No-envy in queueing problems

Citations

Cited by:

1. Youngsub Chun & Manipushpak Mitra & Suresh Mutuswami, 2017. "Reordering an existing queue," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 49(1), pages 65-87, June.
   • Youngsub Chun & Manipushpak Mitra & Suresh Mutuswami, 2013. "Reordering an existing queue," Discussion Papers in Economics 13/15, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
2. Kazuhiko Hashimoto & Hiroki Saitoh, 2012. "Strategy-proof and anonymous rule in queueing problems: a relationship between equity and efficiency," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 38(3), pages 473-480, March.
3. Gustavo Bergantiños & Silvia Lorenzo-Freire, 2008. "A characterization of optimistic weighted Shapley rules in minimum cost spanning tree problems," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 35(3), pages 523-538, June.
4. Sakai, Toyotaka, 2007. "Fairness and implementability in allocation of indivisible objects with monetary compensations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 549-563, June.
5. Yengin, Duygu & Chun, Youngsub, 2020. "No-envy, solidarity, and strategy-proofness in the queueing problem," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 87-97.
6. Erwin Ooghe, 2019. "Markets, Queues, and Taxes," CESifo Working Paper Series 7910, CESifo.
7. Ju, Yuan & Chun, Youngsub & van den Brink, René, 2014. "Auctioning and selling positions: A non-cooperative approach to queueing conflicts," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 33-45.
   • Yuan Ju & Youngsub Chun & Rene van den Brink, 2014. "Auctioning and Selling Positions: a noncooperative approach to queueing conflicts," Working Paper Series no91, Institute of Economic Research, Seoul National University.
   • Rene van den Brink & Youngsub Chun & Yuan Ju, 2014. "Auctioning and Selling Positions: A Non-cooperative Approach to Queuing Conflicts," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 14-016/II, Tinbergen Institute.
8. René Brink & Ilya Katsev & Gerard Laan, 2011. "Axiomatizations of two types of Shapley values for games on union closed systems," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 47(1), pages 175-188, May.
   • Rene van den Brink & Ilya Katsev & Gerard van der Laan, 2009. "Axiomatizations of Two Types of Shapley Values for Games on Union Closed Systems," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 09-064/1, Tinbergen Institute.
9. Chun, Youngsub & Mitra, Manipushpak, 2014. "Subgroup additivity in the queueing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 281-289.
10. Sambuddha Ghosh & Yan Long & Manipushpak Mitra, 2021. "Prior-free online mechanisms for queueing with arrivals," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(2), pages 671-700, September.
11. Duygu Yengin, 2017. "No-envy and egalitarian-equivalence under multi-object-demand for heterogeneous objects," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(1), pages 81-108, January.
    • Duygu Yengin, 2015. "No-Envy and Egalitarian-Equivalence under Multi-Object-Demand for Heterogeneous Objects," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 2015-10, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.
12. René Brink & Chris Dietz & Gerard Laan & Genjiu Xu, 2017. "Comparable characterizations of four solutions for permission tree games," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 63(4), pages 903-923, April.
    • René van den Brink & Chris Dietz & Gerard van der Laan & Genjiu Xu, 2015. "Comparable Characterizations of Four Solutions for Permission Tree Games," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-021/II, Tinbergen Institute.
13. Banerjee, Sreoshi, 2023. "Stability and fairness in sequencing games: optimistic approach and pessimistic scenarios," MPRA Paper 118680, University Library of Munich, Germany.
14. René Brink & P. Herings & Gerard Laan & A. Talman, 2015. "The Average Tree permission value for games with a permission tree," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 58(1), pages 99-123, January.
    • Rene van den Brink & Jean-Jacques Herings & Gerard van der Laan & Dolf Talman, 2012. "The Average Tree Permission Value for Games with a Permission Tree," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 13-023/II, Tinbergen Institute.
    • van den Brink, R. & van der Laan, G. & Herings, P.J.J. & Talman, A.J.J., 2015. "The Average Tree permission value for games with a permission tree," Other publications TiSEM 97042492-4b03-4e72-b88d-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    • van den Brink, J.R. & Herings, P.J.J. & van der Laan, G. & Talman, A.J.J., 2013. "The average tree permission value for games with a permission tree," Research Memorandum 001, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    • van den Brink, R. & Herings, P.J.J. & van der Laan, G. & Talman, A.J.J., 2013. "The Average Tree Permission Value for Games with a Permission Tree," Discussion Paper 2013-001, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    • van den Brink, R. & Herings, P.J.J. & van der Laan, G. & Talman, A.J.J., 2013. "The Average Tree Permission Value for Games with a Permission Tree," Other publications TiSEM 7f82484a-b6d8-4d2e-90cb-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
15. Youngsub Chun & Manipushpak Mitra & Suresh Mutuswami, 2014. "Egalitarian equivalence and strategyproofness in the queueing problem," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 56(2), pages 425-442, June.
    • Youngsup Chun & Manipushpak Mitra & Suresh Mutuswami, 2013. "Egalitarian Equivalence and Strategyproofness in the Queueing Problem," Working Paper Series no89, Institute of Economic Research, Seoul National University.
    • Youngsub Chun & Manipushpak Mitra & Suresh Mutuswami, 2013. "Egalitarian Equivalence And Strategyproofness In The Queueing Problem," Discussion Papers in Economics 13/16, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
16. Atay, Ata & Trudeau, Christian, 2024. "Queueing games with an endogenous number of machines," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 104-125.
    • Ata Atay & Christian Trudeau, 2022. "Queueing games with an endogenous number of machines," Papers 2207.07190, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    • Ata Atay & Christian Trudeau, 2022. "Queueing games with an endogenous number of machines," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2022/429, University of Barcelona School of Economics.
    • Ata Atay & Christian Trudeau, 2022. "Queueing games with an endogenous number of machines," Working Papers 2202, University of Windsor, Department of Economics.
17. Chun, Youngsub & Mitra, Manipushpak & Mutuswami, Suresh, 2019. "Egalitarianism in the queueing problem," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 48-56.
18. Yengin Duygu, 2012. "Characterizing Welfare-egalitarian Mechanisms with Solidarity When Valuations are Private Information," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-35, April.
    • Duygu Yengin, 2011. "Characterizing Welfare-egalitarian Mechanisms with Solidarity When Valuations are Private Information," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 2011-20, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.
19. Kazuhiko Hashimoto & Hiroki Saitoh, 2008. "Strategy-Proof and Anonymous Rule in Queueing Problems: A Relationship between Equity and Efficiency," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 08-17, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
20. KayI, Çagatay & Ramaekers, Eve, 2010. "Characterizations of Pareto-efficient, fair, and strategy-proof allocation rules in queueing problems," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 220-232, January.
    • RAMAEKERS, Eve & KAYI, Cagatay, 2008. "Characterizations of Pareto-efficient, fair, and strategy-proof allocation rules in queueing problems," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2008084, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    • KAYI, Cagatay & RAMAEKERS, Eve, 2010. "Characterizations of Pareto-efficient, fair, and strategy-proof allocation rules in queueing problems," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2179, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
21. Chun, Youngsub & Yengin, Duygu, 2017. "Welfare lower bounds and strategy-proofness in the queueing problem," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 462-476.
    • Youngsub Chun & Duygu Yengin, 2014. "Welfare Lower Bounds and Strategyproofness in the Queueing Problem," Working Paper Series no93, Institute of Economic Research, Seoul National University.
    • Duygu Yengin & Youngsub Chun, 2015. "Welfare Lower Bounds and Strategyproofness in the Queueing Problem," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 2015-11, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.
22. Bloch, Francis, 2017. "Second-best mechanisms in queuing problems without transfers:The role of random priorities," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 73-79.
23. Thomson, William, 2011. "Chapter Twenty-One - Fair Allocation Rules," Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, in: K. J. Arrow & A. K. Sen & K. Suzumura (ed.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 21, pages 393-506, Elsevier.
24. Parikshit De & Manipushpak Mitra, 2017. "Incentives and justice for sequencing problems," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 64(2), pages 239-264, August.
    • Mitra, Manipushpak & De, Parikshit, 2015. "Incentives and justice for sequencing problems," MPRA Paper 65447, University Library of Munich, Germany.
25. Andreas Darmann & Christian Klamler, 2014. "Knapsack cost sharing," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 18(3), pages 219-241, September.
26. Debasis Mishra & Bharath Rangarajan, 2007. "Cost sharing in a job scheduling problem," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 29(3), pages 369-382, October.
    • MISHRA, Debasis & RANGARAJAN, Bharath, 2005. "Cost sharing in a job scheduling problem," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2005053, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
27. William Thomson, 2007. "Children Crying at Birthday Parties. Why?," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 31(3), pages 501-521, June.
    • William Thomson, 2006. "Children crying at birthday parties. Why? Fairness and incentives for cake division problems," RCER Working Papers 526, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
28. René Brink & Gerard Laan & Valeri Vasil’ev, 2007. "Component efficient solutions in line-graph games with applications," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 33(2), pages 349-364, November.
29. Youngsub Chun, 2011. "Consistency and monotonicity in sequencing problems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 40(1), pages 29-41, February.
30. Chun, Youngsub & Mitra, Manipushpak & Mutuswami, Suresh, 2019. "A characterization of the symmetrically balanced VCG rule in the queueing problem," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 486-490.
31. Banerjee, Sreoshi & De, Parikshit & Mitra, Manipushpak, 2020. "A welfarist approach to sequencing problems with incentives," MPRA Paper 107188, University Library of Munich, Germany.
32. Kayi, C. & Ramaekers, E., 2008. "An impossibility in sequencing problems," Research Memorandum 040, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
33. Banerjee, Sreoshi, 2024. "On identifying efficient, fair and stable allocations in "generalized" sequencing games," MPRA Paper 120188, University Library of Munich, Germany.
34. René Brink & Youngsub Chun, 2012. "Balanced consistency and balanced cost reduction for sequencing problems," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 38(3), pages 519-529, March.
    • Rene van den Brink & Youngsub Chun, 2010. "Balanced Consistency and Balanced Cost Reduction for Sequencing Problems," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 10-035/1, Tinbergen Institute.
35. Chun, Youngsub & Mitra, Manipushpak & Mutuswami, Suresh, 2014. "Characterizations of pivotal mechanisms in the queueing problem," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 62-66.
36. De, Parikshit, 2013. "Incentive and normative analysis on sequencing problem," MPRA Paper 55127, University Library of Munich, Germany.