IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/agreko/9501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analysis of factors contributing to the use of an income equalisation deposit scheme by commercial farmers in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Lishman, J.-L.
  • Nieuwoudt, W. Lieb

Abstract

Recent research suggests that an Income Equalisation Deposit (IED) scheme could be a feasible new risk management tool for commercial farmers in South Africa. This prompted a study of practicing consultants (tax experts) views on determining what types of farmers would be likely to use the scheme. During 2000, a postal survey of 24 consultants was conducted mainly in KwaZulu-Natal, and in the Maize Triangle and surrounding areas. Each consultant was to review nine scenarios (eight plus a control, giving 192 observations) and decide whether they would recommend an IED scheme for each scenario. A statistical experimental design was used to structure the scenarios, allowing for main and interaction effects between variables that could influence the potential use of an IED scheme. Discriminant analysis revealed that, ceteris paribus, farmers with higher annual net farm incomes (>R300,000), lower debt/asset ratios (<15%), more variable net farm incomes, and less off-farm income would most likely use an IED scheme. In terms of ranking, ceteris paribus, high risk maize farmers, intermediate risk maize farmers and high risk livestock farmers are more likely to use an IED scheme than are low risk maize farmers, low and intermediate risk livestock farmers and diversified farmers. These results support the use of an IED scheme as a risk management tool as higher risk farmers are more likely to make use of the scheme.

Suggested Citation

  • Lishman, J.-L. & Nieuwoudt, W. Lieb, 2003. "An analysis of factors contributing to the use of an income equalisation deposit scheme by commercial farmers in South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 42(4), pages 1-28, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:9501
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.9501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/9501/files/42040325.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.9501?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen C. Gabriel & C. B. Baker, 1980. "Concepts of Business and Financial Risk," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 62(3), pages 560-564.
    2. de Jager, Fritz & Swanepoel, Vernon, 1994. "Factors Associated With Farm Financial Failure In The Northern Springbok Flats," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 33(4), December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Blanck, Niklas & Bahrs, Enno, 2011. "Die Wirksamkeit Und Das Budgetbelastungspotenzial Einer Risikoausgleichsrücklage In Der Deutschen Landwirtschaft," 51st Annual Conference, Halle, Germany, September 28-30, 2011 114505, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    2. Blanck, N. & Bahrs, E., 2012. "Die Wirksamkeit und das Budgetbelastungspotenzial einer Risikoausgleichsrücklage in der deutschen Landwirtschaft," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 47, March.
    3. Bahrs, Enno & Blanck, Niklas, 2009. "Die Risikoausgleichsrücklage als Instrument des landwirtschaftlichen Risikomanagements," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 58(04), pages 1-9, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Swanepoel, D. S., 1996. "Causes Of Maize Farm Bankruptcy In South Africa: 1970- 1994," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 35(4), December.
    2. Swanepoel, Deon S. & Ortmann, Gerald F. & Darroch, Mark A.G., 1997. "Causes of Bankruptcy Amongst Extensive Beef Farmers in South Africa: 1970-1994," 11th Congress, University of Calgary, Canada, July 14-19, 1997 346368, International Farm Management Association.
    3. John Garvey & Gordon Sirr & Deirdre O'Shea & Fergal O'Brien, 2019. "Risk and Planning in Agriculture: How Planning on Dairy Farms in Ireland Is Affected by Farmers’ Regulatory Focus," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(7), pages 1491-1502, July.
    4. Yann de Mey & Erwin Wauters & Dierk Schmid & Markus Lips & Mark Vancauteren & Steven Van Passel, 2016. "Farm household risk balancing: empirical evidence from Switzerland," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 43(4), pages 637-662.
    5. Beal, Diana J., 1996. "Emerging Issues in Risk Management in Farm Firms," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(03), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Deane, Paul & Malcolm, Bill, 2006. "Do Australian woolgrowers manage price risk rationally?," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 3(2), pages 1-7.
    7. Barkema, Alan Dean, 1985. "Farm survival under uncertainty," ISU General Staff Papers 1985010108000017535, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    8. Lien, Gudbrand, 2002. "Non-parametric estimation of decision makers' risk aversion," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 75-83, May.
    9. Featherstone, Allen M., 1990. "Optimal Capital Structure as Business Risk Changes," 1990 Quantifying Long Run Agricultural Risks and Evaluating Farmer Responses to Risk Meeting, January 28-31, 1990, Sanibel Island, Florida 271544, Regional Research Projects > S-232: Quantifying Long Run Agricultural Risks and Evaluating Farmer Responses to Risk.
    10. Ifft, Jennifer & Kuethe, Todd & Morehart, Mitch, 2015. "Does Federal Crop Insurance lead to higher farm debt use? Evidence from the Agricultural Resource Management Survey," Working Papers 250011, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    11. Assem Abu Hatab & Carl‐Johan Lagerkvist & Abourehab Esmat, 2021. "Risk perception and determinants in small‐ and medium‐sized agri‐food enterprises amidst the COVID‐19 pandemic: Evidence from Egypt," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(1), pages 187-212, January.
    12. de Mey, Yann & Wauters, Erwin & van Winsen, Frankwin & Vancauteren, Mark & Van Passel, Steven & Lauwers, Ludwig H., 2012. "From total farm to household risk: implication for risk management," 123rd Seminar, February 23-24, 2012, Dublin, Ireland 122470, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Guanming He & Helen Mengbing Ren, 2024. "Derivative disclosures and managerial opportunism," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(3), pages 384-419, March.
    14. KULCSÁR Edina, 2019. "Trade And Manufacturing Companies Risk Analysis," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 169-178, December.
    15. Wilson, Paul N. & Gundersen, Carl E., 1985. "Financial Risk In Cotton Production," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-8, December.
    16. Watt, David L. & Larson, James A., 1987. "Behavioral Responses of Farmers to Risk," 1987 Annual Meeting, August 2-5, East Lansing, Michigan 270124, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Anette Ruml & Martin C. Parlasca, 2022. "In‐kind credit provision through contract farming and formal credit markets," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(2), pages 402-425, April.
    18. Ifft, Jennifer & Jodlowski, Margaret, 2017. "Federal crop insurance and agricultural credit use," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 259120, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Nemessalyi, Zsolt & Madai, Hajnalka & Nabradi, Andras, 2004. "Risk And Risk Management In Hungarian Livestock Production With A Special Regard To Sheep Production," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20233, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Bramma, Keith M., 2000. "Pricing farm loans for credit risk," 2000 Conference (44th), January 23-25, 2000, Sydney, Australia 123607, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural Finance;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:9501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.