IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v21y2019i52p520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Responsibility of Firms and the Impact of Bio-Economy in Intelligent Use of Renewable Energy Source

Author

Listed:
  • Mihai Andronie

    (Spiru Haret University, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Violeta-Elena Simion

    (Spiru Haret University, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Elena Gurgu

    (Spiru Haret University, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Adrian Dijmãrescu

    (University of Medicine and Pharmacy ”Carol Davila” Bucharest, Romania)

  • Irina Dijmãrescu

    (Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children ”Grigore Alexandrescu” Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Through its whole set of activities related to the invention, development, production and use of biological products and processes, bio-economy contributes significantly to the economy and to the progress of society by improving the sustainability of health, nutrition, energy efficiency, industry, environmental protection and human well-being in general. In this study, by creating an overview of the efficiency of renewable energy sources, in the context of sustainable resource management for preserving a healthy, diverse and resilient ecosystem, the research aimed to show the unused renewable energy sources at maximum potential in Romania, what are the reasons for their non-use, what are the opportunities and what are the solutions that can be adopted for the exploitation of these types of renewable energy sources in Romania. In the European Union, geothermal energy has already been well exploited and, in the future, will no longer make a significant contribution to increasing the productivity of renewable energies. Eurostat data was collected and processed using a linear regression model on the primary production of renewable energy in Romania and the rest of the European states for a period of 11 years (2005-2016); at the same time, statistical forecasts were made for the years 2017 and 2018 and was pursued to what extent social responsibility activities of companies is in line with the principles of bio-economy. In Romania, there is a very high potential for both geothermal energy that is insufficiently exploited to date and for the transformation of municipal waste into energy. It also explores the possibility of using intelligent information systems to optimize the exploitation of renewable energy sources. An important role in this effort is made by companies that, by adopting a Social Responsibility Code (CRS), can bring not only benefits, but also create a positive image with favorable consequences for all parties involved.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihai Andronie & Violeta-Elena Simion & Elena Gurgu & Adrian Dijmãrescu & Irina Dijmãrescu, 2019. "Social Responsibility of Firms and the Impact of Bio-Economy in Intelligent Use of Renewable Energy Source," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(52), pages 520-520, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:21:y:2019:i:52:p:520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_2837.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Hopkins, 2005. "Measurement of corporate social responsibility," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(3/4), pages 213-231.
    2. Tamara Eugenia Baleanu & Liviu Chelcea & Alin Stancu, 2011. "The Social Responsibility of the Top 100 Romanian Companies. An Analysis of Corporate Websites," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(29), pages 235-248, February.
    3. Manuela EPURE & Rocsana BUCEA-MANEA-TONIS, 2017. "Branding and Leadership in the context of Circular Economy," International Conference on Economic Sciences and Business Administration, Spiru Haret University, vol. 4(1), pages 163-172, November.
    4. Morato, Teresa & Vaezi, Mahdi & Kumar, Amit, 2019. "Assessment of energy production potential from agricultural residues in Bolivia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 14-23.
    5. Patrick Lloyd-Smith & Henry An, 2019. "Are corporate social responsibility and advertising complements or substitutes in producing firm reputation?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(21), pages 2275-2288, May.
    6. Gheorghe Săvoiu & Constantin Manea & Victor Iorga – Simăn & Florentina Magda Enescu & Mladen Čudanov, 2011. "A Corporate Model of Similitude for SMEs Reunion into a Corporation, Viewed from the Angle of Physical Thought, and Its Complex Economic and Social Impact," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(29), pages 10-27, February.
    7. SURUGIU, Camelia & SURUGIU, Marius & MAZILESCU, Raluca & MARGINEAN, Ileana & CRISTEA, Anca, 2018. "Households’ Perception Of Climate Change Effects In Rural Romania," Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series, Universitatea Spiru Haret, vol. 18(3), pages 43-57.
    8. Vasile Dinu, 2011. "Corporate Social Responsibility – Opportunity for Reconciliation between Economical Interests and Social and Environmental Interests," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(29), pages 6-7, February.
    9. Freitas, F.F. & De Souza, S.S. & Ferreira, L.R.A. & Otto, R.B. & Alessio, F.J. & De Souza, S.N.M. & Venturini, O.J. & Ando Junior, O.H., 2019. "The Brazilian market of distributed biogas generation: Overview, technological development and case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 146-157.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vítor Domingues Martinho & Paulo Reis Mourão, 2020. "Circular Economy and Economic Development in the European Union: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Nathalie Gröfke & Valérie Duplat & Christopher Wickert & Brian Tjemkes, 2021. "A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective on Food Labelling for Environmental Sustainability: Attitudes, Perceived Barriers, and Solution Approaches towards the “Traffic Light Index”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Le Thanh Tiep & Ngo Quang Huan & Tran Thi Thuy Hong, 2021. "Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Sustainable Energy Development in Emerging Economy," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(2), pages 172-186.
    4. Sanz-Hernández, Alexia & Jiménez-Caballero, Paula & Zarauz, Irene, 2022. "Gender and women in scientific literature on bioeconomy: A systematic review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. Wadim Strielkowski & Elena Tarkhanova & Natalia Baburina & Justas Streimikis, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Renewable Energy Development in the Baltic States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Venugopal Prabhakar Gantasala & Swapna Bhargavi Gantasala & Trinh La, 2022. "Influence of motivation on achieving energy sustainability: mediating effects of decision-making," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 626-636, December.
    7. Abbas, Shahbaz & Rao, Abdur Rehman Bin Nasir & Khattak, Farrukh & Ahmad, Yasir, 2024. "Revolutionising sustainability using a new triplet: A system dynamic model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 492(C).
    8. Elena-ClaudiaSerban & Anca-Maria Hristea & ?tefania-Cristina Curea & Raluca-Florentina Cretu, 2020. "Sustainable Universities, from Indifference to Joint Action – A Panel Data Analysis," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(54), pages 376-376, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farfan, Javier & Lohrmann, Alena & Breyer, Christian, 2019. "Integration of greenhouse agriculture to the energy infrastructure as an alimentary solution," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 368-377.
    2. Omojola Awogbemi & Daramy Vandi Von Kallon & Emmanuel Idoko Onuh & Victor Sunday Aigbodion, 2021. "An Overview of the Classification, Production and Utilization of Biofuels for Internal Combustion Engine Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-43, September.
    3. Maria LOGHIN & Răzvan Cătălin DOBREA & Octavian Mihai PERPELEA, 2022. "SWOT Analysis and Key Actors in the Field of CSR," Management and Economics Review, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(2), pages 246-257, June.
    4. Lahouel, Béchir Ben & Zaied, Younes Ben & Song, Yaoyao & Yang, Guo-liang, 2021. "Corporate social performance and financial performance relationship: A data envelopment analysis approach without explicit input," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    5. Gallear, David & Ghobadian, Abby & Chen, Weifeng, 2012. "Corporate responsibility, supply chain partnership and performance: An empirical examination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 83-91.
    6. Dorel Mihai Paraschiv & Estera Laura Nemoianu & Claudia Adriana Langă & Tünde Szabó, 2012. "Eco-innovation, Responsible Leadership and Organizational Change for Corporate Sustainability," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(32), pages 404-419, June.
    7. Grazyna Smigielska & Anna Dabrowska & Malgorzata Radziukiewicz, 2015. "Fair Trade in Sustainable Development. The Potential for Fair Trade Market Growth in Poland," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(Special 9), pages 1244-1244, November.
    8. Famoso, F. & Prestipino, M. & Brusca, S. & Galvagno, A., 2020. "Designing sustainable bioenergy from residual biomass: Site allocation criteria and energy/exergy performance indicators," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    9. Halkos, George & Nomikos, Stylianos, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility: Trends in global reporting initiative standards," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 106-117.
    10. Jamilah Ahmad & Imran Ali & Georgiana Florentina Grigore & Alin Stancu, 2012. "Studying Consumers’ Ecological Consciousness – A Comparative Analysis of Romania, Malaysia and Pakistan," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(31), pages 84-98, February.
    11. Grażyna Śmigielska & Renata Oczkowska, 2017. "Retailers’ Responsibility towards Consumers and Key Drivers of Their Development in Poland," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-15, January.
    12. Borges, Cosme P. & Sobczak, Jéssica C. & Silberg, Timothy R. & Uriona-Maldonado, Mauricio & Vaz, Caroline R., 2021. "A systems modeling approach to estimate biogas potential from biomass sources in Brazil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    13. Maria Radu, 2012. "Empirical Study on the Indicators of Sustainable Performance – the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard, Effect of Strategic Organizational Change," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(32), pages 451-469, June.
    14. Chaves, Gustavo T. & Teles, Felipe & Balbo, Antonio R. & dos Reis, Célia A. & Florentino, Helenice de Oliveira, 2024. "Mathematical modelling of biodigestion in an Indian biodigester and its stability analysis via Lyapunov technique," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    15. Pina, Eduardo A. & Lozano, Miguel A. & Serra, Luis M., 2021. "Assessing the influence of legal constraints on the integration of renewable energy technologies in polygeneration systems for buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    16. Yue Qi, 2018. "On outperforming social-screening-indexing by multiple-objective portfolio selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 493-513, August.
    17. Madalina Dumitru & Raluca Gina Guse & Liliana Feleaga & Dragos Marian Mangiuc, 2015. "Marketing Communications of Value Creation in Sustainable Organizations. The Practice of Integrated Reports," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(40), pages 955-955, August.
    18. Manish Bansal, 2022. "Impact of mandatory CSR spending on strategic brand‐building levers: Evidence from a quasi‐natural experiment in India," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3620-3633, December.
    19. Georgieva, Daniela & Georgieva, Teodora, 2020. "A study of social policies based on the example of the Bulgarian hotels on the Black Sea coast," MPRA Paper 105291, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2020.
    20. Metaxas, Theodore & Tsavdaridou, Maria, 2014. "Environmental policy and CSR: How climate change is interpreted in CSR reports of Greek companies," MPRA Paper 55027, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social responsibility; bio-economy; natural resources; sustainability; intelligent use of resources;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C2 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables
    • M30 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - General
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:21:y:2019:i:52:p:520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.