IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adx/journl/v3y2021i3p152-157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender and Urban Informal Sector Employment: An Analysis from Southern Punjab, Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Durdana Qaiser Gillani
  • Hassan Shakeel Shah
  • Hafiza Nadia Bashir

Abstract

The decision to work in the labor market commonly depends on a decision by the participants between two options: to work or not to work. However, the priorities are different. Some females prefer to involve themselves in some economic activities (paid work) at home and some market activities. This research investigates the factors that motivate males and females to engage in informal employment. The data has been used collected from a household survey. This survey is made from three divisions of Southern Punjab, where the majority of the population resides. The survey is premeditated to gather some information of the households regarding demographic, social, and economic factors. The present study investigates the factors of employment by using the logit model. Findings show that low educated, married and aged people are working in the informal sector. Formally trained workers and workers of highly educated parents are switching to the formal sector. Those having assets are working in the informal sector. Those female participants having adults are participating in the informal sector. Based on study results, it is suggested that government must provide more employment opportunities in urban areas of Southern Punjab.

Suggested Citation

  • Durdana Qaiser Gillani & Hassan Shakeel Shah & Hafiza Nadia Bashir, 2021. "Gender and Urban Informal Sector Employment: An Analysis from Southern Punjab, Pakistan," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 3(3), pages 152-157.
    • Handle: RePEc:adx:journl:v:3:y:2021:i:3:p:152-157
    DOI: 10.52223/jei3032104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.52223/jei3032104
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.52223/jei3032104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Funkhouser, Edward, 1996. "The urban informal sector in Central America: Household survey evidence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(11), pages 1737-1751, November.
    2. Roberts, Kenneth D., 2001. "The determinants of job choice by rural labor migrants in Shanghai," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 15-39.
    3. Heckman, James, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    4. Angel-Urdinola, Diego F. & Tanabe, Kimie, 2012. "Micro-determinants of informal employment in the Middle East and North Africa region," Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes 66594, The World Bank.
    5. Julie H. Gallaway & Alexandra Bernasek, 2002. "Gender and Informal Sector Employment in Indonesia," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 313-321, June.
    6. Nguyen Vinh Khuong & Malik Shahzad Shabbir & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Thai Hong Thuy Khanh, 2021. "Does informal economy impede economic growth? Evidence from an emerging economy," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 103-122, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaehee Hwang, 2022. "Who Becomes a Fisherman? A Two-Stage Sample Selection Analysis on Small-Scale Fishery Choice and Income in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Uma Radhakrishnan, 2010. "A Dynamic Structural Model of Contraceptive Use and Employment Sector Choice for Women in Indonesia," Working Papers 10-28, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    3. Yanhua Wu & Lingyun Tong & Yingying Yi, 2024. "Does Having More Children Affect Women’s Informal Employment Choices? Evidence from China," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 562-578, September.
    4. Darima Fotheringham & Michael A. Wiles, 2023. "The effect of implementing chatbot customer service on stock returns: an event study analysis," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 802-822, July.
    5. Robert B. Ekelund & John D. Jackson & Robert D. Tollison, 2013. "Are Art Auction Estimates Biased?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 80(2), pages 454-465, October.
    6. Song, Wei-Ling & Uzmanoglu, Cihan, 2016. "TARP announcement, bank health, and borrowers’ credit risk," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 22-32.
    7. Xu, Shen & Yin, Bichao & Lou, Chunjie, 2022. "Minority shareholder activism and corporate social responsibility," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    8. Saziye Gazioglu & Aysit Tansel, 2006. "Job satisfaction in Britain: individual and job related factors," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(10), pages 1163-1171.
    9. Raymundo M. Campos-Vázquez, 2013. "Efectos de los ingresos no reportados en el nivel y tendencia de la pobreza laboral en México," Ensayos Revista de Economia, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Facultad de Economia, vol. 0(2), pages 23-54, November.
    10. Stephen Brown & William Goetzmann & Bing Liang & Christopher Schwarz, 2008. "Mandatory Disclosure and Operational Risk: Evidence from Hedge Fund Registration," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 63(6), pages 2785-2815, December.
    11. Fabrizio Rossi & Maretno Agus Harjoto, 2020. "Corporate non-financial disclosure, firm value, risk, and agency costs: evidence from Italian listed companies," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 1149-1181, October.
    12. Claudio A. Agostini & Marcela Perticara & Javiera Selman, 2023. "Tackling Vulnerable Households through a Working Tax Credit Scheme: A Feasible Alternative to Cash Transfers," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 245(2), pages 119-155, June.
    13. Paul W. Miller & Barry R. Chiswick, 2002. "Immigrant earnings: Language skills, linguistic concentrations and the business cycle," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 15(1), pages 31-57.
    14. Chul‐Woo Kwon & Peter F. Orazem & Daniel M. Otto, 2006. "Off‐farm labor supply responses to permanent and transitory farm income," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 34(1), pages 59-67, January.
    15. Jonathan Gruber & Aaron Yelowitz, 1999. "Public Health Insurance and Private Savings," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 107(6), pages 1249-1274, December.
    16. Castagnetti, Carolina & Rosti, Luisa, 2010. "Gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates," MPRA Paper 26685, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Jean-Louis Arcand & Linguère M'Baye, 2013. "Braving the waves: the role of time and risk preferences in illegal migration from Senegal," CERDI Working papers halshs-00855937, HAL.
    18. Chia-Ling Chao & Shwu-Min Horng, 2013. "Does the SEC's Waiver of IFRS to U.S. GAAP Reconciliation Improve the Quality of Financial Reporting?," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 2(3), pages 1-78, August.
    19. Boubakri, Narjess & Ghouma, Hatem, 2010. "Control/ownership structure, creditor rights protection, and the cost of debt financing: International evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 2481-2499, October.
    20. Emily Ouma & John Jagwe & Gideon Aiko Obare & Steffen Abele, 2010. "Determinants of smallholder farmers' participation in banana markets in Central Africa: the role of transaction costs," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(2), pages 111-122, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adx:journl:v:3:y:2021:i:3:p:152-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iqbal Javed (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.scienceimpactpub.com/journals/index.php .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.