IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v26y2024i67p957.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Sturgeon Aquaculture

Author

Listed:
  • Dragos Sebastian Cristea

    (Dunarea de Jos University of Gala?i, Romania)

  • Alexandru Adrian Gavrila

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Stefan Mihai Petrea

    (Dunarea de Jos University of Gala?i, Romania)

  • Dan Munteanu

    (Dunarea de Jos University of Gala?i, Romania)

  • Sofia David

    (Dunarea de Jos University of Gala?i, Romania)

  • Catalin Octavian Manescu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

This paper presents the experience and lessons learned in a pilot project aimed at integrating artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in sturgeon aquaculture. The project used convolutional neural networks and visual intelligence for the evaluation of fish biomass and the optimisation of sturgeon rearing technologies in integrated multitrophic production systems. Similar solutions have been used before to determine the biomass of other fish species, but this is the first documentation of the application of such a solution for sturgeons. The application challenges were significant, which was determined by the special morphological peculiarities of the sturgeons (shape, way of swimming, their dimensions). Both YOLACT technology and a computer vision context were tested using LAB and HSV colour spaces to estimate fish biomass based on imaging data. It was found that the LAB colour space provided superior results in terms of precision and efficiency, but maximum accuracy was achieved using convolutional neural networks (YOLACT). The analysis of the project results confirms the significant advantages of using the AI system for biomass monitoring, advantages consisting of the reduction of unit costs with labour and feed, improvement of water quality, active optimisation of sturgeon growing conditions. In this way, conditions are created for the sustainable growth of sturgeon production, both for consumption and for the restocking of various aquatic ecosystems with brood. It also proves that the large-scale implementation of AI-based technologies in the fisheries industry can make an important contribution to the achievement of Romania s National Multiannual Aquaculture Strategic Plan 2022-2030, as well as to the implementation of the European Union s strategies on food security and biodiversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Dragos Sebastian Cristea & Alexandru Adrian Gavrila & Stefan Mihai Petrea & Dan Munteanu & Sofia David & Catalin Octavian Manescu, 2024. "The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Sturgeon Aquaculture," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(67), pages 957-957, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:26:y:2024:i:67:p:957
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3346.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cristina Venera GEAMBASU & Iulia JIANU & Ionel JIANU & Alexandru GAVRILA, 2011. "Influence Factors for the Choice of a Software Development Methodology," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 10(4), pages 479-494, December.
    2. Lavinia-Andreea GRUIA & Nicolae BIBU & Marian NASTASE & Alexandru ROJA & Nicoleta CRISTACHE, 2020. "Approaches to Digitalization within Organizations and Romania," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(3), pages 287-297, July.
    3. Cristina Venera Tartavulea & Catalin Nicolae Albu & Nadia Albu & Ramona Iulia Dieaconescu & Silvia Petre, 2020. "Online Teaching Practices and the Effectiveness of the Educational Process in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(55), pages 920-920, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monica Ioana Burcă-Voicu & Romana Emilia Cramarenco & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2022. "Investigating Learners’ Teaching Format Preferences during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Empirical Investigation on an Emerging Market," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Noof M. AlQashouti & Mohammed Yaqot & Brenno C. Menezes, 2024. "Online Learning and Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Higher Education in Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-29, March.
    3. Rumpa Roy & Mujeeb Saif Mohsen Al-Absy, 2022. "Impact of Critical Factors on the Effectiveness of Online Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-12, October.
    4. Alexandra IOSIFESCU & Constanta POPESCU, 2022. "The Determining Factors of Work Motivation for the Generations of Employees," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 205-210.
    5. Ramona Iulia Ţarţavulea & Radu Ioan Petrariu, 2013. "Logistics Market Statistics and Opinions about the Supply Chain Management in Romania," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(33), pages 180-196, February.
    6. Andreja Mihailović & Julija Cerović Smolović & Ivan Radević & Neli Rašović & Nikola Martinović, 2021. "COVID-19 and Beyond: Employee Perceptions of the Efficiency of Teleworking and Its Cybersecurity Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    7. Andrei Bobocea & Razvan Bologa & Lorena Batagan & Bogdan-Stefan Posedaru, 2024. "Architecture to Transform Classic Academic Courses into Adaptive Learning Flows with Artificial Intelligence," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(65), pages 363-363, February.
    8. Vlad I. Bocanet & Ken Brown & Anne Uukkivi & Filomena Soares & Ana Paula Lopes & Anna Cellmer & Carles Serrat & Cristina Feniser & Florina M. Serdean & Elena Safiulina & Gerald Kelly & Joanna Cymerman, 2021. "Change in Gap Perception within Current Practices in Assessing Students Learning Mathematics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, April.
    9. Ramy A. Rahimi & Grace S. Oh, 2024. "Rethinking the role of educators in the 21st century: navigating globalization, technology, and pandemics," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(2), pages 182-197, June.
    10. ȚARȚAVULEA (DIEACONESCU) Ramona Iulia, 2015. "Model for Determining the Optimum Location for Performance Improvement in Supply-Chain Strategies," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 01, March.
    11. Abi Saad, Elie & Tremblay, Nathalie & Agogué, Marine, 2024. "A multi-level perspective on innovation intermediaries: The case of the diffusion of digital technologies in healthcare," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    12. Dragomir, Voicu D. & Dumitru, Mădălina, 2023. "Two years into the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of learning outcomes and student engagement at an economics university," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    13. Toshiyuki Hasumi & Mei-Shiu Chiu, 2022. "Online mathematics education as bio-eco-techno process: bibliometric analysis using co-authorship and bibliographic coupling," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(8), pages 4631-4654, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    artificial intelligence; deep learning; fishery industry; process optimisation; sustainability;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q22 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Fishery
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:26:y:2024:i:67:p:957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.