IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/bla/stratm/v15y1994is2p167-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Chaos theory and strategy: Theory, application, and managerial implications

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Ramakrishnan Ramanathan & Usha Ramanathan & Katarzyna Pelc & Imke Hermens, 2024. "How Do Existing Organizational Theories Help in Understanding the Responses of Food Companies for Reducing Food Waste?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.
  2. Yi Zhang & Patrick Sik-Wah Fong & Daniel Yamoah Agyemang, 2021. "What Should Be Focused on When Digital Transformation Hits Industries? Literature Review of Business Management Adaptability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-30, December.
  3. Henkel, Joachim & Rønde, Thomas & Wagner, Marcus, 2015. "And the winner is—Acquired. Entrepreneurship as a contest yielding radical innovations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 295-310.
  4. Miguel Pina e Cunha & Ken Kamoche & Stewart R. Clegg, 2004. "Clues, cues and complexity: unpacking the concept of organizational surprise," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp453, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
  5. Aketch E. Ng’ong’a & Margaret Oloko & Charles M. Rambo & George Orwa, 2018. "Effect of Organizational Strategy on Performance of Companies Listed in Nairobi Securities Exchange in Kenya," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(5), pages 509-527, May.
  6. Pappas, Nikolaos & Caputo, Andrea & Pellegrini, Massimiliano Matteo & Marzi, Giacomo & Michopoulou, Eleni, 2021. "The complexity of decision-making processes and IoT adoption in accommodation SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 573-583.
  7. Alexander Flaig & Daniel Kindström & Mikael Ottosson, 2021. "Market-shaping phases—a qualitative meta-analysis and conceptual framework," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 354-374, December.
  8. Timothy Kiessling & Michael Harvey & Miriam Moeller, 2009. "Small and medium-sized firms top management teams’ decision making in global acquisitions," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 21(1), pages 95-117.
  9. Marcello Tonelli & Nicolò Cristoni, 2015. "Can GRI Light Up the Future of Mankind?," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 2503903, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
  10. Nowell Chidakwa & Prosper Lunga, 2021. "Theoretical reflections of complexity theory concepts and principles in understanding multiple vulnerabilities: an in-depth analysis," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(4), pages 79-84, April.
  11. Tammy E. Beck & Donde Ashmos Plowman, 2009. "Experiencing Rare and Unusual Events Richly: The Role of Middle Managers in Animating and Guiding Organizational Interpretation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 909-924, October.
  12. Agnieszka Dziubinska, 2018. "Understanding Complexity Leadership: Lesson From Emerging Environment (Przywodztwo w warunkach zlozonosci – doswiadczenia z dzialalnosci w warunkach rynkow wylaniajacych sie)," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(26), pages 155-172.
  13. Arianna Dal Forno & Ugo Merlone, 2021. "Envy effects on conflict dynamics in supervised work groups," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 44(2), pages 755-779, December.
  14. Whitby, Simon & Parker, David & Tobias, Andrew, 2001. "Non-linear dynamics and duopolistic competition: a R&D model and simulation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 179-191, March.
  15. Rønde, Thomas & Henkel, Joachim & Wagner, Marcus, 2010. "And the Winner Is--Acquired: Entrepreneurship as a Contest with Acquisition as the Prize," CEPR Discussion Papers 8147, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  16. Godfrey Cadogan, 2014. "Chaos in a Large System of Decision‐Makers with Heterogeneous Beliefs with Application to Index Option Prices," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 487-501, July.
  17. Giannoccaro, Ilaria, 2011. "Assessing the influence of the organization in the supply chain management using NK simulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 263-272, May.
  18. Goldsmith, Peter D. & Kane, Samuel, 2002. "The Farm Business Environment and New Generation Cooperatives as an Innovation Strategy," 2002 Annual Meeting, November 13 31826, NCERA-194 Research on Cooperatives.
  19. Deepika, S. & Veeresha, P., 2023. "Dynamics of chaotic waterwheel model with the asymmetric flow within the frame of Caputo fractional operator," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
  20. Mudassir Shams, 2024. "On a Stable Multiplicative Calculus-Based Hybrid Parallel Scheme for Nonlinear Equations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-29, November.
  21. Emily McDowell & Matthew Pepper & Albert Munoz Aneiros, 2023. "Towards a theory of self‐organizing supply chain clusters," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 88-100, January.
  22. Wagner, Marcus, 2007. "Determinants of the acquisition of smaller firms by larger incumbents in high-tech industries: Are they related to innovation and technology sourcing?," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2007-063, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
  23. Riggle, Charlene & Madey, Gregory, 1997. "An analysis of the impact of chaotic dynamics on management information flow models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 242-254, November.
  24. Franklin M. Lartey, 2020. "Chaos, Complexity, and Contingency Theories: A Comparative Analysis and Application to the 21st Century Organization," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(1), pages 44-51, April.
  25. Ni Li & Xiang Li & Yuzhong Shen & Zhuming Bi & Minghui Sun, 2015. "Risk assessment model based on multi-agent systems for complex product design," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 363-385, April.
  26. Haarhaus, Tim & Strunk, Guido & Liening, Andreas, 2020. "Assessing the complex dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A nonstationary approach," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
  27. Richard Makadok & Richard Burton & Jay Barney, 2018. "A practical guide for making theory contributions in strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1530-1545, June.
  28. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2007-063 is not listed on IDEAS
  29. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2008-055 is not listed on IDEAS
  30. Mary Han & Bill McKelvey, 2016. "How to Grow Successful Social Entrepreneurship Firms? Key Ideas from Complexity Theory," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(03), pages 243-280, September.
  31. David Wheeler & René Rechtman & Heike Fabig & Richard Boele, 2001. "Shell, Nigeria and the Ogoni. A study in unsustainable development: III. Analysis and implications of Royal Dutch|Shell group strategy," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(4), pages 177-196.
  32. J Foster, 2000. "Is There A Role For Transaction Cost Economics If We View Firms As Complex Adaptive Systems?," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 18(4), pages 369-385, October.
  33. Steensen, Elmer Fly, 2014. "Five types of organizational strategy," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 266-281.
  34. Mingers, John & White, Leroy, 2010. "A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1147-1161, December.
  35. Madureira Simaens, Ana, 2015. "Responding to complexity : A systems approach to strategy and interorganizational networks in the context of third sector organizations," Other publications TiSEM 84077bdb-a62a-478f-ba4e-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  36. Mudassir Shams & Nasreen Kausar & Ioana Alexandra Șomîtcă, 2024. "Efficient Multiplicative Calculus-Based Iterative Scheme for Nonlinear Engineering Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-26, November.
  37. Hung, Shih-Chang & Tu, Min-Fen, 2014. "Is small actually big? The chaos of technological change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1227-1238.
  38. Wouter C. Kersten & Nguyen H. Long & Jan Carel Diehl & Marcel R. M. Crul & Jo M. L. Van Engelen, 2017. "Comparing Performance of Biomass Gasifier Stoves: Influence of a Multi-Context Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-25, June.
  39. Goldman Geoff & Callaghan C.W., 2015. "A Holistic Synthesis of the Organisation Theories," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 7(4), pages 5-19, December.
  40. Wagner, Marcus, 2008. "Technology sourcing by large incumbents through acquisition of small firms," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2008-055, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
  41. Zhao, LiuWei & Chang, Jianwei & DU, Jianguo, 2019. "Dynamics analysis on competition between manufacturing and remanufacturing in context of government subsidies," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 119-128.
  42. Bill McKelvey, 1999. "Avoiding Complexity Catastrophe in Coevolutionary Pockets: Strategies for Rugged Landscapes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 294-321, June.
  43. William Rand & Roland T. Rust & Min Kim, 2018. "Complex systems: marketing’s new frontier," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(3), pages 111-127, December.
  44. Moncaleano, Carlos Javier Martínez, 2018. "Teoría del Caos y Estrategia Empresarial," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 19(1), pages 204-214, January.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.