IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aan/journl/v6y2024i2p206-216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Multifund System – Is It an Option for Raising the Sustainability of The Bulgarian Pension System?

Author

Listed:
  • Jeko Milev

    (Department of Finance, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria)

  • Kremena Choutilova-Yochkolovska

    (Department of Finance, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria)

Abstract

Background: Bulgarian universal pension funds have been operating for more than 20 years. They were established into Bulgarian pension system as supplementary elements whose basic aim was to strengthen the sustainability of the system in the long term. Following the recommendations of the World Bank (1994), the policymakers in the country introduced a fully funded defined contribution pension scheme where the investment risk is almost entirely borne by the insured individuals. Hence, low returns realized by pension companies during the accumulation phase detriment seriously the amounts of the pension benefits at the date of retirement. The second pillar pension funds are allowed to structure and manage only one portfolio of assets which could hardly suit the interests of both young and old scheme members. The investment horizon is crucial when it comes to the right mixture of assets in the investment portfolio. Purpose: The purpose of the current study is to discuss some of the critical elements of multifund system as one of the tools for life cycle investing in pension insurance. The research is trying to shed some light on the important features that must be sorted out before introducing the scheme in practice. Methodology: The methodology used throughout the paper embraces mostly comparative and descriptive analysis, but also deductive and systematic approaches were applied. Findings: The basic findings of the research concern the way that must be addressed such issues as the number and structure of the managed portfolios, the distribution of those insured individuals that have not made an active choice about their preferred fund and the guaranteed mechanisms about the paid contributions. Practical Implications: The article contributes to the ongoing debate about the exact structure and design of the multifunds as a possible elaboration of the universal pension funds in Bulgaria. Originality: The research has a value for all those who work in the sphere of pension fund management and life cycle investing. By exposing the basic features and problematic elements of the multifunds, the research offers possible solutions for the establishment of a multifund system in Bulgaria. Paper type: The article is a research paper. The first part compares the basic characteristics of multifunds in several countries already with such system. The second part recommends possible options for its introduction into Bulgarian practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeko Milev & Kremena Choutilova-Yochkolovska, 2024. "The Multifund System – Is It an Option for Raising the Sustainability of The Bulgarian Pension System?," Finance, Accounting and Business Analysis, University of National and World Economy, Institute for Economics and Politics, vol. 6(2), pages 206-216, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:aan:journl:v:6:y:2024:i:2:p:206-216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.unwe.bg/doi/FABA/2024.2/FABA.2024.2.09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pablo Antolin & Stéphanie Payet & Juan Yermo, 2010. "Assessing Default Investment Strategies in Defined Contribution Pension Plans," OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends, OECD Publishing, vol. 2010(1), pages 87-115.
    2. Edward Whitehouse, 2007. "Pensions Panorama : Retirement-Income Systems in 53 Countries," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7177.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Butt, Adam & Khemka, Gaurav, 2015. "The effect of objective formulation on retirement decision making," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 385-395.
    2. Staveley-O’Carroll, James & Staveley-O’Carroll, Olena M., 2017. "Impact of pension system structure on international financial capital allocation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 1-22.
    3. Kirsten L. MacDonald & Robert J. Bianchi & Michael E. Drew, 2020. "Equity risk versus retirement adequacy: asset allocation solutions for KiwiSaver," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(4), pages 3851-3873, December.
    4. Grech, Aaron George, 2010. "Assessing the sustainability of pension reforms in Europe," MPRA Paper 27407, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Poteraj, Jarosław, 2007. "Systemy Emerytalne w Europie - Belgia [Pension systems in Europe - Belgium]," MPRA Paper 18415, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Robalino, David A. & Zylberstajn, Helio, 2009. "Ex-ante methods to assess the impact of social insurance policies on labor supply with an application to Brazil," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5027, The World Bank.
    7. Matsaganis Manos & Leventi Chrysa, 2011. "Pathways to a Universal Basic Pension in Greece," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Luković Stevan & Marinković Srđan, 2019. "Comparative Analysis of Retirement Benefits in Private Pension Funds and Public Pension System," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 57(2), pages 145-164, June.
    9. Andrey Kudryavtsev & Shosh Shahrabani & Yaniv Azoulay, 2017. "Frequency of Adjusting Asset Allocations in the Life-Cycle Pension Model: When Doing More Is Not Necessarily Better," Bulletin of Applied Economics, Risk Market Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 13-33.
    10. Queisser, Monika & Whitehouse, Edward, 2005. "Pensions at a glance: public policies across OECD countries," MPRA Paper 10907, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Wade D. Pfau, 2009. "How Representative are Representative Workers? An Assessment of the Hypothetical Workers Commonly Used in Social Security Studies," Journal of Income Distribution, Ad libros publications inc., vol. 18(2), pages 92-117, June.
    12. Dorfman, Mark & Hinz, Richard & Robalino, David, 2008. "The Financial Crisis and Mandatory Pension Systems in Developing Countries: Short- and Medium-term Responses," MPRA Paper 12254, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2008.
    13. Jarosław Poteraj, 2007. "Pension Systems in Europe. Case of Greece," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 1(3), September.
    14. Poteraj, Jarosław, 2008. "Systemy Emerytalne W Europie – Włochy [Pension Systems In Europe – Italy]," MPRA Paper 34645, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Poteraj, Jarosław, 2007. "Systemy emerytalne w Europie. Przypadek Grecji [Pension systems in Europe; Greece case]," MPRA Paper 21532, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Ade Ibiwoye & Lukman Ajijola, 2012. "An Actuarial Analysis of the Payout Options in Nigeria¡¯s Contributory Pension Scheme," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(6), pages 45-54, November.
    17. Holzmann, Robert & Pouget, Yann & Vodopivec, Milan & Weber, Michael, 2011. "Severance Pay Programs around the World: History, Rationale, Status, and Reforms," IZA Discussion Papers 5731, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Nicole Bäuerle & Ulrich Rieder, 2013. "Optimal Deterministic Investment Strategies for Insurers," Risks, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-18, November.
    19. Stefan Traub & Tim Krieger, 2009. "Wie hat sich die intragenerationale Umverteilung in der staatlichen Säule des Rentensystems verändert? Ein internationaler Vergleich auf Basis von LIS-Daten," LIS Working papers 520, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    20. Samia BENALLAH & Carole BONNET & Claire El MOUDDEN & Antoine MATH, 2012. "Comment Mesurer La "Générosité" Des Systèmes De Retraite ? Une Application Aux Pays De La Méditerranée," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 35, pages 215-234.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pension funds; Pension reforms; risks; CEE countries;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aan:journl:v:6:y:2024:i:2:p:206-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yanko Hristozov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ienwebg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.