IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/agr/journl/vxxiiiy2016i2(607)p47-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Axiomatical examination of the neoclassical economic model. Logical assessment of the assumptions of neoclassical economic model

Author

Listed:
  • Ada MARINESCU

    (The School of Advanced Studies of the Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

We analyze in this paper the main assumptions of the neoclassical theory, considered as axioms, like the rationality of the economic actor, equilibrium of the markets, perfect information or methodological instrumentalism. Attempts to apply to formalism in economy are related to expressing human behaviors in mathematical models and to identifying strict causalities or necessities in the structure of economic behavior. Rationality is a model which supposes that all actors act always by following the pattern of maximization and makes behavior predictable. We consider that the basic principle on which this theory is build is actually human rationality. The individual action which strictly conforms to the principles of optimizing rationality is the most primitive level from which we can deduce the whole structure of neoclassical economic theory. The neoclassical deductive system is based on the axiom of individual universal rationality. If we analyze logically this theoretical construction, we reach the conclusion that rational behavior, which means choosing based on a function of optimum, has the potential to explain all economic phenomenon, at least in an abstract and theoretical manner. It explains the behavior of an ideal agent and of an ideal economy, and its extreme generality makes it a universal principle. Correspondence with reality matters less in this strictly abstract approach compared to the possibility to build a coherent and convincing system. The proposal and axiomatic derivation of formal models was equivalent to discovering a simplified structure, obviously reductive, of the reality, but which offered through its universality the possibility of unitary interpretation of economic phenomenon. Thus the need to offer sure, stable and general foundations characterizes the neoclassical approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Ada MARINESCU, 2016. "Axiomatical examination of the neoclassical economic model. Logical assessment of the assumptions of neoclassical economic model," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(2(607), S), pages 47-64, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:xxiii:y:2016:i:2(607):p:47-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://store.ectap.ro/articole/1181.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ectap.ro/articol.php?id=1181&rid=123
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tony Lawson, 2013. "What is this 'school' called neoclassical economics?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 37(5), pages 947-983.
    2. David Colander, 2009. "Complexity and the History of Economic Thought," Chapters, in: J. Barkley Rosser Jr. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Complexity, chapter 16, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. David Colander, 2018. "The Death Of Neoclassical Economics," Chapters, in: How Economics Should Be Done, chapter 5, pages 46-62, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Friedman, Milton, 1966. "Essays in Positive Economics," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9780226264035, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Colander, 2000. "New Millennium Economics: How Did It Get This Way, and What Way Is It?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 121-132, Winter.
    2. Amitava Krishna Dutt, 2015. "Uncertainty, power, institutions, and crisis: implications for economic analysis and the future of capitalism," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 3(1), pages 9-28, January.
    3. Adem LEVENT, 2016. "Power, Market and Techno-Structure in John Kenneth Galbraith’s Thought," Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, KSP Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 214-218, June.
    4. Jeffrey C. Ely, 2011. "Kludged," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 3(3), pages 210-231, August.
    5. Klaus Wälde, 2016. "Emotion Research in Economics," Working Papers 1611, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    6. Joanna Dzionek-Kozlowska, 2013. "Ekonomia jako nauka pozytywna. Refleksje na marginesie 'Ekonomii dobra i zla' Tomasa Sedlacka/Economics as a Positive Science. Reflections after Reading Thomas Sedlacek’s 'Economics of Good and Evil’," Annales. Ethics in Economic Life, University of Lodz, Faculty of Economics and Sociology, vol. 16(1), pages 335-344, May.
    7. repec:fgv:epgrbe:v:66:n:3:a:1 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Annarita Colasante & Simone Alfarano & Eva Camacho-Cuena, 2020. "Heuristic Switching Model and Exploration-Exploitation Algorithm to Describe Long-Run Expectations in LtFEs: a Comparison," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 56(3), pages 623-658, October.
    9. Carlos A. Rodríguez, 2018. "Fuentes de las fluctuaciones macroeconómicas en Puerto Rico\Sources of macroeconomic fluctuations in Puerto Rico," Estudios Económicos, El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos, vol. 33(2), pages 219-252.
    10. Karbowski, Adam, 2019. "Analiza otoczenia instytucjonalnego systemu tworzenia wiedzy w krajach Europy Środkowej [Analysis of the institutional environment of the knowledge subsystem in Central Europe]," MPRA Paper 95570, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2019.
    11. Teresa Kupczyk & Marta Kusterka-Jefmanska & Elwira Gross-Golacka, 2021. "COVID-19 Pandemic as an Agent of Change in the Use of Job Recruitment Information Sources by the Generation Born Since 2000," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 785-799.
    12. Jesus Munoz, 2011. "Orthodox versus Heterodox (Minskyan) Perspectives of Financial Crises: Explosion in the 1990s versus Implosion in the 2000s," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_695, Levy Economics Institute.
    13. Kevin Maréchal & Hélène Aubaret-Joachain & Jean-Paul Ledant, 2008. "The influence of Economics on agricultural systems: an evolutionary and ecological perspective," Working Papers CEB 08-028.RS, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    14. Seif I. Tag El-Din, 1992. "Debt and Equity in a Primary Financial Market: A Theory with Islamic Implications سندات الدين والأسهم في سوق مالية أولية ـ نظريتها ودلالاتها الإسلامية," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 4(1), pages 3-34, January.
    15. Veneziani, Roberto & Yoshihara, Naoki, 2014. "One million miles to go: taking the axiomatic road to defining exploitation," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2014-10, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
    16. Jan‐Erik Lane & Reinert Maeland, 2006. "International Organisation as Coordination in N‐Person Games," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 54(1), pages 185-215, March.
    17. Phil Faulkner & Stephen Pratten & Jochen Runde, 2017. "Cambridge Social Ontology: Clarification, Development and Deployment," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 41(5), pages 1265-1277.
    18. Wieliczko, Barbara, 2020. "Suitability of Complexity Economics for Long-Term Agricultural Policy-Making," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 311259, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    19. Peter A. F. Fraser‐Mackenzie & Tiejun Ma & Ming‐Chien Sung & Johnnie E. V. Johnson, 2019. "Let's Call it Quits: Break‐Even Effects in the Decision to Stop Taking Risks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(7), pages 1560-1581, July.
    20. Wang, Lijian & Béland, Daniel & Zhang, Sifeng, 2014. "Pension fairness in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 25-36.
    21. Giancarlo Ianulardo & Aldo Stella, 2022. "Towards a unity of sense: A critical analysis of the concept of relation in methodological individualism and holism in Economics," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 15(1), pages 196-226.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:xxiii:y:2016:i:2(607):p:47-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mircea Dinu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agerrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.