IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aaz/sbir01/v2y2018i1p1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La competitividad sistémica de la MIPYME manufacturera en el nivel micro: caso de la fabricación de muebles de madera, Ecuador

Author

Listed:

Abstract

La competitividad ha sido considerada, desde la teoría económica tradicional hasta la moderna, como un elemento de diferenciación entre los países a través de sus empresas. La evolución del concepto de competitividad lo inician los economistas clásicos por el año de 1776 hasta actuales corrientes con Porter (1990) en donde se apuesta por un análisis sistémico. En el Ecuador no existen parámetros establecidos para determinar la competitividad de las empresas, existe un dinamismo comercial donde cerca del 95% está cubierto por la micro, pequeña y mediana empresa por lo que se hace necesario realizar esta investigación que tiene como objetivo la medición de la competitividad en el nivel micro del enfoque sistémico, en las empresas de fabricación de muebles de madera. Para tal fin se utilizó el mapa de competitividad del BID, adaptado por Saavedra (2014); los principales hallazgos permiten determinar que las empresas estudiadas presentan baja competitividad. Los factores en los que destaca son Gestión ambiental, Aseguramiento de la calidad, Producción y operaciones y Planeación estratégica; la relación entre los factores y la competitividad muestra evidencia de la importancia de los Recursos Humanos para impulsar la competitividad de las empresas en este sector

Suggested Citation

  • Bermeo Pazmiño, Katina Vanessa & Saavedra García, María Luisa, 2018. "La competitividad sistémica de la MIPYME manufacturera en el nivel micro: caso de la fabricación de muebles de madera, Ecuador," Small Business International Review, Asociación Española de Contabilidad y Administración de Empresas - AECA, vol. 2(1), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:aaz:sbir01:v:2:y:2018:i:1:p:1-15
    DOI: 10.26784/sbir.v2i1.20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.26784/sbir.v2i1.20
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://sbir.upct.es/index.php/sbir/article/view/20/28
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26784/sbir.v2i1.20?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ricardo,David, 2015. "On the Principles of Political Economy, and Taxation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108075435, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mann, Stefan & Besser, Tim, 2016. "Diversifikation und Arbeitszufriedenheit – trifft die These von Marx und Engels auf Landwirte zu?," 56th Annual Conference, Bonn, Germany, September 28-30, 2016 244808, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    2. Kai CHEN & Roxana STEGEREAN & Razvan Liviu NISTOR, 2018. "Value Creation And Value Added In Blockchain Technology," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(1), pages 862-878, November.
    3. Matt Ridley, 2017. "Adam Smith and the Past, Present, and Future of Liberalism," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 32(Fall 2017), pages 1-7.
    4. Yingfei Yang & Yingfei Yang & Michal Fabuš & Ki-Hyung Bae & Mengze Zhang, 2020. "A diamond model based analysis for improving the sustainable competitiveness in educational exports by Chinese colleges and universities," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(3), pages 1858-1871, March.
    5. Bahinipati, Chandra Sekhar & Sirohi, Rahul A & Rao, Sagarika S, 2022. "Technological Innovations, Behavioural Interventions, and Household Energy Conservation: Policy Insights and Lessons," Ecology, Economy and Society - the INSEE Journal, Indian Society of Ecological Economics (INSEE), vol. 5(01), January.
    6. Tadashi Ito & Yukiko Umeno Saito, 2021. "Indirect trade and direct trade: Evidence from Japanese firm transaction data," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 444-461, February.
    7. Cristina Pérez-Pérez & Diana Benito-Osorio & Susana María García-Moreno, 2021. "New Puppets in the Old School: The Applicability of Traditional Internationalisation Theories in the Sharing Economy," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, September.
    8. Charpe, Matthieu & Bridji, Slim & Mcadam, Peter, 2020. "Labor Share And Growth In The Long Run," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(7), pages 1720-1757, October.
    9. Kinda, Harouna & Thiombiano, Noel, 2021. "The effects of extractive industries rent on deforestation in developing countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    10. Manamba EPAPHRA & John MASSAWE, 2017. "The Effect of Corruption on Foreign Direct Investment: A Panel Data Study," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 19-54, March.
    11. Gennady Vasilievich Osipov & Vadim Vitalievich Ponkratov & Svetlana Gennadievna Karepova & Tatiana Bloshenko & Andrei Vorontcov, 2019. "Transit tariff optimization model for Russia and Central Asia energy cooperation," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(1), pages 398-412, September.
    12. Chatzarakis, Nikolaos & Tsaliki, Persefoni & Tsoulfidis, Lefteris, 2022. "Does the Labour Theory of Value Explain Economic Growth? A Modern Classical View," MPRA Paper 112824, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Sękowski, Stefan, 2021. "The pros and cons of rent-seeking: Political rent in various research paradigms," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Nguyen Quang Thai & Bui Trinh & Nguyen Hong Nhung, 2019. "The Discussion on Input – Output Framework Extended for Analyzing on Relationship between Demographic and Economic," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(6), pages 52-57, June.
    15. Guilherme Silva Fracarolli, 2021. "Global Markets, Local Issues: The Hegemonic Process of Agri-Food Construction to Present Challenges," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
    16. Hao Hu & Shufang Wang & Jin-liao He, 2020. "Comparative Advantages of Free Trade Port Construction in Shanghai under the Belt and Road Initiative," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, February.
    17. N. V. Ezechukwu, 2023. "Consumer Protection and Trade Governance: A Critical Partnership?," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 191-221, June.
    18. HUBERT Marie-Hélène & MOREAUX Michel, 2007. "The challenge of meeting the future food needs," LERNA Working Papers 07.17.238, LERNA, University of Toulouse.
    19. Katarzyna Łukiewska & Małgorzata Juchniewicz, 2021. "Identification of the Relationships between Competitive Potential and Competitive Position of the Food Industry in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, April.
    20. José L. Martínez González, 2019. "High Wages or Wages For Energy? An Alternative View of The British Case (1645-1700)," Working Papers 0158, European Historical Economics Society (EHES).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    MIPYME; Competitividad Sistémica; Medición;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance
    • L69 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aaz:sbir01:v:2:y:2018:i:1:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Carlos Martinez (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aecaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.