IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/icafee/v4y2015p202-210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of european funds for agriculture and rural development in europe: a comparative perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Mavrodin

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The Structural and Cohesion Funds, as well as the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (forming the Common Agricultural Policy), constitute the main part of the total EU spending, aimed at helping the poorer regions of Europe and reducing the sometimes huge differences between European countries or regions in terms of income, wealth and opportunities. Although all the European Union’s member countries benefit from these funds in accordance with an allocation algorithm, they have not worked with the same efficiency, leaving a part of Europe less wealthy and underdeveloped than others. The present paper will try to examine the role of these funds for the agricultural growth in different countries of EU, with a special emphasis on Romania.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Mavrodin, 2015. "The role of european funds for agriculture and rural development in europe: a comparative perspective," International Conference on Competitiveness of Agro-food and Environmental Economy Proceedings, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 4, pages 202-210.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:icafee:v:4:y:2015:p:202-210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cafee.ase.ro/wp-content/upload/2015edition/file2015(22).pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kazukauskas, Andrius & Newman, Carol F., 2010. "CAP reform and its impact on structural change and productivity growth: A cross country analysis," 114th Seminar, April 15-16, 2010, Berlin, Germany 61103, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paun Cristian & Ivascu Cosmin, 2021. "The impact of EU’s financial support on the agriculture’s development: a panel data analysis," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 16(2), pages 86-100, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marie-Noelle Duquenne & Maria Tsiapa & Valantis Tsiakos, 2019. "Contribution of the Common Agricultural Policy to agricultural productivity of EU regions during 2004–2012 period," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 100(1), pages 47-68, December.
    2. Loizou, Efstratios & Karelakis, Christos & Galanopoulos, Konstantinos & Mattas, Konstadinos, 2019. "The role of agriculture as a development tool for a regional economy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 482-490.
    3. Jaraite, Jurate & Kažukauskas, Andrius, 2011. "The effect of mandatory agro-environmental policy on farm environmental performance," CERE Working Papers 2011:13, CERE - the Center for Environmental and Resource Economics.
    4. Bumbescu Sorina Simona, 2020. "Analysis of Economic Performance in Agriculture Using Econometric Modeling," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 30(3), pages 118-128, September.
    5. Arovuori, Kyösti & Yrjölä, Tapani, 2015. "The impact of the CAP and its reforms on the productivity growth in agriculture," 147th Seminar, October 7-8, 2015, Sofia, Bulgaria 212241, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Liyun Zhu & Alfons Oude Lansink, 2022. "Dynamic sustainable productivity growth of Dutch dairy farming," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Wei Wang & Chongmei Zhang & Jiahao Song & Dingde Xu, 2021. "The Impact of Target Price Policy on Cotton Cultivation: Analysis of County-Level Panel Data from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:icafee:v:4:y:2015:p:202-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Elena Preda (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.