IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajfand/340674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Differential Gains That Outstanding And Average Performing Farmers Attain From Climate-Smart Cassava Innovations In Nyando Climate-Smart Villages, Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Tana, PO
  • Maina, SW
  • Makini, FW
  • Bebe, BO

Abstract

In adoption of agricultural innovations, a few farmers attain outstanding outcomes above their peer majority. This reveals a positive deviance behavior in successful deployment of technologies and innovations. Assessing this behavior in climatesmart agriculture (CSA) can reveal the yield gap in triple wins of CSA (adaptation, farm productivity and mitigation). This study investigated differential gains in these CSA triple wins between outstanding (positive deviants) and average (typical) performing farmers who have adopted climate smart cassava innovations in Nyando Climate Smart Villages (CSV). In a household survey, a sample of 150 farmers were reached, which through snowballing approach, peers identified 30 to exhibit positive deviant behaviour. Presenting these in Focus Group Discussion (FGD) with stakeholders further isolated six farmers being those they consider positive deviants (PDs) in climate smart cassava innovations. Data were subjected to cross-tabulation to generate frequencies used to compute weighted index scores. This revealed increasing magnitude and was a preferred fair comparison of a sample of fewer positive deviants (n=6) with large number of typical (n=144) farmers. Results revealed substantial differences in the attained triple win gains from climate smart cassava innovations between typical and positive deviant farmers. The weighted index scores showed that positive deviant farmers had attained higher adaptability, production diversification, farm productivity and intensification, food security and were implementing more mitigation practices for climate change. This empirical evidence demonstrates potential gains from climate smart cassava innovations when deployed effectively. This is because innovative management practices distinguish positive deviant farmers from typical farmers. These typical farmers would benefit more by learning from positive deviant farmers about effective deployment of climate smart cassava innovations. The study recommends strengthening extension services linked to farmer platforms in order to grow capacity for more effective deployment of climate smart cassava innovations for realising the CSA triple wins.

Suggested Citation

  • Tana, PO & Maina, SW & Makini, FW & Bebe, BO, 2023. "Assessing Differential Gains That Outstanding And Average Performing Farmers Attain From Climate-Smart Cassava Innovations In Nyando Climate-Smart Villages, Kenya," African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), vol. 23(3), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajfand:340674
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.340674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/340674/files/Tana.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.340674?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dogliotti, S. & García, M.C. & Peluffo, S. & Dieste, J.P. & Pedemonte, A.J. & Bacigalupe, G.F. & Scarlato, M. & Alliaume, F. & Alvarez, J. & Chiappe, M. & Rossing, W.A.H., 2014. "Co-innovation of family farm systems: A systems approach to sustainable agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 76-86.
    2. Aditya Parmar & Asnake Fikre & Barbara Sturm & Oliver Hensel, 2018. "Post-harvest management and associated food losses and by-products of cassava in southern Ethiopia," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(2), pages 419-435, April.
    3. Srinivasan, M.S. & Jongmans, C. & Bewsell, D. & Elley, G., 2019. "Research idea to science for impact: Tracing the significant moments in an innovation based irrigation study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 181-192.
    4. Katrin Reincke & Elisa Vilvert & Anja Fasse & Frieder Graef & Stefan Sieber & Marcos A. Lana, 2018. "Key factors influencing food security of smallholder farmers in Tanzania and the role of cassava as a strategic crop," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(4), pages 911-924, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Toffolini, Quentin & Jeuffroy, Marie-Hélène & Meynard, Jean-Marc & Borg, Julie & Enjalbert, Jérôme & Gauffreteau, Arnaud & Goldringer, Isabelle & Lefèvre, Amélie & Loyce, Chantal & Martin, Philippe & , 2020. "Design as a source of renewal in the production of scientific knowledge in crop science," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    2. Ronner, E. & Descheemaeker, K. & Almekinders, C. & Ebanyat, P. & Giller, K.E., 2019. "Co-design of improved climbing bean production practices for smallholder farmers in the highlands of Uganda," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1-12.
    3. Nicholas, Graeme & Srinivasan, MS & Beechener, Sam & Foote, Jeff & Robson-Williams, Melissa & FitzHerbert, Stephen, 2020. "Transferring the impacts of pilot-scale studies to other scales: Understanding the role of non-biophysical factors using field-based irrigation studies," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    4. Peltonen-Sainio, Pirjo & Jauhiainen, Lauri & Laurila, Heikki & Sorvali, Jaana & Honkavaara, Eija & Wittke, Samantha & Karjalainen, Mika & Puttonen, Eetu, 2019. "Land use optimization tool for sustainable intensification of high-latitude agricultural systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Ingram, Julie & Dwyer, Janet & Gaskell, Peter & Mills, Jane & Wolf, Pieter de, 2018. "Reconceptualising translation in agricultural innovation: A co-translation approach to bring research knowledge and practice closer together," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 38-51.
    6. Jessica Blythe & Reuben Sulu & Daykin Harohau & Rebecca Weeks & Anne-Maree Schwarz & David Mills & Michael Phillips, 2017. "Social Dynamics Shaping the Diffusion of Sustainable Aquaculture Innovations in the Solomon Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Phouvong Phami & Jianhua He & Dianfeng Liu & Su Ding & Patrik Silva & Chun Li & Zhijiao Qin, 2020. "Exploring the Determinants of Food Security in the Areas of the Nam Theun2 Hydropower Project in Khammuan, Laos," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, January.
    8. Sylvain, Dernat & Bertrand, Dumont & Dominique, Vollet, 2023. "La Grange®: A generic game to reveal trade-offs and synergies among stakeholders in livestock farming areas," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    9. Rossing, Walter A.H. & Albicette, Maria Marta & Aguerre, Veronica & Leoni, Carolina & Ruggia, Andrea & Dogliotti, Santiago, 2021. "Crafting actionable knowledge on ecological intensification: Lessons from co-innovation approaches in Uruguay and Europe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    10. Reyna-Ramírez, Cristian A. & Rodríguez-Sánchez, Luis Manuel & Vela-Correa, Gilberto & Etchevers-Barra, Jorge & Fuentes-Ponce, Mariela, 2018. "Redesign of the traditional Mesoamerican agroecosystem based on participative ecological intensification: Evaluation of the soil and efficiency of the system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 177-186.
    11. Innocensia John, 2024. "Indigenous or Exotic Crop Diversity? Which Crops Ensure Household Food Security: Facts from Tanzania Panel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, May.
    12. Pissonnier, Solène & Dufils, Arnaud & Le Gal, Pierre-Yves, 2019. "A methodology for redesigning agroecological radical production systems at the farm level," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 161-171.
    13. Nicholson, Charles F. & Stephens, Emma C. & Kopainsky, Birgit & Jones, Andrew D. & Parsons, David & Garrett, James, 2021. "Food security outcomes in agricultural systems models: Current status and recommended improvements," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    14. Sayamol Charoenratana & Cholnapa Anukul & Peter M. Rosset, 2021. "Food Sovereignty and Food Security: Livelihood Strategies Pursued by Farmers during the Maize Monoculture Boom in Northern Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Vänninen, Irene & Pereira-Querol, Marco & Engeström, Yrjö, 2015. "Generating transformative agency among horticultural producers: An activity-theoretical approach to transforming Integrated Pest Management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 38-49.
    16. Agnieszka Poczta-Wajda & Agnieszka Sapa & Sebastian Stępień & Michał Borychowski, 2020. "Food Insecurity among Small-Scale Farmers in Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    17. Haimanot Hailegiorgis Ayele & Sajid Latif & Joachim Müller, 2021. "Influence of Temperature and Screw Pressing on the Quality of Cassava Leaf Fractions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Adelhart Toorop, Roos & Ceccarelli, Viviana & Bijarniya, Deepak & Jat, Mangi Lal & Jat, Raj Kumar & Lopez-Ridaura, Santiago & Groot, Jeroen C.J., 2020. "Using a positive deviance approach to inform farming systems redesign: A case study from Bihar, India," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    19. Meyer, Jessica, 2023. "How do forests contribute to food security following a weather shock? Evidence from Malawi," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    20. Colnago, P. & Rossing, W.A.H. & Dogliotti, S., 2021. "Closing sustainability gaps on family farms: Combining on-farm co-innovation and model-based explorations," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Food Security and Poverty;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajfand:340674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ajfand.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.