IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/joinma/v7y2015i4p5-19n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Holistic Synthesis of the Organisation Theories

Author

Listed:
  • Goldman Geoff

    (University of Johannesburg, South Africa, Department of Business Management (Kingsway Campus), University of Johannesburg, PO Box 524, Auckland Park, 2006, Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa)

  • Callaghan C.W.

    (University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa)

Abstract

Much literature exists on the topic of ‘organisation’. Many different academic disciplinary areas stake their claim to aspects of business organisation. The social sciences offer many different perspectives of the phenomena associated with it; as different lenses, through which the object is perceived very differently. According to social constructivists, the business organisation is socially constructed. For psychologists, it exists at the nexus of individual human needs. For economists, the business organisation operates as a mechanism responding to signals of supply and demand. In this paper the business organisation is re-imaged as an entity existing within, and comprised of, chaotic systems. On the basis of a synthesis of seminal theory this paper attempts to offer a holistic perspective of business organisations; that ‘pulls together’ these multidisciplinary perspectives. On the basis of this synthesis, it is argued that the organisational context is inherently endogenous, and that qualitative research methods might offer management scientists a more valid perspective of the relationships within organisations than empirical methods can.

Suggested Citation

  • Goldman Geoff & Callaghan C.W., 2015. "A Holistic Synthesis of the Organisation Theories," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 7(4), pages 5-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:joinma:v:7:y:2015:i:4:p:5-19:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/joim-2015-0027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/joim-2015-0027
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/joim-2015-0027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Levy, 1994. "Chaos theory and strategy: Theory, application, and managerial implications," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(S2), pages 167-178, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laís Fajersztajn & Paulo Saldiva & Luiz Alberto Amador Pereira & Victor Figueiredo Leite & Anna Maria Buehler, 2017. "Short-term effects of fine particulate matter pollution on daily health events in Latin America: a systematic review and meta-analysis," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 62(7), pages 729-738, September.
    2. Patricia Frenz & Jay S. Kaufman & Carolina Nazzal & Gabriel Cavada & Francisco Cerecera & Nicolás Silva, 2017. "Mediation of the effect of childhood socioeconomic position by educational attainment on adult chronic disease in Chile," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 62(9), pages 1007-1017, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tammy E. Beck & Donde Ashmos Plowman, 2009. "Experiencing Rare and Unusual Events Richly: The Role of Middle Managers in Animating and Guiding Organizational Interpretation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 909-924, October.
    2. Pappas, Nikolaos & Caputo, Andrea & Pellegrini, Massimiliano Matteo & Marzi, Giacomo & Michopoulou, Eleni, 2021. "The complexity of decision-making processes and IoT adoption in accommodation SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 573-583.
    3. Arianna Dal Forno & Ugo Merlone, 2021. "Envy effects on conflict dynamics in supervised work groups," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 44(2), pages 755-779, December.
    4. Zhao, LiuWei & Chang, Jianwei & DU, Jianguo, 2019. "Dynamics analysis on competition between manufacturing and remanufacturing in context of government subsidies," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 119-128.
    5. Henkel, Joachim & Rønde, Thomas & Wagner, Marcus, 2015. "And the winner is—Acquired. Entrepreneurship as a contest yielding radical innovations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 295-310.
    6. Franklin M. Lartey, 2020. "Chaos, Complexity, and Contingency Theories: A Comparative Analysis and Application to the 21st Century Organization," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(1), pages 44-51, April.
    7. Wagner, Marcus, 2008. "Technology sourcing by large incumbents through acquisition of small firms," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2008-055, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    8. Bill McKelvey, 1999. "Avoiding Complexity Catastrophe in Coevolutionary Pockets: Strategies for Rugged Landscapes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 294-321, June.
    9. Mingers, John & White, Leroy, 2010. "A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1147-1161, December.
    10. Moncaleano, Carlos Javier Martínez, 2018. "Teoría del Caos y Estrategia Empresarial," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 19(1), pages 204-214, January.
    11. Whitby, Simon & Parker, David & Tobias, Andrew, 2001. "Non-linear dynamics and duopolistic competition: a R&D model and simulation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 179-191, March.
    12. Emily McDowell & Matthew Pepper & Albert Munoz Aneiros, 2023. "Towards a theory of self‐organizing supply chain clusters," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 88-100, January.
    13. William Rand & Roland T. Rust & Min Kim, 2018. "Complex systems: marketing’s new frontier," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(3), pages 111-127, December.
    14. Miguel Pina e Cunha & Ken Kamoche & Stewart R. Clegg, 2004. "Clues, cues and complexity: unpacking the concept of organizational surprise," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp453, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    15. Godfrey Cadogan, 2014. "Chaos in a Large System of Decision‐Makers with Heterogeneous Beliefs with Application to Index Option Prices," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 487-501, July.
    16. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2007-063 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Agnieszka Dziubinska, 2018. "Understanding Complexity Leadership: Lesson From Emerging Environment (Przywodztwo w warunkach zlozonosci – doswiadczenia z dzialalnosci w warunkach rynkow wylaniajacych sie)," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(26), pages 155-172.
    18. Rønde, Thomas & Henkel, Joachim & Wagner, Marcus, 2010. "And the Winner Is--Acquired: Entrepreneurship as a Contest with Acquisition as the Prize," CEPR Discussion Papers 8147, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Richard Makadok & Richard Burton & Jay Barney, 2018. "A practical guide for making theory contributions in strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1530-1545, June.
    20. Mary Han & Bill McKelvey, 2016. "How to Grow Successful Social Entrepreneurship Firms? Key Ideas from Complexity Theory," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(03), pages 243-280, September.
    21. Yi Zhang & Patrick Sik-Wah Fong & Daniel Yamoah Agyemang, 2021. "What Should Be Focused on When Digital Transformation Hits Industries? Literature Review of Business Management Adaptability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-30, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:joinma:v:7:y:2015:i:4:p:5-19:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.