IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abd/kauiea/v31y2018i2no1p3-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship between Religiosity and Individual Economic Achievement: Evidence from South Kalimantan, Indonesia العلاقة بين التدين والإنجاز الاقتصادي للأفراد: أدلة من جنوب كاليمانتان، إندونيسيا

Author

Listed:
  • Selamah Abdullah Yusof

    (Department of Economics, International Islamic University Malaysia)

  • Mohammad Arif Budiman

    (Department of Accounting for Islamic Financial Institutions Banjarmasin State Polytechnic, Indonesia)

  • Ruzita Mohammad Amin

    (Department of Economics, International Islamic University Malaysia)

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of religiosity on economic development or achievement of individuals in South Kalimantan, Indonesia. This province is of interest as its people are viewed as highly religious but lagging in economic development. The study attempts to address the measurement issues found in earlier studies at the micro level of analysis by constructing a multi-dimensional measure of religiosity. This study considers five dimensions of religion, namely: ritualistic, experiential, ideological, consequential and intellectual. Apart from the construction of a multi-dimensional measure of religiosity, an indicator of economic wellbeing is formulated other than income. The results show that Muslims in South Kalimantan have a high level of religiosity and that those with higher level of religiosity are economically better-off. Education was also found to be a significant determinant of individual economic achievement. Hence, religion and education must be emphasized for economic progress especially for South Kalimantan which has a low level of education. تتناول هذه الدراسة تأثير التَّدَين على النمو أو الإنجاز الاقتصادي للأفراد في مقاطعة جنوب كاليمانتان، في إندونيسيا؛ إذ تتميز هذه المقاطعة بارتفاع نسبة تَدين الأفراد فيها، وضعف مستوى النمو الاقتصادي في آن واحد. تهدف الدراسة إلى استكمال بعض أوجه القصور في الدراسات السابقة التي تناولت هذا الموضوع على المستوى الجزئي، من خلال مقياس خماسي الأبعاد لقياس مستوى التدين يتضمن: الشعائر التعبدية، والجوانب العملية، والجوانب العقدية، والجوانب الاجتماعية، والجوانب الفكرية، علاوة على تلك الجوانب تم استخدام مؤشر للرفاه الاقتصادي غير قائم على مستوى الدخل كما هو شائع في الأدبيات الاقتصادية. أظهرت النتائج أن مستوى التدين عند المسلمين في مقاطعة جنوب كاليمانتان عالٍ، وأن الأشخاص الأكثر تديناً أفضل حالاً من الناحية الاقتصادية. كما خلص البحث إلى أن التعليم يعد مؤشراً مهماً في تحقيق الرفاه الاقتصادي للأفراد، مما يستوجب التركيز عليه وعلى التدين اللذين يعدان من أهم المؤشرات في تحقيق التقدم الاقتصادي خاصة في مقاطعة جنوب كاليمانتان ذات الطبيعة السكانية الأقل تعليماً.

Suggested Citation

  • Selamah Abdullah Yusof & Mohammad Arif Budiman & Ruzita Mohammad Amin, 2018. "Relationship between Religiosity and Individual Economic Achievement: Evidence from South Kalimantan, Indonesia العلاقة بين التدين والإنجاز الاقتصادي للأفراد: أدلة من جنوب كاليمانتان، إندونيسيا," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 31(2), pages 3-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:31:y:2018:i:2:no:1:p:3-16
    DOI: 10.4197/Islec.31-2.1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iei.kau.edu.sa/Files/121/Files/153869_31-02-01-0SalmanYusof.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4197/Islec.31-2.1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guiso, Luigi & Sapienza, Paola & Zingales, Luigi, 2003. "People's opium? Religion and economic attitudes," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 225-282, January.
    2. Dierk Herzer & Holger Strulik, 2017. "Religiosity and income: a panel cointegration and causality analysis," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(30), pages 2922-2938, June.
    3. L. Bettendorf & E. Dijkgraaf, 2008. "Religion and Income," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 08-014/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    4. Craig S. Galbraith & Devon M. Galbraith, 2007. "An empirical note on entrepreneurial activity, intrinsic religiosity and economic growth," Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(2), pages 188-201, June.
    5. L. Bettendorf & E. Dijkgraaf, 2011. "The bicausal relation between religion and income," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(11), pages 1351-1363.
    6. Noland, Marcus, 2005. "Religion and economic performance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1215-1232, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Salman Syed Ali & Hamid Hasan, 2019. "Does Religiosity Affect Multidimensional Poverty? Evidence from World Values Survey (2010-2014) هل يؤثر التدين على الفقر متعدد الأبعاد؟ أدلة من المسح العالمي للقيم (2014-2010م)," Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute., vol. 32(2), pages 3-24, January.
    2. Muhammad Zilal Hamzah & Yukichika Kawata & Syed Ahmed Salman & Eleonora Sofilda, 2022. "Peer Effects of the Same and Different Religions on Faithfulness: A Comparison between Indonesia and India," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guerzoni, Marco & Jordan, Alexander, 2016. "“Cursed is the ground because of you”: Religion, Ethnicity, and the Adoption of Fertilizers in Rural Ethiopia," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis. Working Papers 201605, University of Turin.
    2. Janine Höhener & Christoph A. Schaltegger, 2012. "Religionsökonomie: eine Übersicht," CREMA Working Paper Series 2012-08, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    3. Gil Avnimelech & Yaron Zelekha, 2023. "Religion and the gender gap in entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 629-665, June.
    4. Holger Strulik, 2016. "Secularization And Long-Run Economic Growth," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 54(1), pages 177-200, January.
    5. Marie Lechler & Uwe Sunde, 2020. "Aging, Proximity to Death, and Religiosity," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 46(4), pages 735-755, December.
    6. Abraham Gyamfi Ababio & Anthony Osei-Fosu & Emmanuel Buabeng, 2021. "Religious orientation and poverty in Ghana: associations and explanations," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 23(2), pages 377-396, December.
    7. Feng Zhang & Haina Zhang & Geoffrey G. Bell, 2021. "Corporate religiosity and individual decision on conducting entrepreneurial activity: The contingent effects of institutional environments in China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 955-978, September.
    8. Chaudhary, Latika & Rubin, Jared, 2016. "Religious identity and the provision of public goods: Evidence from the Indian Princely States," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 461-483.
    9. Ji, Yaling, 2020. "Religiosity and the adoption of formal financial services," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 378-396.
    10. Pavol Minárik, 2013. "Ekonomie náboženství a její relevance pro ekonomy ve střední Evropě [Economics of Religion and its Relevance for Economists in Central Europe]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2013(5), pages 691-704.
    11. Rehman Scheherazade S. & Askari Hossein, 2010. "An Economic IslamicityIndex (EI)," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 1-39, October.
    12. Alexander Jordan & Marco Guerzoni, 2021. "“Cursed is the ground because of you”:," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 853-890, July.
    13. Roland Bénabou & Davide Ticchi & Andrea Vindigni, 2022. "Forbidden Fruits: The Political Economy of Science, Religion, and Growth," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 89(4), pages 1785-1832.
    14. Seguino, Stephanie, 2011. "Help or Hindrance? Religion's Impact on Gender Inequality in Attitudes and Outcomes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 1308-1321, August.
    15. Platteau, Jean-Philippe, 2008. "Religion, politics, and development: Lessons from the lands of Islam," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 329-351, November.
    16. Pascal Gantenbein & Axel Kind & Christophe Volonté, 2019. "Individualism and Venture Capital: A Cross-Country Study," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 59(5), pages 741-777, October.
    17. Xunan Feng & Zhi Jin & Anders C. Johansson, 2021. "How beliefs influence behaviour: Confucianism and innovation in China," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 501-525, July.
    18. Christophe Volonté, 2015. "Culture and Corporate Governance: The Influence of Language and Religion in Switzerland," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 77-118, February.
    19. Wang, Qunyong & Lin, Xinyu, 2014. "Does religious beliefs affect economic growth? Evidence from provincial-level panel data in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 277-287.
    20. Maria Efremova & Zarina Lepshokova, 2015. "Strength and Positivity of Religious Identification as Predictors of the Attitude Toward Economic Involvement Among Orthodox Christians and Sunni Muslims in Russia," HSE Working papers WP BRP 46/PSY/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Religiosity; South Kalimantan; Economic achievement. التدين، كاليمانتان الجنوبية، الإنجاز الاقتصادي.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • Z12 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Religion

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abd:kauiea:v:31:y:2018:i:2:no:1:p:3-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: King Abdulaziz University, Islamic Economics Institute. (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cikausa.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.