IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/icmbdj/v2y2016i1p43-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Traits of Marketing Strategy Approaches: The Latte Arborea Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Moreno Frau

    (University of Cagliari)

  • Francesca Cabiddu

    (University of Cagliari)

Abstract

In the marketing literature there are three main approaches related to strategy: the outside-in, inside-out and mixed approach. Although many researchers have given their contributions to this field of research, there are no studies that fully identify and define the distinctive characteristics of these three perspectives. Moreover, there is a lack of empirical studies on firms marketing strategy approaches. For these reasons, this article has two different objectives: 1) identify and describe the main characteristics of the three approaches and hierarchically structure them in a theoretical framework; 2) provide an empirical qualitative contribution to the marketing strategy debate (Latte Arborea case study). In order to achieve the first objective, we used a conceptual matrix (Webster and Watson, 2002) to locate the most quoted characteristics by the literature. Then, we discarded the less frequently quoted characteristics and joined some other similar ones that can be used together. The result is a theoretical framework which shows the hierarchical relationship between characteristics and their affiliation to the three approaches. For the second objective, we used a qualitative in depth single case study (Yin 1994; Dubois & Gadde 2002). The firm we studied is Latte Arborea, which is a leading company in the dairy industry within the Sardinian market (Italy). Data were collected from three sources: semi-structured interviews, Latte Arborea’ social media and website (Dubé and Paré 2003). All the transcriptions coming from the data sources were uploaded and coded using the tools of Nvivo10. We based the semi-structured interview protocol on our theoretical framework and through the answers of the interviewees and the other data sources, we were able to identify Latte Arborea’s characteristics in developing its marketing strategies. The result of this research is a managerial diagnosis tool which allows firms to identify their marketing strategy approach and their eventual problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Moreno Frau & Francesca Cabiddu, 2016. "Exploring the Traits of Marketing Strategy Approaches: The Latte Arborea Case Study," International Conference on Marketing and Business Development Journal, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 2(1), pages 43-60, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:icmbdj:v:2:y:2016:i:1:p:43-60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mbd.ase.ro/RePEc/aes/icmbdj/2016/ICMBD_V2_2016_22.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Humbert, Marc & Jolly, Dominique & Thérin, François, 1997. "Building strategy on technological resources and commercial proactiveness: The Gemplus case," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 658-666, December.
    2. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    3. Burmann, Christoph & Jost-Benz, Marc & Riley, Nicola, 2009. "Towards an identity-based brand equity model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 390-397, March.
    4. Oliver E. Williamson, 1991. "Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(S2), pages 75-94, December.
    5. James G. March & Lee S. Sproull & Michal Tamuz, 1991. "Learning from Samples of One or Fewer," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, February.
    6. Shelby D. Hunt, 2011. "Developing successful theories in marketing: insights from resource-advantage theory," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 1(2), pages 72-84, June.
    7. Jeffrey S. Conant & Michael P. Mokwa & P. Rajan Varadarajan, 1990. "Strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance: A multiple measures‐based study," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(5), pages 365-383, September.
    8. Urde, Mats & Baumgarth, Carsten & Merrilees, Bill, 2013. "Brand orientation and market orientation — From alternatives to synergy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 13-20.
    9. Dubois, Anna & Gadde, Lars-Erik, 2002. "Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 553-560, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Moreno Frau & Ludovica Moi & Francesca Cabiddu, 2020. "Outside-in, Inside-out, and Blended Marketing Strategy Approach: A Longitudinal Case Study," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(3), pages 1-1, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moreno Frau & Ludovica Moi & Francesca Cabiddu, 2020. "Outside-in, Inside-out, and Blended Marketing Strategy Approach: A Longitudinal Case Study," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(3), pages 1-1, September.
    2. Davcik, Nebojsa S. & Sharma, Piyush, 2016. "Marketing resources, performance, and competitive advantage: A review and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5547-5552.
    3. Mónica Monteiro & Álvaro Rosa & Adelaide Martins & Shital Jayantilal, 2023. "Grounded Theory—An Illustrative Application in the Portuguese Footwear Industry," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Kazadi, Kande & Lievens, Annouk & Mahr, Dominik, 2016. "Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 525-540.
    5. Pramod Iyer & Arezoo Davari & Audhesh Paswan, 2018. "Determinants of brand performance: the role of internal branding," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(3), pages 202-216, May.
    6. Malik, Omar R., 2008. "Adapting to market liberalization: The role of dynamic capabilities, initial resource conditions, and strategic path choices in determining evolutionary fitness of Less Developed Country (LDC) firms," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 217-231, September.
    7. Chan, Jin Hooi & Reiner, David, 2019. "Evolution in inter-firm governance along the transport biofuel value chain in Maritime Silk Road countries," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 268-282.
    8. Patnaik, Swetketu & Munjal, Surender & Varma, Arup & Sinha, Sujay, 2022. "Extending the resource-based view through the lens of the institution-based view: A longitudinal case study of an Indian higher educational institution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 124-141.
    9. Kindström, Daniel & Kowalkowski, Christian & Sandberg, Erik, 2013. "Enabling service innovation: A dynamic capabilities approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1063-1073.
    10. Pattanayak, Sirsha & Ramkumar, M. & Goswami, Mohit & Rana, Nripendra P., 2024. "Blockchain technology and supply chain performance: The role of trust and relational capabilities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    11. Schriber, Svante & Löwstedt, Jan, 2015. "Tangible resources and the development of organizational capabilities," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 54-68.
    12. Luigi Cantone & Pierpaolo Testa & Svend Hollensen & Giuseppe Fabio Cantone, 2019. "Outsourcing New Product Development Fostered By Disruptive Technological Innovation: A Decision-Making Model," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(01), pages 1-45, January.
    13. William P. Barnett & Elizabeth G. Pontikes, 2008. "The Red Queen, Success Bias, and Organizational Inertia," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(7), pages 1237-1251, July.
    14. Birgitte Grøgaard & Helene Loe Colman & Inger G Stensaker, 2022. "Legitimizing, leveraging, and launching: Developing dynamic capabilities in the MNE," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(4), pages 636-656, June.
    15. Maurizio Zollo, 2009. "Superstitious Learning with Rare Strategic Decisions: Theory and Evidence from Corporate Acquisitions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 894-908, October.
    16. Raja, Jawwad Z. & Frandsen, Thomas & Mouritsen, Jan, 2017. "Exploring the managerial dilemmas encountered by advanced analytical equipment providers in developing service-led growth strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 120-132.
    17. Katsuki Aoki & Miriam Wilhelm, 2017. "The Role of Ambidexterity in Managing Buyer–Supplier Relationships: The Toyota Case," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 1080-1097, December.
    18. Nicholas Argyres, 2011. "Using Organizational Economics to Study Organizational Capability Development and Strategy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1138-1143, October.
    19. Manisha Mathur, 2022. "Who pulls the strings: firm strategy or firm environment in controlling firm risk?," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(4), pages 341-359, December.
    20. David H. Hsu & Kwanghui Lim, 2014. "Knowledge Brokering and Organizational Innovation: Founder Imprinting Effects," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1134-1153, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    outside-in approach; inside-out approach; mixed approach; marketing strategies; case study;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:icmbdj:v:2:y:2016:i:1:p:43-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucian Onisor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.