IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abk/jajeba/ajebasp.2011.444.449.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating Individuals' Intention to be Involved in Knowledge Management Process

Author

Listed:
  • M. J.M. Razi
  • N. S.A. Karim

Abstract

Problem statement: Implementation of Knowledge Management (KM) process in organizations is considered as essential to be competitive in the present competitive world. Though the modern KM practices highly depend on technology, individuals (‘organizational members’) intention to be involved in KM process plays a major role in the success. Hence, the evaluation of individuals’ intention is deemed as significant before the actual implementation of KM process in organizations. Nevertheless, inadequate information is presented in this regard; as a result, a wide research gap prevails in the literature. In this context, the present study focuses on developing a research frame work that can be used to measure the individual intention to be involved in KM process. Approach: Subsequent to a critical analysis of the research gaps, a basic research model has been developed based on knowledge creation theory, KM enablers, and individual acceptance model. Measurers and questionnaire items were identified for each variable from relevant literature. Consequently, the reliability of the instrument was tested among academic staff of a Malaysian university. Results: The Cronbach’s alpha for each variable is more than 0.800 that exhibits the reliability of the instruments. Conclusion: The presented research framework might be a doorstep for future study in this area of KM. Moreover, practitioners may use the proposed framework to measure the intention of individuals to be involved in KM process before actually embarking to it. However, the framework and the model should be tested in different socio cultural and organizational climate to make it robust.

Suggested Citation

  • M. J.M. Razi & N. S.A. Karim, 2011. "Investigating Individuals' Intention to be Involved in Knowledge Management Process," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 3(3), pages 444-449, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:abk:jajeba:ajebasp.2011.444.449
    DOI: 10.3844/ajebasp.2011.444.449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://thescipub.com/pdf/ajebasp.2011.444.449.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://thescipub.com/abstract/ajebasp.2011.444.449
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3844/ajebasp.2011.444.449?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akbar Nabiollahi & Rose Alinda Alias & Shamsul Sahibuddin, 2011. "Involvement of Service Knowledge Management System in Integration of ITIL V3 and Enterprise Architecture," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 3(1), pages 165-170, January.
    2. Hsiu‐Fen Lin, 2007. "Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 28(3/4), pages 315-332, June.
    3. Nonaka, Ikujiro & Byosiere, Philippe & Borucki, Chester C. & Konno, Noboru, 1994. "Organizational knowledge creation theory: A first comprehensive test," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 337-351, December.
    4. Roxanne Helm Stevens & Joshua Millage & Sondra Clark, 2010. "Waves of Knowledge Management: The Flow between Explicit and Tacit Knowledge," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 2(1), pages 129-135, March.
    5. Hsiu-Fen Lin, 2007. "Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 28(1), pages 315 - 332, April.
    6. Nasrin Dastranj Mamaghani & Reza Samizadeh & Fatemeh Saghafi, 2011. "Evaluating the Readiness of Iranian Research Centers in Knowledge Management," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 3(1), pages 203-212, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ayande Alpha & Sabourin Vincent, 2011. "Strategy Execution: An Empirical Analysis of Obstacles Faced by Master of Business Administration Executive Students," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 3(3), pages 511-524, October.
    2. Laila Naif Marouf & Naresh Kumar Agarwal, 2016. "Are Faculty Members Ready? Individual Factors Affecting Knowledge Management Readiness in Universities," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 1-28, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zahid Yousaf & Mirela Panait & Umair Tanveer & Alina Cretu & Andrei Hrebenciuc & Sheikh Muhammad Zahid, 2022. "Value Creation through Frugal Innovation, Innovation Capability and Knowledge Sharing in a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Wookjoon Sung & Changil Kim, 2021. "A Study on the Effect of Change Management on Organizational Innovation: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Members’ Innovative Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    3. da Silva, Filipa Pires & Mosquera, Pilar & Soares, Maria Eduarda, 2022. "Factors influencing knowledge sharing among IT geographically dispersed teams," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Vida Škudien&# & Ieva Augutytė-Kvedaravičien&# & Ugne Gabrielaityte, 2021. "Knowledge Management and Perceived Organisational Innovativeness in Global Organisations," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2021(3), pages 51-65.
    5. Michael Twum-Darko & Lee-Anne Lesley Harker, 2017. "Understanding Knowledge Sharing in an Organization: A Perspective of Actor-Network Theory," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 53-74, January.
    6. Muhammad Binsawad & Osama Sohaib & Igor Hawryszkiewycz, 2019. "Factors Impacting Technology Business Incubator Performance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(01), pages 1-30, January.
    7. Qing’e Wang & Luwei Zhao & Alice Chang-Richards & Yuanyuan Zhang & Hujun Li, 2021. "Understanding the Impact of Social Capital on the Innovation Performance of Construction Enterprises: Based on the Mediating Effect of Knowledge Transfer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Maciej Zastempowski & Waldemar Glabiszewski & Krzysztof Krukowski & Szymon Cyfert, 2020. "Technological Innovation Capabilities of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 460-474.
    9. Kuruppuge Ravindra Hewa & Gregar Ales & Jayawardena Chandana & Kudláček Ladislav, 2018. "Demographic, Individual, Job Diversities and Knowledge Sharing: A Study of Enterprising Family Businesses," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 271-282, December.
    10. Peng Wu & Ran Feng, 2021. "Social Media and Health: Emerging Trends and Future Directions for Research on Young Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Sun, Xiuli & Li, Haizheng & Ghosal, Vivek, 2020. "Firm-level human capital and innovation: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    12. Farooq Ahmad & Md Billal Hossain & Khurram Mustafa & Faisal Ejaz & Kausar Fiaz Khawaja & Anna Dunay, 2023. "Green HRM Practices and Knowledge Sharing Improve Environmental Performance by Raising Employee Commitment to the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Aboobucker Ilmudeen, 2022. "Leveraging IT-enabled dynamic capabilities to shape business process agility and firm innovative capability: moderating role of turbulent environment," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(8), pages 2341-2379, November.
    14. Shujahat, Muhammad & Sousa, Maria José & Hussain, Saddam & Nawaz, Faisal & Wang, Minhong & Umer, Muhammad, 2019. "Translating the impact of knowledge management processes into knowledge-based innovation: The neglected and mediating role of knowledge-worker productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 442-450.
    15. Hoa Trong Hoang & Dung The Pham & Duc Dinh Nguyen, 2018. "Innovation practices at Vietnamese manufacturers: the impacts of innovation on profitability and growth," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(3), pages 1457-1466.
    16. Eugenie Byukusenge & John C. Munene, 2017. "Knowledge management and business performance: Does innovation matter?," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1368434-136, January.
    17. Haruthai Chenboonthai & Tsunemi Watanabe, 2019. "Cooperation Intensity for Effective Policy Development and Implementation: A Case Study of Thailand’s Alternative Energy Development Plan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-23, June.
    18. Salih Yesil & Zumrut Hatice Sekkeli & Ozkan Dogan, 2012. "An Investigation into the Implications of Islamic Work Ethic (IWE) in the Workplace," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 4(11), pages 612-624.
    19. Kathryn Cormican & Chen Meng & Suzana Sampaio & Qiong Wu, 2021. "Towards Sustainable Knowledge Sharing Practices: An Analysis of Organizational Level Enablers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Gupta, Shivam & Busso, Donatella & Kamboj, Shampy, 2021. "Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 788-798.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abk:jajeba:ajebasp.2011.444.449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jeffery Daniels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://thescipub.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.