IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v23y2019i51360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interorganizational Relationships in the Amazon Biotech Industry Based on Entrepreneurs´ Perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Rosana Zau Mafra
  • Dimas José Lasmar
  • Dalton Chaves Vilela Júnior

Abstract

The process of industrial restructuring has adopted different types of relationships in order to guarantee the organizations survival and development. Bioindustry requires high technical-scientific investments that are obtained through partnerships. These collaborative relationships, however, have been challenging in Brazil. In the Amazon context, where value adding in the use of biodiversity resources bears high importance for regional sustainable development, studies point to difficulties of interaction between bioindustry firms, university, and government. Against this backdrop, this research analyzes the perception of entrepreneurs operating in the Amazon bioindustry regarding the inter-organizational relationships. Qualitative research was carried out with thirteen firms, collecting data based on network pictures, complemented with semi-structured interviews. The study identified that attributes such as friendship and trust are primary factors in the relationships, and that the complementarity of resources is the main reason to establish partnerships. However, the findings suggest that inter and intra-sectorial relationships in this Amazon bioindustry are far behind what is recommended in literature to affirm the existence of a business network. Therefore, the study points out the need for strategic actions to approximate these actors in bioindustry.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosana Zau Mafra & Dimas José Lasmar & Dalton Chaves Vilela Júnior, 2019. "Interorganizational Relationships in the Amazon Biotech Industry Based on Entrepreneurs´ Perceptions," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 23(5), pages 672-695.
    • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:23:y:2019:i:5:1360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1360/1407
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/1360/1407
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valtteri Kaartemo & Hannu Makkonen & Rami Olkkonen, 2015. "The potential of network pictures for international alliance and network research," Chapters, in: Handbook on International Alliance and Network Research, chapter 9, pages 229-242, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Viaggi, Davide, 2018. "Towards an economics of the bioeconomy: four years later," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 5(2), September.
    3. Kamuriwo, Dzidziso Samuel & Baden-Fuller, Charles, 2016. "Knowledge integration using product R&D outsourcing in biotechnology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 1031-1045.
    4. Wilkinson, Ian & Young, Louise, 2002. "On cooperating: firms, relations and networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 123-132, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karl Finger & Daniel Fricke & Thomas Lux, 2013. "Network analysis of the e-MID overnight money market: the informational value of different aggregation levels for intrinsic dynamic processes," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 187-211, June.
    2. Carolina Rojas-Córdova & Amanda J. Williamson & Julio A. Pertuze & Gustavo Calvo, 2023. "Why one strategy does not fit all: a systematic review on exploration–exploitation in different organizational archetypes," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(7), pages 2251-2295, October.
    3. Jarratt, Denise & Ceric, Arnela, 2015. "The complexity of trust in business collaborations," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 2-12.
    4. Stefan Bößner & Francis X. Johnson & Zoha Shawoo, 2020. "Governing the Bioeconomy: What Role for International Institutions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    5. Mattos, Enlinson & Bressan, Rafael, 2022. "Nontariff barriers, trading companies and customs duties evasion," Textos para discussão 560, FGV EESP - Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil).
    6. Thakur-Wernz, Pooja & Bruyaka, Olga & Contractor, Farok, 2020. "Antecedents and relative performance of sourcing choices for new product development projects," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 90.
    7. Filipe J. Sousa & Luís M. de Castro, 2005. "Relationship significance: is it sufficiently explained?," FEP Working Papers 183, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    8. Anselm Schneider & Christopher Wickert & Emilio Marti, 2017. "Reducing Complexity by Creating Complexity: A Systems Theory Perspective on How Organizations Respond to Their Environments," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 182-208, March.
    9. Yee, C.L. & Platts, K.W., 2006. "A framework and tool for supply network strategy operationalisation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 230-248, November.
    10. Wang, Ming-Chao & Chen, Pei-Chen & Fang, Shih-Chieh, 2018. "A critical view of knowledge networks and innovation performance: The mediation role of firms' knowledge integration capability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 222-233.
    11. Stefania Bracco & Ozgul Calicioglu & Marta Gomez San Juan & Alessandro Flammini, 2018. "Assessing the Contribution of Bioeconomy to the Total Economy: A Review of National Frameworks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    12. Weltin, M. & Zasada, I., 2018. "Adopting and Combining Strategies of Sustainable Intensification An Analysis of Interdependencies in Farmers Decision Making," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 276982, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Anna Borawska & Malgorzata Latuszynska, 2020. "Incorporating Neuroscience Data into Agent-Based Simulation Models of Buyer Behavior," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1197-1212.
    14. Cerqueti, Roy & Clemente, Gian Paolo & Grassi, Rosanna, 2021. "Stratified cohesiveness in complex business networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 515-526.
    15. Olena Gudz & Nataliya Prokopenko, 2018. "The Increase Of Enterprises' Innovative Development Based On The Network Approach," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(1).
    16. Simba, Amon & Wang, Yan & del Olmo García, Francisco, 2023. "Deconstructing self-organisation in microentrepreneurship: A social embeddedness perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    17. Figueiredo, Paulo N. & Larsen, Henrik & Hansen, Ulrich E., 2020. "The role of interactive learning in innovation capability building in multinational subsidiaries: A micro-level study of biotechnology in Brazil," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(6).
    18. Nell, Phillip C. & Andersson, Ulf, 2012. "The complexity of the business network context and its effect on subsidiary relational (over-) embeddedness," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 1087-1098.
    19. Chou, Hsin-Hui & Zolkiewski, Judy, 2012. "Managing resource interaction as a means to cope with technological change," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 188-195.
    20. Felix Kipkosgei & Seung-Wan Kang & Suk Bong Choi, 2020. "A Team-Level Study of the Relationship between Knowledge Sharing and Trust in Kenya: Moderating Role of Collaborative Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:23:y:2019:i:5:1360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.