IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v22y2020i55p792.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Internationalization of SMEs in Central Europe and Its Impact on Their Methods of Risk Management

Author

Listed:
  • Zuzana Virglerova

    (Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Czech Republic)

  • Muhammad Asif Khan

    (University of Kotli, Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan)

  • Raimonda Martinkute-Kauliene

    (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Lithuania)

  • Sandor Kovacs

    (University of Debrecen, Hungary)

Abstract

The international business environment is very competitive, and enterprises should be aware of how to manage business risks, which methods to choose, and what impact these risks have on the sustainability of these methods and on the whole system. The aim of this article is to analyse the impact of the internationalization of SMEs on risk management and define the differences in perceptions of the importance of sustainability regarding this system. Data from an extensive research study in V4 countries (Czech Republic, Hungary Slovakia, Poland) were analysed. Data were collected through on-line questionnaire in 2018, and a total of 1781 valid responses by SMEs were included in this research. To fulfil the research aim, three hypotheses were established. The odds ratio was calculated for the effect of company type (international x domestic) on the different individuals responsible for risk management. The Tarantula similarity measure was calculated to measure the strength and pairwise relationships between risk reducing strategies and risk management techniques. The Chi-Square test was applied to assess differences between variables. The results show that a specialized risk manager is authorized to deal with risk management in international companies more often than in domestic companies. There are also differences in the relationship between risk managing techniques and risk reducing strategies, depending on the presence of the business on international market. Companies in the international market are more focused on methods of risk management which support sustainability and their system of risk management has a more stable future.

Suggested Citation

  • Zuzana Virglerova & Muhammad Asif Khan & Raimonda Martinkute-Kauliene & Sandor Kovacs, 2020. "The Internationalization of SMEs in Central Europe and Its Impact on Their Methods of Risk Management," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(55), pages 792-792, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:22:y:2020:i:55:p:792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_2931.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aleksandr Ključnikov & Ladislav Mura & David Sklenár, 2019. "Information security management in SMEs: factors of success," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(4), pages 2081-2094, June.
    2. Arun Sukumar & David Edgar & Kevin Grant, 2011. "An investigation of e-business risks in UK SMEs," World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(4), pages 380-401.
    3. Brian W. Nocco & René M. Stulz, 2006. "Enterprise Risk Management: Theory and Practice," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 18(4), pages 8-20, September.
    4. Florio, Cristina & Leoni, Giulia, 2017. "Enterprise risk management and firm performance: The Italian case," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 56-74.
    5. Chaminda Wijethilake & Tek Lama, 2019. "Sustainability core values and sustainability risk management: Moderating effects of top management commitment and stakeholder pressure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 143-154, January.
    6. Marina Nikolova & Marusya Linkova, 2011. "Risk Diversification in the Agricultural Sector in Bulgaria," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(29), pages 305-320, February.
    7. Jaroslav Belas & Martin Cepel & Anna Kotaskova, 2018. "Quality of business environment in the SME segment," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 6509331, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aleksandr Kljuènikov & Mehmet Civelek & Cyril Klimeš & Radim Farana, 2022. "Export risk perceptions of SMEs in selected Visegrad countries," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 17(1), pages 173-190, March.
    2. Emilia Jercan & Teodora Nacu, 2024. "The Role of Management/Manager Practices in the Process of Internationalization of SMEs," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 112-127.
    3. Satı, Zümrüt Ecevit, 2024. "Comparison of the criteria affecting the digital innovation performance of the European Union (EU) member and candidate countries with the entropy weight-TOPSIS method and investigation of its importa," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. Dilawar Khan & Muhammad Nouman & József Popp & Muhammad Asif Khan & Faheem Ur Rehman & Judit Oláh, 2021. "Link between Technically Derived Energy Efficiency and Ecological Footprint: Empirical Evidence from the ASEAN Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-16, June.
    5. Hermes Castro Fajardo & Lina María Otálora Gómez & Fernando Chavarro Miranda, 2022. "Análisis y evaluación de mercados internacionales de la miel natural," Apuntes del Cenes, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, vol. 41(74), pages 201-240, July.
    6. Faheem Ur Rehman & Ejaz Ahmad & Muhammad Asif Khan & József Popp & Judit Oláh, 2021. "Does Trade Related Sectoral Infrastructure Make Chinese Exports More Sophisticated and Diversified?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Müzeyyen Çiğdem Akbaş, 2024. "Measuring the impact of enterprise risk management on performance, value, and risk indicators of Borsa Istanbul XBANK companies with data mining prediction models," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. José Ruiz-Canela López, 2021. "How Can Enterprise Risk Management Help in Evaluating the Operational Risks for a Telecommunications Company?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, March.
    3. Sara Faedfar & Mustafa Özyeşil & Mustafa Çıkrıkçı & Esin Benhür Aktürk, 2022. "Effective Risk Management and Sustainable Corporate Performance Integrating Innovation and Intellectual Capital: An Application on Istanbul Exchange Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Rami Shaheen & Mehmet Ağa & Husam Rjoub & Ahmad Abualrub, 2020. "Investigation of the Pillars of Sustainability Risk Management as an Extension of Enterprise Risk Management on Palestinian Insurance Firms’ Profitability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Grazia Dicuonzo & Graziana Galeone & Erika Zappimbulso & Vittorio Dell'Atti, 2019. "Risk Management 4.0: The Role of Big Data Analytics in the Bank Sector," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(6), pages 40-47.
    6. Jia, Jing & Bradbury, Michael E., 2020. "Complying with best practice risk management committee guidance and performance," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    7. Ivana Dvorski Lacković & Nataša Kurnoga & Danijela Miloš Sprčić, 2022. "Three-factor model of Enterprise Risk Management implementation: exploratory study of non-financial companies," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(2), pages 101-122, June.
    8. Munther Al-Nimer & Sinan S. Abbadi & Ahmad Al-Omush & Habib Ahmad, 2021. "Risk Management Practices and Firm Performance with a Mediating Role of Business Model Innovation. Observations from Jordan," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, March.
    9. Malik, Muhammad Farhan & Zaman, Mahbub & Buckby, Sherrena, 2020. "Enterprise risk management and firm performance: Role of the risk committee," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    10. Naciye Sekerci & Don Pagach, 2020. "Firm Ownership and Enterprise Risk Management Implementation: Evidence from the Nordic Region," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, September.
    11. Chiara Mio & Marco Fasan & Carlo Marcon & Silvia Panfilo, 2022. "Exploring Corporate Crisis Communication after COVID-19: The Role of Enterprise Risk Management in (Re)Building Trust," Working Papers 05, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    12. Ena Pecina & Danijela Miloš Sprčić & Ivana Dvorski Lacković, 2022. "Qualitative Analysis of Enterprise Risk Management Systems in the Largest European Electric Power Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    13. Ivy Hawah Taana & Valliappan Raju, 2020. "Preliminary Investigations into the Factors Affecting Successful Implementation of Project Management Frameworks and its Effects on Project Success: Evidence from Ghana," International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, Professor Dr. Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, vol. 6(5), pages 247-264.
    14. Jiao Wang & Lima Zhao & Arnd Huchzermeier, 2021. "Operations‐Finance Interface in Risk Management: Research Evolution and Opportunities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 355-389, February.
    15. Mihaela Brindusa Tudose & Valentina Diana Rusu, 2018. "Analysis Of The Effects Of Financing And Risk Management On The Value Of Firms Listed On The Bucharest Stock Exchange," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 44-58, April.
    16. Michael Maingot & Tony Quon & Daniel Zéghal, 2018. "Risk management by US and Canadian financial firms during the financial crisis," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 15(4), pages 221-234, November.
    17. Andrei-Lauren?iu MITROFAN & Elena-Veronica CRUCERU & Andreea BARBU, 2020. "Determining The Main Causes That Lead To Cybersecurity Risks In Smes," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(4), pages 38-48, December.
    18. Sylvester Senyo Horvey & Jones Odei-Mensah, 2024. "Enterprise risk management and performance of the South African insurers: the moderating role of corporate governance," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 1-28, December.
    19. Manuela Gomez‐Valencia & Maria Alejandra Gonzalez‐Perez & Ana Maria Gomez‐Trujillo, 2021. "The “Six Ws” of sustainable development risks," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3131-3144, November.
    20. Christopher D. Ittner & Jeremy Michels, 2017. "Risk-based forecasting and planning and management earnings forecasts," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1005-1047, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    risk manager; V4 (Czech Republic; Hungary Slovakia; Poland); enterprise; risk management; ERM; sustainability;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • M16 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - International Business Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:22:y:2020:i:55:p:792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.