IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/infoec/v20y2016i1p7-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Business Intelligence Based Business Process Management Challenge

Author

Listed:
  • Oliver KOPF
  • Daniel HOMOCIANU

Abstract

The present paper is trying to bring some solid arguments concerning the common part, the relation and a few limitations when trying to bring together two recent fields of interest, namely Business Intelligence and Business Process Management. The approach is new only in terms of number and combination of reasons and the references are meant to support our ideas when trying to explain certain features. The entire content of the paper is based on putting together relevant theoretical ideas from the literature and some conclusions derived from the experience of authors and other industry representatives with different kinds of technologies and tools with many applications in these fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliver KOPF & Daniel HOMOCIANU, 2016. "The Business Intelligence Based Business Process Management Challenge," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(1), pages 7-19.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:20:y:2016:i:1:p:7-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistaie.ase.ro/content/77/01%20-%20Kopf,%20Homocianu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Homocianu Daniel & Airinei Dinu, 2013. "Business Intelligence From E -Connotations to Technological Trends," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 60(2), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Elbashir, Mohamed Z. & Collier, Philip A. & Davern, Michael J., 2008. "Measuring the effects of business intelligence systems: The relationship between business process and organizational performance," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 135-153.
    3. Catalin STRIMBEI & Octavian DOSPINESCU & Roxana-Marina STRAINU & Alexandra NISTOR, 2015. "Software Architectures – Present and Visions," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(4), pages 13-27.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniel Homocianu & Dinu Airinei, 2022. "PCDM and PCDM4MP: New Pairwise Correlation-Based Data Mining Tools for Parallel Processing of Large Tabular Datasets," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-27, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erkan Bayraktar & Ekrem Tatoglu & Arafat Salih Aydiner & Dursun Delen, 2024. "Business Analytics Adoption and Technological Intensity: An Efficiency Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 1509-1526, August.
    2. Ahmed Saleh Al-Matari & Rozita Amiruddin & Khairul Azman Aziz & Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi, 2022. "The Impact of Dynamic Accounting Information System on Organizational Resilience: The Mediating Role of Business Processes Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Peters, Matt D. & Wieder, Bernhard & Sutton, Steve G., 2018. "Organizational improvisation and the reduced usefulness of performance measurement BI functionalities," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 1-15.
    4. Ashrafi, Amir & Zare Ravasan, Ahad & Trkman, Peter & Afshari, Samira, 2019. "The role of business analytics capabilities in bolstering firms’ agility and performance," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 1-15.
    5. Mareike Bergmann & Christian Brück & Thorsten Knauer & Anja Schwering, 2020. "Digitization of the budgeting process: determinants of the use of business analytics and its effect on satisfaction with the budgeting process," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 25-54, April.
    6. Aydiner, Arafat Salih & Tatoglu, Ekrem & Bayraktar, Erkan & Zaim, Selim & Delen, Dursun, 2019. "Business analytics and firm performance: The mediating role of business process performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 228-237.
    7. Florian Stroh & Robert Winter & Felix Wortmann, 2011. "Method Support of Information Requirements Analysis for Analytical Information Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 3(1), pages 33-43, February.
    8. Mayank Kejriwal & Pedro Szekely, 2019. "myDIG: Personalized Illicit Domain-Specific Knowledge Discovery with No Programming," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Bernhard Wieder & Maria-Luise Ossimitz & Peter Chamoni, 2012. "The Impact of Business Intelligence Tools on Performance: A User Satisfaction Paradox?," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 5(3), pages 7-32, December.
    10. Michele Galeotti & Stefano Garzella & Raffaele Fiorentino & Gaetano della Corte, 2016. "The Strategic Intelligence implications for Information Systems," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(1), pages 105-123.
    11. Andrea Dobrosavljević & Snežana Urošević & Milovan Vuković & Miroslav Talijan & Dragan Marinković, 2020. "Evaluation of Process Orientation Dimensions in the Apparel Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Hou, Chung-Kuang, 2012. "Examining the effect of user satisfaction on system usage and individual performance with business intelligence systems: An empirical study of Taiwan's electronics industry," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 560-573.
    13. Wan Zuriati Wan Zakaria & Norazlina Ilias & Norlidawahi Wahab, 2017. "A Survey on the Impact of Accounting Information System on Tasks Efficiency: Evidence from Malaysian Public Sector Agencies," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 183-190.
    14. Lee, Lorraine & Petter, Stacie & Fayard, Dutch & Robinson, Shani, 2011. "On the use of partial least squares path modeling in accounting research," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 305-328.
    15. Ferdi Sönmez, 2018. "Technology Acceptance of Business Intelligence and Customer Relationship Management Systems within Institutions Operating in Capital Markets," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(2), pages 400-422, February.
    16. Mohammad Reza Seddigh & Sajjad Shokouhyar & Fatemeh Loghmani, 2023. "Approaching towards sustainable supply chain under the spotlight of business intelligence," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 937-970, May.
    17. Mohammad Husam Odeh, 2019. "Factors Affecting the Adoption of Financial Information Systems Based on UTAUT Model," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 9(2), pages 108-116, April.
    18. Laura Barna & Bogdan Ionescu, 2021. "The Impact Of Accounting Information Systems On Understanding Business Processes," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 164-170, July.
    19. Md. Mominur Rahman, 2023. "The Effect of Business Intelligence on Bank Operational Efficiency and Perceptions of Profitability," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-21, February.
    20. Khallaf, Ashraf, 2012. "Information technology investments and nonfinancial measures: A research framework," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 109-121.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:20:y:2016:i:1:p:7-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paul Pocatilu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.