customer Satisfaction and Customer Trust on Customer Loyalty," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 7(4), pages 450-465, April.
    10. Bahtışen Kavak & Ayşegül E. Sertoğlu & Öznur Ö. Tektaş, 2016. "The Moderating Effect of Knowledge Transfer on Satisfaction-Performance Relationship," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 6(5), pages 49-63, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefano Ciliberti & Simone Del Sarto & Angelo Frascarelli & Giulia Pastorelli & Gaetano Martino, 2020. "Contracts to Govern the Transition towards Sustainable Production: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Analysis in the Durum Wheat Sector in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-14, November.
    2. Pei-An LIAO & Hung-Hao CHANG & Junlin HE & Kannika SAELIW, 2017. "Diversification of marketing strategies among small farms: empirical evidence from family farms in Taiwan," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(11), pages 493-501.
    3. Schipmann, Christin & Qaim, Matin, 2011. "Supply chain differentiation, contract agriculture, and farmers’ marketing preferences: The case of sweet pepper in Thailand," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 667-677.
    4. Gerson K. Kampungu & Emma Nekayi & Dortea N. Nakandjibi & Gilbert M. Mulonda, 2024. "Running Head: Factors Affecting Market Access for Horticultural Farmers," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(4), pages 1557-1569, April.
    5. Schipmann, Christin & Qaim, Matin, 2011. "Supply chain differentiation, contract agriculture, and farmers’ marketing preferences: the case of sweet pepper in Thailand," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 108349, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    6. Xiaoyong Zhang & Lusine H. Aramyan, 2009. "A conceptual framework for supply chain governance," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(2), pages 136-154, January.
    7. Agur, Itai & Ari, Anil & Dell’Ariccia, Giovanni, 2022. "Designing central bank digital currencies," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 62-79.
    8. Mohamed Albaity & Mahfuzur Rahman, 2021. "Customer Loyalty towards Islamic Banks: The Mediating Role of Trust and Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Shirie Pui Shan Ho & Amy Wong, 2023. "The role of customer personality in premium banking services," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(2), pages 285-305, June.
    10. Rajabu Joseph Kangile & Charles Peter Mgeni & Zena Theopist Mpenda & Stefan Sieber, 2020. "The Determinants of Farmers’ Choice of Markets for Staple Food Commodities in Dodoma and Morogoro, Tanzania," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, April.
    11. Angelo Frascarelli & Stefano Ciliberti & Gustavo Magalhães de Oliveira & Gabriele Chiodini & Gaetano Martino, 2021. "Production Contracts and Food Quality: A Transaction Cost Analysis for the Italian Durum Wheat Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-12, March.
    12. Stenfors, Alexis & Susai, Masayuki, 2021. "Spoofing and pinging in foreign exchange markets," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    13. Kiran Faiza, 2023. "Determinants of Consumers’ Decision to Switch to Islamic Banking System: A Case Study of Oman," Contemporary Review of the Middle East, , vol. 10(1), pages 46-61, March.
    14. Aisha Hassan & Li Cui-Xia & Naveed Ahmad & Muzaffar Iqbal & Kramat Hussain & Muhammad Ishtiaq & Maira Abrar, 2021. "Safety Failure Factors Affecting Dairy Supply Chain: Insights from a Developing Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, August.
    15. Mungandi, Sepiso & Conforte, Daniel & Shadbolt, Nicola M., 2012. "Integration of Smallholders in Modern Agri-food Chains: Lessons from the KASCOL Model in Zambia," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, September.
    16. Muhammad Asad Ur Rehman Naseer & Amar Razzaq & Muhammad Ashfaq & Mubashir Mehdi & Sajid Karim & Muhammad Shoaib Naseer, 2023. "Beyond Subsistence: Linking Citrus Smallholders to High-Value Markets for Sustainable Supply Chain Development in Pakistan," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 5(3), pages 246-257.
    17. Hung-Che Wu & Xiaolian Chen & Ya-Yuan Chang, 2021. "Structural relationships between psychosocial risk, relationship quality, need for cognition, and quarantine intentions: the case of the quarantine hotel," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 15(4), pages 587-611, December.
    18. Mugwagwa, Innocent & Bijman, Jos & Trienekens, Jacques, 2020. "Typology of contract farming arrangements: a transaction cost perspective," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 59(2), March.
    19. Adebayo, C. O. & Oladele, A. O. & Tanko, S. U., 2018. "Commercialization among Smallholder Maize Farmers in Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria," Nigerian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Nigerian Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 8(1), October.
    20. Vroegindewey, Ryan & Theriault, Veronique & Staatz, John, 2015. "A Framework for Analyzing Coordination in African Agricultural Value Chains," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205327, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajosrd:342365. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesstea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.