IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abd/kauiea/v33y2020i1no7p91-98.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethics of Big Data: A Socio-Economic Perspective أخلاقيات البيانات الضخمة: منظور اجتماعي-اقتصادي

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed Abdullah Omar Nasseef

    (Assistant Professor, Islamic Economics Institute, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

With the development of information technology, artificial intelligence, and robots, capitalism has increasingly assumed a form of platform capitalism which is ‘reconceptualizing our economy’ to the extent that it is ‘forcing us to rethink economics’. Capitalism and various institutions controlled by this system have been the subject of criticism in the past and need was expressed to reform them. But today it has become most obvious that there is need for ‘replacing it with a more caring and provisioning sustainable system’. The steps taken by the 28 European Union countries regarding General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) are commendable. It is recommended that Muslim countries should adopt similar regulations for the protection of the data of their citizens as it is in full conformity with the Quranic teaching of privacy preservation. مع التطور المتسارع لتكنولوجيا المعلومات والعلوم الخاصة بالذكاء الاصطناعي، سعت الرأسمالية على دعم منصات جمع البيانات بغرض الاستفادة المادية المجردة من أي اعتبارات إنسانية، وكذلك الضغط نحو إعادة التفكير في علم الاقتصاد نفسه من خلال سيطرة هذه المنصات على بيانات المتعاملين وبالتالي على مفاصل الاقتصاد. إن الرأسمالية والعديد من المؤسسات مسيطر عليها من قبل "نظام" يتحكم في مفاصل الاقتصاد العالمي، فحاليا هناك حاجة أكثر إلحاحا من ذي قبل نحو التغيير و المطالبة باستبدال النظام الرأسمالي الحالي بنظام آخر أكثر إيجابية واهتماما واستدامة. إن الخطوة الإيجابية التي أقدمت عليها 28 دولة من دول الاتحاد الأوروبي، الخاصة بتفعيل نظام حماية البيانات العامة GDPR للأفراد داخل الاتحاد الأوروبي، والذي يمنع تداول البيانات العامة الشخصية بين الشركات الرأسمالية الكبرى، وهو ما نتمنى على دول العالم الإسلامي فرض نظام حماية مشابه يحمي أفراد المجتمع في هذه الشركات ومن التلاعب بخصوصية بياناتها.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed Abdullah Omar Nasseef, 2020. "Ethics of Big Data: A Socio-Economic Perspective أخلاقيات البيانات الضخمة: منظور اجتماعي-اقتصادي," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 33(1), pages 91-98, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:33:y:2020:i:1:no:7:p:91-98
    DOI: 10.4197/Islec.33-1.7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iei.kau.edu.sa/Files/121/Files/153867_33-01-07-MNaseef-3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4197/Islec.33-1.7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jack Reardon, 2020. "Platform Capitalism, Big Data, and Data Ethics رأسمالية المنصات، البيانات الضخمة، وأخلاقيات البيانات," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 33(1), pages 59-69, January.
    2. Frey, Carl Benedikt & Osborne, Michael A., 2017. "The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 254-280.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alfred Benedikt Brendel & Milad Mirbabaie & Tim-Benjamin Lembcke & Lennart Hofeditz, 2021. "Ethical Management of Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Corina-Cristiana NASTACĂ & Ariana NĂSTĂSEANU & Mădălin Valentin DRĂGUȚ & Claudiu-Emanuel SIMION, 2021. "Innovation Performance in Romania and EU’s Member States - A Comparative Approach," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(5), pages 744-765, December.
    3. Černý, Martin & Bruckner, Martin & Weinzettel, Jan & Wiebe, Kirsten & Kimmich, Christian & Kerschner, Christian & Hubacek, Klaus, 2024. "Global employment and skill level requirements for ‘Post-Carbon Europe’," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    4. Ghimire, Ramesh & Skinner, Jim & Carnathan, Mike, 2020. "Who perceived automation as a threat to their jobs in metro Atlanta: Results from the 2019 Metro Atlanta Speaks survey," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    5. António B. Moniz & Bettina-Johanna Krings, 2016. "Robots Working with Humans or Humans Working with Robots? Searching for Social Dimensions in New Human-Robot Interaction in Industry," Societies, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Enflo, Kerstin & Molinder, Jakob & Karlsson, Tobias, 2019. "More Power to the People: Electricity Adoption, Technological Change and Social Conflict," CEPR Discussion Papers 13986, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Loebbing, Jonas, 2018. "An Elementary Theory of Endogenous Technical Change and Wage Inequality," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181603, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    8. Herbert Dawid & Michael Neugart, 2023. "Effects of technological change and automation on industry structure and (wage-)inequality: insights from a dynamic task-based model," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 35-63, January.
    9. Samuel Ogbeibu & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & James Gaskin & Abdelhak Senadjki & Mathew Hughes, 2021. "Leveraging STARA competencies and green creativity to boost green organisational innovative evidence: A praxis for sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2421-2440, July.
    10. Vasso Marinoudi & Maria Lampridi & Dimitrios Kateris & Simon Pearson & Claus Grøn Sørensen & Dionysis Bochtis, 2021. "The Future of Agricultural Jobs in View of Robotization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Wang, Jianlong & Wang, Weilong & Liu, Yong & Wu, Haitao, 2023. "Can industrial robots reduce carbon emissions? Based on the perspective of energy rebound effect and labor factor flow in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    12. Nicolaj S{o}ndergaard Muhlbach, 2021. "occ2vec: A principal approach to representing occupations using natural language processing," Papers 2111.02528, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    13. Benjamin Meindl & Morgan R. Frank & Joana Mendonc{c}a, 2021. "Exposure of occupations to technologies of the fourth industrial revolution," Papers 2110.13317, arXiv.org.
    14. Josten, Cecily & Lordan, Grace, 2022. "Automation and the Changing Nature of Work," IZA Discussion Papers 15180, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Maximilian Longmuir & Carsten Schröde & Matteo Targa, 2020. "De-Routinization of Jobs and Polarization of Earnings: Evidence from 35 Countries," Working Papers 1397, Economic Research Forum, revised 20 Jun 2020.
    16. Oxelheim, Lars & Randøy, Trond, 2021. "The Global Logistic Chain Under Siege in a Post-Covid Era," Working Paper Series 1404, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    17. López Noria Gabriela, 2021. "Effects of Trade and Technology on the Mexican Labor Market," Working Papers 2021-22, Banco de México.
    18. Roland Z. Szabó & Márk János Tátrai, 2020. "Digitalization, Quality of Life and Purchasing Power," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 16(02), pages 97-102.
    19. Verdin, Rachel & O'Reilly, Jacqueline, 2021. "A gender agenda for the future of work in a digital age of pandemics: Jobs, skills and contracts," WSI Studies 24, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    20. Costantini, Valeria & Sforna, Giorgia, 2020. "A dynamic CGE model for jointly accounting ageing population, automation and environmental tax reform. European Union as a case study," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 280-306.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:33:y:2020:i:1:no:7:p:91-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cikausa.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.