IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/eee/respol/v25y1996i1p59-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Supplier involvement in automotive component design: are there really large US Japan differences?

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Kenji Kojima, 2000. "Japanese Supplier Relations: A Comparative Perspective," Kobe Economic & Business Review, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, vol. 44, pages 53-76, February.
  2. Ragatz, Gary L. & Handfield, Robert B. & Petersen, Kenneth J., 2002. "Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 389-400, May.
  3. V. Krishnan & Karl T. Ulrich, 2001. "Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(1), pages 1-21, January.
  4. Kozan, M. Kamil & Wasti, S. Nazli & Kuman, Ayca, 2006. "Management of buyer-supplier conflict: The case of the Turkish automotive industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 662-670, June.
  5. Donald Gerwin & Nicholas J. Barrowman, 2002. "An Evaluation of Research on Integrated Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(7), pages 938-953, July.
  6. McLaren, John, 1999. "Supplier relations and the market context: A theory of handshakes," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 121-138, June.
  7. Hwang, Sunil & Kim, Hyojin & Hur, Daesik & Schoenherr, Tobias, 2019. "Interorganizational information processing and the contingency effects of buyer-incurred uncertainty in a supplier's component development project," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 169-183.
  8. Wolfgang Becker & Jurgen Peters, 1998. "R&D-Competition Between Vertical Corporate Networks: Market Structure and Strategic R&D-Spillovers," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 51-72.
  9. Haus-Reve, Silje & Fitjar, Rune Dahl & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2019. "Does combining different types of collaboration always benefit firms? Collaboration, complementarity and product innovation in Norway," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1476-1486.
  10. Li, Hongmin & Wang, Yimin & Yin, Rui & Kull, Thomas J. & Choi, Thomas Y., 2012. "Target pricing: Demand-side versus supply-side approaches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 172-184.
  11. Tether, Bruce S., 2002. "Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 947-967, August.
  12. Erika Raquel Badillo & Francisco Llorente & Rosina Moreno, 2014. "“Cooperation in R&D, firm size and type of partnership: Evidence for the Spanish automotive industry”," IREA Working Papers 201430, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Nov 2014.
  13. Funk, Jeffrey L., 2003. "Standards, dominant designs and preferential acquisition of complementary assets through slight information advantages," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1325-1341, September.
  14. Adrienn Papp, 2019. "Innovation Cooperation: Buyer-Supplier Relations," Theory Methodology Practice (TMP), Faculty of Economics, University of Miskolc, vol. 15(01), pages 67-74.
  15. Bin Liu & Guohua Yang & Qi Zhang, 2020. "Pricing Decisions and Innovation Strategies Choice in Supply Chain with Competing Manufacturers and Common Supplier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-16, October.
  16. Lincoln, James R., 2009. "Strategic Alliances in the Japanese Economy: Types, Critiques, Embeddedness, and Change," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt87j3h103, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
  17. Wang, Changfeng & Hu, Qiying, 2020. "Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 94.
  18. Perrons, Robert K., 2009. "The open kimono: How Intel balances trust and power to maintain platform leadership," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 1300-1312, October.
  19. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2968 is not listed on IDEAS
  20. Jürgen Peters, 2000. "Buyer Market Power and Innovative Activities," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 16(1), pages 13-38, February.
  21. Laamanen, Tomi, 2005. "Dependency, resource depth, and supplier performance during industry downturn," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 125-140, March.
  22. Chung, Seungwha (Andy) & Kim, Gyeong Mook, 2003. "Performance effects of partnership between manufacturers and suppliers for new product development: the supplier's standpoint," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 587-603, April.
  23. Chen, Yi-Su & Su, Hung-Chung & Ro, Young K., 2017. "The co-evolution of supplier relationship quality and product quality in the U.S. auto industry: A cultural perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 245-255.
  24. Robert Suurmond & Finn Wynstra & Jan Dul, 2020. "Unraveling the Dimensions of Supplier Involvement and their Effects on NPD Performance: A Meta‐Analysis," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 56(3), pages 26-46, July.
  25. Mario Bourgault, 1997. "Industrie aérospatiale nord-américaine et performance des sous-traitants : Écarts entre le Canada et les États-Unis," CIRANO Working Papers 97s-26, CIRANO.
  26. Dragana Radicic & David Douglas & Geoff Pugh & Ian Jackson, 2019. "Cooperation For Innovation And Its Impact On Technological And Non-Technological Innovations: Empirical Evidence For European Smes In Traditional Manufacturing Industries," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(05), pages 1-41, June.
  27. Nigel Wadeson, 1999. "Two-way Communication Costs and the Boundaries of the Firm," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 301-329.
  28. Wong, Chee Yew & Boon-itt, Sakun, 2008. "The influence of institutional norms and environmental uncertainty on supply chain integration in the Thai automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 400-410, October.
  29. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Haus-Reve, Silje & Fitjar, Rune, 2019. "Does combining different types of collaboration always benefit firms? Collaboration, complementarity and product innovation in," CEPR Discussion Papers 13622, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  30. Genjiro Kosaka & Koichi Nakagawa & Seiji Manabe & Mizuki Kobayashi, 2020. "The vertical keiretsu advantage in the era of Westernization in the Japanese automobile industry: investigation from transaction cost economics and a resource-based view," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(1), pages 36-61, February.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.