IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/agr/journl/v4(637)y2023i4(637)p291-298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relationship between google trends search and energy commodity prices

Author

Listed:
  • Sakthivel SANTHOSHKUMAR

    (Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, India)

  • Murugesan SELVAM

    (Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, India)

  • Balasundram MANIAM

    (Sam Houston State University, Texas, USA)

Abstract

An attempt has been made in the study to examine the relationship between Google Trends Search and prices of Energy Commodity. This study used daily time series data for a period of five years from 01.01.2016 to 31.12.2020. The descriptive statistics revealed that the data on Google and Energy Commodities were normally distributed. The correlation analysis showed that there was positive relationship between the sample variables, namely, Google Search and prices of Energy Commodities (crude oil, crude oil mini, natural gas and natural gas mini). The findings of the study would be useful to the investors and other participants of commodities markets, by understanding the influence of Google Trends Search on the prices Energy Commodities.

Suggested Citation

  • Sakthivel SANTHOSHKUMAR & Murugesan SELVAM & Balasundram MANIAM, 2023. "The relationship between google trends search and energy commodity prices," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(4(637), W), pages 291-298, Winter.
    • Handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:4(637):y:2023:i:4(637):p:291-298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://store.ectap.ro/articole/1715.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ectap.ro/articol.php?id=1715&rid=153
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De Long, J Bradford & Andrei Shleifer & Lawrence H. Summers & Robert J. Waldmann, 1990. "Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 98(4), pages 703-738, August.
    2. Bijl, Laurens & Kringhaug, Glenn & Molnár, Peter & Sandvik, Eirik, 2016. "Google searches and stock returns," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 150-156.
    3. Ran Duchin & Thomas Gilbert & Jarrad Harford & Christopher Hrdlicka, 2017. "Precautionary Savings with Risky Assets: When Cash Is Not Cash," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 72(2), pages 793-852, April.
    4. Saunders, Edward M, Jr, 1993. "Stock Prices and Wall Street Weather," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(5), pages 1337-1345, December.
    5. Kasilingam Lingaraja & Murugesan Selvam & Sankaran Venkateswar, 2015. "An Empirical Examination of Returns on Select Asian Stock Market Indices," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 5(2), pages 1-7.
    6. Kim, Neri & Lučivjanská, Katarína & Molnár, Peter & Villa, Roviel, 2019. "Google searches and stock market activity: Evidence from Norway," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 208-220.
    7. Takeda, Fumiko & Wakao, Takumi, 2014. "Google search intensity and its relationship with returns and trading volume of Japanese stocks," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 1-18.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tihana Škrinjarić, 2019. "Time Varying Spillovers between the Online Search Volume and Stock Returns: Case of CESEE Markets," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-30, October.
    2. Christophe Desagre & Catherine D'Hondt, 2020. "Googlization and retail investors' trading activity," LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN 2020004, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    3. Hervé, Fabrice & Zouaoui, Mohamed & Belvaux, Bertrand, 2019. "Noise traders and smart money: Evidence from online searches," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 141-149.
    4. Afees A. Salisu & Ahamuefula E. Ogbonna & Idris Adediran, 2021. "Stock‐induced Google trends and the predictability of sectoral stock returns," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(2), pages 327-345, March.
    5. Duc Dang Thi Viet & Hoai Nguyen Thu & Nguyen Van Phuoc & Nguyen Dang Phong & Anh Nguyen Huong & Hai Ho Hong, 2024. "Google Search intensity and stock returns in frontier markets: Evidence from the Vietnamese market," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 30-56, April.
    6. Ekinci, Cumhur & Bulut, Ali Eray, 2021. "Google search and stock returns: A study on BIST 100 stocks," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    7. Salisu, Afees A. & Ogbonna, Ahamuefula E. & Adewuyi, Adeolu, 2020. "Google trends and the predictability of precious metals," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    8. Desagre, Christophe & D’Hondt, Catherine, 2021. "Googlization and retail trading activity," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    9. Chen, Zhongdong & Craig, Karen Ann, 2023. "Active attention, retail investor base, and stock returns," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    10. Salisu, Afees A. & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2021. "Firm-specific news and the predictability of Consumer stocks in Vietnam," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    11. Cheraghali, Hamid & Høydal, Hannah & Lysebo, Caroline & Molnár, Peter, 2023. "Consumer attention and company performance: Evidence from luxury companies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PA).
    12. Szymon Lis, 2022. "Investor Sentiment in Asset Pricing Models: A Review," Working Papers 2022-14, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    13. Khaskheli, Asadullah & Zhang, Hongyu & Raza, Syed Ali & Khan, Komal Akram, 2022. "Assessing the influence of news indicator on volatility of precious metals prices through GARCH-MIDAS model: A comparative study of pre and during COVID-19 period," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    14. Stefano DellaVigna, 2009. "Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(2), pages 315-372, June.
    15. Omid Zamani & Thomas Bittmann & Jens‐Peter Loy, 2024. "Does the internet bring food prices closer together? Exploring search engine query data in Iran," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 688-715, June.
    16. Takumi Ito & Motoki Masuda & Ayaka Naito & Fumiko Takeda, 2021. "Application of Google Trends‐based sentiment index in exchange rate prediction," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(7), pages 1154-1178, November.
    17. Song, Yingjie & Ji, Qiang & Du, Ya-Juan & Geng, Jiang-Bo, 2019. "The dynamic dependence of fossil energy, investor sentiment and renewable energy stock markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    18. Siganos, Antonios & Vagenas-Nanos, Evangelos & Verwijmeren, Patrick, 2014. "Facebook's daily sentiment and international stock markets," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 107(PB), pages 730-743.
    19. Massimiliano Castellani & Pierpaolo Pattitoni & Roberto Patuelli, 2015. "Abnormal Returns of Soccer Teams," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 16(7), pages 735-759, October.
    20. Papadamou, Stephanos & Fassas, Athanasios P. & Kenourgios, Dimitris & Dimitriou, Dimitrios, 2023. "Effects of the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic on implied stock market volatility: International evidence using a google trend measure," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:4(637):y:2023:i:4(637):p:291-298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mircea Dinu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agerrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.