IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aergaa/262441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption of rural development policies in rural areas of Italy: between family and farm strategy

Author

Listed:
  • De Rosa, Marcello
  • Bartoli, Luca

Abstract

The aim of the paper is the analysis of the “consumption” of rural development poli- cies by family farms. The underlying hypothesis is that family farm’s characteristics influence the consumption of rural development policies. Therefore, a relevant aspect to be examined concerns family size, localization in life cycle, and the presence of assis- tants within the family farms. The results of our analysis permit to emphasize the impor- tance of family context in the access to Rdp and the relevance of the family assistants on farm’s propensity to get funded.

Suggested Citation

  • De Rosa, Marcello & Bartoli, Luca, 2016. "Adoption of rural development policies in rural areas of Italy: between family and farm strategy," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 17(2), June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aergaa:262441
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.262441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262441/files/17_2_5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/262441/files/17_2_5.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.262441?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pesquin, Claudio & Kimhi, Ayal & Kislev, Yoav, 1999. "Old Age Security and Inter-Generational Transfer of Family Farms," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 26(1), pages 19-37, March.
    2. Susan Offutt, 2002. "The Future of Farm Policy Analysis: A Household Perspective," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(5), pages 1189-1200.
    3. Alain Fayolle, 2014. "Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship : What We Know and What We Need to Know," Post-Print hal-02298201, HAL.
    4. Roberto Henke, 2007. "Firm typologies and support policies in Italian agriculture," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 2, May.
    5. Coggan, Anthea & Whitten, Stuart M. & Bennett, Jeff, 2010. "Influences of transaction costs in environmental policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1777-1784, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agnieszka Kurdys-Kujawska & Agnieszka Sompolska-Rzechula, 2020. "Subsidization of Entrepreneurship in Rural Areas in Poland: Scale, Effects and Regional Diversity," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 246-263.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanson, Kenneth & Somwaru, Agapi, 2003. "Distributional Effects of U.S. Farm Commodity Programs: Accounting for Farm and Non-Farm Households," Conference papers 331120, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    2. Yann de Mey & Erwin Wauters & Dierk Schmid & Markus Lips & Mark Vancauteren & Steven Van Passel, 2016. "Farm household risk balancing: empirical evidence from Switzerland," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 43(4), pages 637-662.
    3. McCann, Laura, 2013. "Transaction costs and environmental policy design," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 253-262.
    4. Phan, Thu-Ha Dang & Brouwer, Roy & Hoang, Long Phi & Davidson, Marc David, 2017. "A comparative study of transaction costs of payments for forest ecosystem services in Vietnam," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 141-149.
    5. Kwok, Yun-Kwong, 2004. "Global factor trade with differentiated factor prices and factor intensities," Conference papers 331173, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    6. Lundmark, Robert, 2022. "Time-adjusted transaction costs for energy renovations for single-family house-owners," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Madior Fall & Muriel Roger, 2008. "L’impact de la réforme de 1990 sur les décisions de départ à la retraite des exploitants agricoles français," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 89(4), pages 29-53.
    8. Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge & Mishra, Ashok K. & Nehring, Richard F. & Hendricks, Chad & Southern, Malaya & Gregory, Alexandra, 2007. "Off-Farm Income, Technology Adoption, And Farm Economic Performance," Economic Research Report 7234, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Glauben, Thomas & Tietje, Hendrik & Weiss, Christoph R., 2002. "Intergenerational Succession on Family Farms: Evidence from Survey Data," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24918, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Supalla, Ray, 2002. "Is Today’s Agricultural Policy the Appropriate Approach to Meeting the Needs of Rural Farm Families?," Cornhusker Economics 306266, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    11. Lai, Lawrence W.C. & Chau, K.W. & Lorne, Frank T., 2016. "The rise and fall of the sand monopoly in colonial Hong Kong," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 106-116.
    12. Ayal Kimhi & Ray Bollman, 1999. "Family farm dynamics in Canada and Israel: the case of farm exits," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 21(1), pages 69-79, August.
    13. Ratan J. S. Dheer & Len J. Treviño, 2022. "Explaining the rate of opportunity compared to necessity entrepreneurship in a cross-cultural context: Analysis and policy implications," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 29-55, March.
    14. Bellanger, Manuel & Fonner, Robert & Holland, Daniel S. & Libecap, Gary D. & Lipton, Douglas W. & Scemama, Pierre & Speir, Cameron & Thébaud, Olivier, 2021. "Cross-sectoral externalities related to natural resources and ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    15. Baudry, Marc & Faure, Anouk & Quemin, Simon, 2021. "Emissions trading with transaction costs," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    16. Mishra, Ashok K. & El-Osta, Hisham S. & Johnson, James D., 2004. "Succession In Family Farm Business: Empirical Evidence From The U.S. Farm Sector," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20114, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Miranda, Bruno Varella & de Oliveira, Gustavo Magalhães, 2023. "Assessing the performance of voluntary environmental agreements under high monitoring costs: Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    18. Sironen, Susanna & Primmer, Eeva & Leskinen, Pekka & Similä, Jukka & Punttila, Pekka, 2020. "Context sensitive policy instruments: A multi-criteria decision analysis for safeguarding forest habitats in Southwestern Finland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    19. Fabian Joas & Christian Flachsland, 2016. "The (ir)relevance of transaction costs in climate policy instrument choice: an analysis of the EU and the US," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 26-49, January.
    20. Tietje, Hendrik, 2003. "Hofnachfolgesituation in Deutschland: Eine empirische Analyse von Querschnittsdaten auf Kreisebene," FE Working Papers 0301, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Food Economics and Consumption Studies.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aergaa:262441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/etagrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.