IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v20y2018i49p754.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Bioeconomics to Bioeconopysis in the Context of (Bio)Diversity and Modern Morality

Author

Listed:
  • Yuichi Tei

    (University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan)

  • Gheorghe Savoiu

    (Univerity of Pitesti, Pitesti, Romania)

Abstract

The article develops a complex interdisciplinary paradigm, or rather a multiparadigm of bioeconomics, exemplifying the necessary role and the broader horizon of multidisciplinarity through bioeconophysics, in the context of (bio)diversity and modern morality, in a logically investigative and coherently summarized approach. A brief conceptual introduction is followed by the first section, dedicated to identifying the actual approach, going from scientific unidisciplinarity to modern multidisciplinarity, selecting and validating, out of the three hypotheses of plausible paths towards bioeconomics (BioEconoPhysics), Biophysical Economics or EconoBioPhysics, the one appropriately supported by arguments and historically motivated, but also because of the clarity of the methods and the consistency of the specific models. A second important section of the paper outlines the current context of (bio)diversity and morality, which is specific to bioeconomics, biophysics or econophysics, as well as the result of their interstitial or multidisciplinary unification, proving the usefulness of some detailed characteristic modern tendencies, relating to the opinions of, and relationships of science with ethics. Some final remarks and perspectives of econobiophysics or bioeconomics symmetrically close the outline of the article.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuichi Tei & Gheorghe Savoiu, 2018. "From Bioeconomics to Bioeconopysis in the Context of (Bio)Diversity and Modern Morality," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 754-754, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:20:y:2018:i:49:p:754
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_2754.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel O. Idowu & Catalina Sitnikov & Dalia Simion & Claudiu George Bocean (ed.), 2018. "Current Issues in Corporate Social Responsibility," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, Springer, number 978-3-319-70449-4.
    2. A. L. Macfie, 1959. "Adam Smith'S Moral Sentiments As Foundation For His Wealth Of Nations," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(3), pages 209-228.
    3. Gail Whiteman & Brian Walker & Paolo Perego, 2013. "Planetary Boundaries: Ecological Foundations for Corporate Sustainability," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 307-336, March.
    4. Kes McCormick & Niina Kautto, 2013. "The Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(6), pages 1-20, June.
    5. Dan-Cristian Dabija & Cătălin Postelnicu & Vasile Dinu, 2018. "Cross-Generational Investigation of Ethics and Sustainability. Insights from Romanian Retailing," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Samuel O. Idowu & Catalina Sitnikov & Dalia Simion & Claudiu George Bocean (ed.), Current Issues in Corporate Social Responsibility, pages 141-163, Springer.
    6. David Wilson & John Gowdy, 2015. "Human ultrasociality and the invisible hand: foundational developments in evolutionary science alter a foundational concept in economics," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 37-52, April.
    7. Gheorghe Savoiu & Dinu Vasile & Laurentiu Tachiciu, 2014. "An Inter-, Trans-, Cross- and Multidisciplinary Approach to Higher Education in the Field of Business Studies," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(37), pages 707-707, August.
    8. Mansour Mohammadian, 2006. "Bioeconomic Ethics: A New Morality for the Socioeconomic Enterprise in the Third Millennium," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 17(4), pages 379-399, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuliia Maksymiv & Valentyna Yakubiv & Nadia Pylypiv & Iryna Hryhoruk & Iryna Piatnychuk & Nazariy Popadynets, 2021. "Strategic Challenges for Sustainable Governance of the Bioeconomy: Preventing Conflict between SDGs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-12, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:aud:audfin:v:20:y:2018:i:49:p:754 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Daniel Adrian Gardan & Ionel Dumitru & Iuliana Petronela Gardan & Irina Elena Andronie & Cristian Uta & Mihai Andronie, 2019. "Integrating the Principles of Green Marketing by Using Big Data. Good Practices," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 258-258, February.
    3. repec:aud:audfin:v:21:y:2019:i:50:p:258 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Gabriel Brătucu & Adrian Trifan & Lavinia Dovleac & Ioana Bianca Chițu & Raluca Dania Todor & Rareș Brătucu, 2019. "Acquisition of Electric Vehicles—A Step towards Green Consumption. Empirical Research among Romanian Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Michal Patak & Lenka Branska & Zuzana Pecinova, 2021. "Consumer Intention to Purchase Green Consumer Chemicals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Peter Konhäusner & Bing Shang & Dan-Cristian Dabija, 2021. "Application of the 4Es in Online Crowdfunding Platforms: A Comparative Perspective of Germany and China," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, January.
    7. David Coen & Kyle Herman & Tom Pegram, 2022. "Are corporate climate efforts genuine? An empirical analysis of the climate ‘talk–walk’ hypothesis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3040-3059, November.
    8. Natalie Slawinski & Jonatan Pinkse & Timo Busch & Subhabrata Bobby Banerjeed, 2014. "The role of short-termism and uncertainty in organizational inaction on climate change: multilevel framework," Working Papers hal-00961226, HAL.
    9. Daniela Pasnicu & Mihaela Ghenta & Aniela Matei, 2019. "Transition to Bioeconomy: Perceptions and Behaviors in Central and Eastern Europe," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 1-9, February.
    10. Merriam Haffar & Cory Searcy, 2018. "Target‐setting for ecological resilience: Are companies setting environmental sustainability targets in line with planetary thresholds?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 1079-1092, November.
    11. Tobias Hahn & Jonatan Pinkse & Lutz Preuss & Frank Figge, 2015. "Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: Towards an Integrative Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 297-316, March.
    12. Halonen, Maija & Näyhä, Annukka & Kuhmonen, Irene, 2022. "Regional sustainability transition through forest-based bioeconomy? Development actors' perspectives on related policies, power, and justice," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    13. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2018. "Sustainability Balanced Scorecards and their Architectures: Irrelevant or Misunderstood?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 937-952, July.
    14. Blair Fix, 2022. "Economic development and the death of the free market," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 1-46, April.
    15. Simone Carmine & Valentina De Marchi, 2023. "Reviewing Paradox Theory in Corporate Sustainability Toward a Systems Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 139-158, April.
    16. Enes Ünal & Vikash Kumar Sinha, 2023. "Sustainability trade‐offs in the circular economy: A maturity‐based framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4662-4682, November.
    17. Machado, P.G. & Cunha, M. & Walter, A. & Faaij, A. & Guilhoto, J.J.M., 2021. "Biobased economy for Brazil: Impacts and strategies for maximizing socioeconomic benefits," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    18. Roland Clift & Sarah Sim & Henry King & Jonathan L. Chenoweth & Ian Christie & Julie Clavreul & Carina Mueller & Leo Posthuma & Anne-Marie Boulay & Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer & Julia Chatterton & Fabrice , 2017. "The Challenges of Applying Planetary Boundaries as a Basis for Strategic Decision-Making in Companies with Global Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-23, February.
    19. Juha Peltomaa, 2018. "Drumming the Barrels of Hope? Bioeconomy Narratives in the Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Miska, Christof & Szőcs, Ilona & Schiffinger, Michael, 2018. "Culture’s effects on corporate sustainability practices: A multi-domain and multi-level view," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 263-279.
    21. Tina C. Ambos & Katherine Tatarinov, 2022. "Building Responsible Innovation in International Organizations through Intrapreneurship," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 92-125, January.
    22. Emmanuel Josserand & Sarah Kaine & Natalia Nikolova, 2018. "Delivering sustainability in supply networks: Achieving networked multi‐stakeholder collaborations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5), pages 605-611, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    bioeconomics; bioeconomy; biophysics; econophysics; bioeconophysics; economic biophysics; econobiophysics; economics; thermodynamics; (bio)diversity; morality; inter- and multidisciplinarity.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • B29 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Other
    • N01 - Economic History - - General - - - Development of the Discipline: Historiographical; Sources and Methods
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions
    • Y80 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Related Disciplines - - - Related Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:20:y:2018:i:49:p:754. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.