IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/eee/respol/v32y2003i4p679-691.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

The emergence of S&T indicators: why did governments supplement statistics with indicators?

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Hamed Khatibi & Suzanne Wilkinson & Graham Eriwata & Lukuba N Sweya & Mostafa Baghersad & Heiman Dianat & Khaled Ghaedi & Ahad Javanmardi, 2022. "An integrated framework for assessment of smart city resilience," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(5), pages 1556-1577, June.
  2. Muniesa, Fabian & Linhardt, Dominique, 2011. "Trials of explicitness in the implementation of public management reform," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 550-566.
  3. Valeria Papponetti & Massimiano Bucchi, 2007. "Research Evaluation as a Policy Design Tool: Mapping Approaches across a Set of Case Studies," Working Papers 2007.75, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
  4. Eva Švandová & Michal Jirásek, 2019. "On Measuring Countries' Innovation Performance: Organisational Level Perspective," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 67(3), pages 871-881.
  5. van Aswegen, Mariske & Retief, Francois Pieter, 2020. "The role of innovation and knowledge networks as a policy mechanism towards more resilient peripheral regions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
  6. Judith Sutz, 2012. "Measuring innovation in developing countries: some suggestions to achieve more accurate and useful indicators," International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(1/2), pages 40-57.
  7. Grupp, Hariolf & Mogee, Mary Ellen, 2004. "Indicators for national science and technology policy: how robust are composite indicators?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1373-1384, November.
  8. Fabian Muniesa & Dominique Linhardt, 2009. "At stake with implementation: trials of explicitness in the description of the state," CSI Working Papers Series 015, Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation (CSI), Mines ParisTech.
  9. Janger, Jürgen & Schubert, Torben & Andries, Petra & Rammer, Christian & Hoskens, Machteld, 2017. "The EU 2020 innovation indicator: A step forward in measuring innovation outputs and outcomes?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 30-42.
  10. Török, Ádám, 2006. "Az európai felsőoktatás versenyképessége és a lisszaboni célkitűzések. Mennyire hihetünk a nemzetközi egyetemi rangsoroknak? [The competitiveness of Europes higher education and the Lisbon targets.," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(4), pages 310-329.
  11. Andrea Ramírez & Martin K. Patel & Kornelis Blok, 2011. "Monitoring Energy Use and Energy Efficiency in the Dutch Service Sector," Chapters, in: Raymond J.G.M. Florax & Henri L.F. de Groot & Peter Mulder (ed.), Improving Energy Efficiency through Technology, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  12. Montalvo, Carlos & Moghayer, Saeed, 2011. "State of an innovation system: theoretical and empirical advance towards an innovation efficiency index," MPRA Paper 38002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  13. Török, Ádám, 2009. "Társadalomtudományi tények és természettudományos módszerek [Social scientific facts and natural scientific techniques]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(12), pages 1067-1087.
  14. Fabian Muniesa & Dominique Linhardt, 2009. "At stake with implementation: trials of explicitness in the description of the state," CSI Working Papers Series 015, Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation (CSI), Mines ParisTech.
  15. Sabrina Petersohn & Thomas Heinze, 2018. "Professionalization of bibliometric research assessment. Insights from the history of the Leiden Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS)," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(4), pages 565-578.
  16. Mendonca, Sandro & Pereira, Tiago Santos & Godinho, Manuel Mira, 2004. "Trademarks as an indicator of innovation and industrial change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1385-1404, November.
  17. Chiara Franzoni & Christopher L. Simpkins & Baoli Li & Ashwin Ram, 2010. "Using content analysis to investigate the research paths chosen by scientists over time," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(1), pages 321-335, April.
  18. Gemici, Evrim & Gemici, Zafer, 2021. "A Comparative Study on Turkey’s Science and Technology (S&T) Indicators," OSF Preprints csyud, Center for Open Science.
  19. Papponetti, Valeria & Bucchi, Massimiano, 2007. "Research Evaluation as a Policy Design Tool: Mapping Approaches across a Set of Case Studies," Knowledge, Technology, Human Capital Working Papers 9093, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
  20. Pintar, Nico & Scherngell, Thomas, 2022. "The complex nature of regional knowledge production: Evidence on European regions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(8).
  21. Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2008. "Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 1-52.
  22. Tsao, J.Y. & Boyack, K.W. & Coltrin, M.E. & Turnley, J.G. & Gauster, W.B., 2008. "Galileo's stream: A framework for understanding knowledge production," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 330-352, March.
  23. Alina R. Kadyrova, 2015. "Approaches to Statistical Measurement of Advanced Technologies: A Comparative Study," HSE Working papers WP BRP 38/STI/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
  24. Kourtit, Karima & Nijkamp, Peter, 2018. "Big data dashboards as smart decision support tools for i-cities – An experiment on stockholm," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 24-35.
  25. Schwarzkopf, David L., 2014. "Identifying peer states to assess technology-based economic development," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 68-76.
  26. Motoyama, Yasuyuki, 2014. "Long-term collaboration between university and industry: A case study of nanotechnology development in Japan," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 39-51.
  27. Ji Han & Jiabin Liu, 2018. "Urban Spatial Interaction Analysis Using Inter-City Transport Big Data: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.
  28. Edward J Malecki, 2007. "Cities and Regions Competing in the Global Economy: Knowledge and Local Development Policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(5), pages 638-654, October.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.