IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/agreko/54980.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Farm Labour Remuneration, Labour Legislation And Commercial Farmers' Perceptions In Kwazulu-Natal

Author

Listed:
  • Newman, R.A.
  • Ortmann, Gerald F.
  • Lyne, Michael C.

Abstract

A survey was conducted in 1995 among 135 commercial farmers in KwaZulu-Natal to analyse labour remuneration and farmers' perceptions about the impact of labour legislation recently extended to agriculture. Farm labour remuneration normally includes cash wages and payments in kind (such as rations, housing, land use rights and clothing). The study suggests that, all things being equal, farmers who pay relatively lower cash wages tend to provide more rations per worker and allocate more land use rights. Most respondents agreed that there is some need for labour legislation in agriculture, but the majority perceived the present legislation to be time-consuming and costly, and wanted the legislation to be less ambiguous, more flexible and less extensive. Labour legislation has increased transaction and wage costs in farming and could lead to the substitution of own machinery, contract machinery or contract labour for own labour. Survey respondents indicated that, if minimum wages were imposed, cash wages would be paid and perquisites would be charged for. If the minimum wage was set above present wages, labour would be replaced with machinery and contractors. Respondents would prefer an industrial council to determine minimum wages (if they are imposed), accounting for enterprise and regional differences.

Suggested Citation

  • Newman, R.A. & Ortmann, Gerald F. & Lyne, Michael C., 1997. "Farm Labour Remuneration, Labour Legislation And Commercial Farmers' Perceptions In Kwazulu-Natal," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 36(1), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:54980
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.54980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/54980/files/Newman%20-%20March%201997.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.54980?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E.J. Goedecke & G.F. Ortmann, 1993. "Transaction Costs and Labour Contracting in the South African Forestry Industry," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 61(1), pages 44-54, March.
    2. Joseph D. Coffey, 1969. "National Labor Relations Legislation: Possible Impact on American Agriculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 51(5), pages 1065-1074.
    3. Bruce Gardner, 1972. "Minimum Wages and the Farm Labor Market," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 54(3), pages 473-476.
    4. Woodburn, M. R. & Ortmann, G. F., 1994. "Research Note: Problems And Opportunities In Agriculture - Perceptions Of Commercial Farmers In Natal," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 33(1), March.
    5. Theodore P. Lianos, 1972. "Impact of Minimum Wages Upon the Level and Composition of Agricultural Employment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 54(3), pages 477-484.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Conradie, Beatrice, 2005. "Wages and wage elasticities for wine and table grapes in South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 44(1), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Beatrice Conradie & Jenifer Piesse & Colin Thirtle & Nick Vink, 2018. "Labour Demand in the Post‐apartheid South African Wine Industry," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(3), pages 815-832, September.
    3. Murray, Justin & van Walbeek, Corne, 2007. "Impact of the Sectoral Determination for Farm Workers on the South African Sugar Industry: Case Study of the KwaZulu-Natal North and South Coasts," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 46(1), pages 1-19, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Murray, Justin & van Walbeek, Corne, 2007. "Impact of the Sectoral Determination for Farm Workers on the South African Sugar Industry: Case Study of the KwaZulu-Natal North and South Coasts," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 46(1), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Sparrow, G.N. & Ortmann, Gerald F. & Lyne, Michael C. & Darroch, Mark A.G., 2008. "Determinants of the demand for regular farm labour in South Africa, 1960-2002," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 47(1), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Maoyong Fan & Anita Alves Pena, 2019. "Do minimum wage laws affect those who are not covered? Evidence from agricultural and non-agricultural workers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, October.
    4. repec:ags:aaea22:335822 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Ortmann, Gerald F., 2005. "Promoting the competitiveness of South African agriculture in a dynamic economic and political environment," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 44(3), pages 1-35, September.
    6. Amy M. G. Kandilov & Ivan T. Kandilov, 2020. "The minimum wage and seasonal employment: Evidence from the US agricultural sector," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 612-627, September.
    7. Kandilov, Amy & Kandilov, Ivan T., 2018. "The Impact of the Minimum Wage on Employment, Earnings, Wages, and Hours in the U.S. Agricultural Sector," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274158, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Michael A. Clemens & Ethan G. Lewis & Hannah M. Postel, 2018. "Immigration Restrictions as Active Labor Market Policy: Evidence from the Mexican Bracero Exclusion," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(6), pages 1468-1487, June.
    9. Zhang, Y., 2001. "Economics of transaction costs saving forestry," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 197-204, February.
    10. Bo?ena Kade?ábková & Emílie Ja?ová, 2019. "The Relation between Minimum Wage and Unemployment across the Economic Cycle in Countries of the Visegrad Group," Proceedings of Economics and Finance Conferences 8910608, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    11. Espey, Molly & Thilmany, Dawn D., 2000. "Farm Labor Demand: A Meta-Regression Analysis Of Wage Elasticities," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 25(1), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Peter R. Fallon & Luis Riveros, 1986. "Regulaciones del mercado laboral: un estudio comparativo entre países," Estudios de Economia, University of Chile, Department of Economics, vol. 13(2 Year 19), pages 349-389, December.
    13. Vera Bitsch & Stefan Mair & Marta M. Borucinska & Christiane A. Schettler, 2017. "Introduction of a Nationwide Minimum Wage: Challenges to Agribusinesses in Germany," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 19(1), pages 13-34.
    14. Weaver, Robert D., 1980. "Measurement and Forecasting of Agricultural Productivity," Staff Paper Series 256838, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    15. Thilmany, Dawn D. & Espey, Molly, 1998. "Farm Labor Demand And Supply: A Meta-Analysis Of Wage Elasticities," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 21001, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Anita Alves Pena, 2013. "Do Minimum Wage Laws Affect People Who Are Not Covered? Evidence from Documented and Undocumented, Hourly and Piece Rate Workers in U.S. Agriculture," Upjohn Working Papers 13-194, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Labor and Human Capital;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:agreko:54980. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeasaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.