IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/oup/indcch/v9y2000i2p361-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Will New Information and Communication Technologies Improve the 'Codification' of Knowledge?

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Paulo Santos & Aurora A.C. Teixeira & Ana Brochado, 2006. "The ‘de-territorialisation of closeness’ - a typology of international successful R&D projects involving cultural and geographic proximity," FEP Working Papers 222, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
  2. Francesco Quatraro & Stefano Usai, 2017. "Are knowledge flows all alike? Evidence from European regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(8), pages 1246-1258, August.
  3. Antonelli, Cristiano, 2017. "Digital knowledge generation and the appropriability trade-off," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 991-1002.
  4. Viktoria Maria Baumeister & Leonie Petra Kuen & Maike Bruckes & Gerhard Schewe, 2021. "The Relationship of Work-Related ICT Use With Well-being, Incorporating the Role of Resources and Demands: A Meta-Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
  5. Vanessa Ratten & Paul Jones, 0. "New challenges in sport entrepreneurship for value creation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
  6. Kasper, Helmut & Lehrer, Mark & Mühlbacher, Jürgen & Müller, Barbara, 2013. "On the different “worlds” of intra-organizational knowledge management: Understanding idiosyncratic variation in MNC cross-site knowledge-sharing practices," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 326-338.
  7. Nooteboom, B. & Bogenrieder, I.M., 2003. "Change Of Routines: A Multi-Level Analysis," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2003-029-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
  8. Xu, Xu & Reed, Markum, 2021. "The impact of internet access on research output - a cross-country study," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
  9. Rosina Moreno & Ernest Miguélez, 2012. "A Relational Approach To The Geography Of Innovation: A Typology Of Regions," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 492-516, July.
  10. Quatraro, Francesco & Scandura, Alessandra, 2019. "Academic Inventors and the Antecedents of Green Technologies. A Regional Analysis of Italian Patent Data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 247-263.
  11. Andrea Bonaccorsi & Massimo Colombo & Massimiliano Guerini & Cristina Rossi-Lamastra, 2014. "The impact of local and external university knowledge on the creation of knowledge-intensive firms: evidence from the Italian case," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 261-287, August.
  12. Scaringella, Laurent & Burtschell, François, 2017. "The challenges of radical innovation in Iran: Knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity highlights — Evidence from a joint venture in the construction sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 151-169.
  13. Danielle Galliano & Pascale Roux, 2006. "Les inégalités spatiales dans l'usage des tic. Le cas des firmes industrielles françaises," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 57(6), pages 1449-1475.
  14. Karlheinz Krautz & Morten Thanning Vendelø, 2001. "Knowledge Sharing as Spontaneous Order: On the Emergence of Strong and Weak Ties," ROCK Working Papers 016, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised 12 Jun 2008.
  15. Simona Iammarino & Cecilia Jona-Lasinio & Susanna Mantegazza, 2005. "Productivity, Ict and Regional Disparities in Italy," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 3, July.
  16. Vanessa Ratten & Paul Jones, 2020. "New challenges in sport entrepreneurship for value creation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 961-980, September.
  17. Ammon J Salter & David M Gann, 2001. "The Role of Middle Range Publications in the Development of Engineering Knowledge," SPRU Working Paper Series 58, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
  18. Chathurani Silva & Sanjay Mathrani & Nihal Jayamaha, 2016. "The Impact Of Ict Usage On Collaborative Product Innovation Performance," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(05), pages 1-24, June.
  19. Dieter Ernst & Jan Fagerberg & Jarle Hildrum, 2002. "Do Global Production Networks and Digital Information Systems Make Knowledge Spatially Fluid?," Economics Study Area Working Papers 43, East-West Center, Economics Study Area.
  20. Stefano Brusoni & Keith Pavitt, 2003. "Problem solving and the co-ordination of innovative activities," SPRU Working Paper Series 93, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
  21. Robin Mansell, 2014. "Empowerment and/or disempowerment: the politics of digital media," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 56558, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
  22. Prencipe, Andrea & Tell, Fredrik, 2001. "Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1373-1394, December.
  23. Tommaso Ciarli & Roberta Rabellotti, 2004. "ICTs in Industrial Districts: An Empirical Analysis on Adoption, Use and Impact in the Biella Textile District," Working Papers 73, SEMEQ Department - Faculty of Economics - University of Eastern Piedmont.
  24. Emanuele Giovannetti & Karsten Neuhoff & Giancarlo Spagnolo, 2007. "Trust And Virtual Districts: Evidence From The Milan Internet Exchange," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 436-456, July.
  25. Eugenia Cacciatori, 2004. "Organisational Memory and Innovation Across Projects: Integrated Service Provision in Engineering Design Firms," SPRU Working Paper Series 117, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
  26. Elisabeth Nöhammer & Michaela Drexel, 2024. "The Potentials of Digital Workplace Health Promotion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(7), pages 1-24, July.
  27. Pee, L.G., 2018. "Affordances for sharing domain-specific and complex knowledge on enterprise social media," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 25-37.
  28. Piergiuseppe Morone & Richard Taylor, 2010. "Knowledge Diffusion and Innovation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13143.
  29. Ammon Salter & David Gann, 2001. "Sources of Ideas for Innovation in Engineering Design," SPRU Working Paper Series 74, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
  30. Juan Mateos Garcia & W. Edward Steinmueller, 2003. "Applying the Open Source Development Model to Knowledge Work," SPRU Working Paper Series 94, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
  31. Sadaf Bashir & Uwe Matzat & Bert Sadowski, 2014. "The Adoption of Information and Communication Technologies in the Design Sector and their impact on Firm Performance: Evidence from the Dutch Design Sector," Working Papers 14-01, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies, revised Feb 2014.
  32. Danielle Galliano & Luis Orozco, 2011. "The determinants of electronic traceability adoption: a firm‐level analysis of French agribusiness," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 379-397, June.
  33. Madudova, Emilia, 2016. "Toward of the spatiality of the Information and Communication Technologies sector: Case study from the Slovak Republic," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center (PRADEC), vol. 12(1), pages 1-13.
  34. Emilia Madudova, 2016. "Toward of the spatiality of the ICT sector: Case study from the Slovak Republic," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 12(1), pages 29-41, April.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.