IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v12y2024i22p3517-d1518549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient Multiplicative Calculus-Based Iterative Scheme for Nonlinear Engineering Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Mudassir Shams

    (Faculty of Engineering, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
    Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Riphah International University I-14, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

  • Nasreen Kausar

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Arts and Science, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul 34220, Türkiye)

  • Ioana Alexandra Șomîtcă

    (Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Automation and Computer Science, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Baritiu Street, no 26–28, 40027 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

It is essential to solve nonlinear equations in engineering, where accuracy and precision are critical. In this paper, a novel family of iterative methods for finding the simple roots of nonlinear equations based on multiplicative calculus is introduced. Based on theoretical research, a novel family of simple root-finding schemes based on multiplicative calculus has been devised, with a convergence order of seven. The symmetry in the pie graph of the convergence–divergence areas demonstrates that the method is stable and consistent when dealing with nonlinear engineering problems. An extensive examination of the numerical results of the engineering applications is presented in order to assess the effectiveness, stability, and consistency of the recently established method in comparison to current methods. The analysis includes the total number of functions and derivative evaluations per iteration, elapsed time, residual errors, local computational order of convergence, and error graphs, which demonstrate our method’s better convergence behavior when compared to other approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Mudassir Shams & Nasreen Kausar & Ioana Alexandra Șomîtcă, 2024. "Efficient Multiplicative Calculus-Based Iterative Scheme for Nonlinear Engineering Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-26, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:22:p:3517-:d:1518549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/22/3517/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/12/22/3517/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali Özyapıcı & Zehra B. Sensoy & Tolgay Karanfiller, 2016. "Effective Root-Finding Methods for Nonlinear Equations Based on Multiplicative Calculi," Journal of Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-7, October.
    2. Mudassir Shams & Bruno Carpentieri, 2023. "On Highly Efficient Fractional Numerical Method for Solving Nonlinear Engineering Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-30, December.
    3. David Levy, 1994. "Chaos theory and strategy: Theory, application, and managerial implications," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(S2), pages 167-178, June.
    4. Mudassir Shams & Nasreen Kausar & Cuauhtã‰Moc Samaniego & Praveen Agarwal & Shams Forruque Ahmed & Shaher Momani, 2023. "On Efficient Fractional Caputo-Type Simultaneous Scheme For Finding All Roots Of Polynomial Equations With Biomedical Engineering Applications," FRACTALS (fractals), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 31(04), pages 1-15.
    5. Hossein Jafari & Roghayeh Moallem Ganji & Davood Domiri Ganji & Zakia Hammouch & Yusif S. Gasimov, 2023. "A Novel Numerical Method For Solving Fuzzy Variable-Order Differential Equations With Mittag-Leffler Kernels," FRACTALS (fractals), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 31(04), pages 1-13.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mudassir Shams, 2024. "On a Stable Multiplicative Calculus-Based Hybrid Parallel Scheme for Nonlinear Equations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-29, November.
    2. Tammy E. Beck & Donde Ashmos Plowman, 2009. "Experiencing Rare and Unusual Events Richly: The Role of Middle Managers in Animating and Guiding Organizational Interpretation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(5), pages 909-924, October.
    3. Pappas, Nikolaos & Caputo, Andrea & Pellegrini, Massimiliano Matteo & Marzi, Giacomo & Michopoulou, Eleni, 2021. "The complexity of decision-making processes and IoT adoption in accommodation SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 573-583.
    4. Arianna Dal Forno & Ugo Merlone, 2021. "Envy effects on conflict dynamics in supervised work groups," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 44(2), pages 755-779, December.
    5. Zhao, LiuWei & Chang, Jianwei & DU, Jianguo, 2019. "Dynamics analysis on competition between manufacturing and remanufacturing in context of government subsidies," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 119-128.
    6. Henkel, Joachim & Rønde, Thomas & Wagner, Marcus, 2015. "And the winner is—Acquired. Entrepreneurship as a contest yielding radical innovations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 295-310.
    7. Franklin M. Lartey, 2020. "Chaos, Complexity, and Contingency Theories: A Comparative Analysis and Application to the 21st Century Organization," Journal of Business Administration Research, Journal of Business Administration Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(1), pages 44-51, April.
    8. Mudassir Shams & Bruno Carpentieri, 2023. "On Highly Efficient Fractional Numerical Method for Solving Nonlinear Engineering Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-30, December.
    9. Wagner, Marcus, 2008. "Technology sourcing by large incumbents through acquisition of small firms," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2008-055, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    10. Bill McKelvey, 1999. "Avoiding Complexity Catastrophe in Coevolutionary Pockets: Strategies for Rugged Landscapes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 294-321, June.
    11. Mingers, John & White, Leroy, 2010. "A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1147-1161, December.
    12. Moncaleano, Carlos Javier Martínez, 2018. "Teoría del Caos y Estrategia Empresarial," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 19(1), pages 204-214, January.
    13. Whitby, Simon & Parker, David & Tobias, Andrew, 2001. "Non-linear dynamics and duopolistic competition: a R&D model and simulation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(3), pages 179-191, March.
    14. Emily McDowell & Matthew Pepper & Albert Munoz Aneiros, 2023. "Towards a theory of self‐organizing supply chain clusters," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 88-100, January.
    15. William Rand & Roland T. Rust & Min Kim, 2018. "Complex systems: marketing’s new frontier," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(3), pages 111-127, December.
    16. Miguel Pina e Cunha & Ken Kamoche & Stewart R. Clegg, 2004. "Clues, cues and complexity: unpacking the concept of organizational surprise," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp453, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    17. Godfrey Cadogan, 2014. "Chaos in a Large System of Decision‐Makers with Heterogeneous Beliefs with Application to Index Option Prices," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 487-501, July.
    18. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2007-063 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Agnieszka Dziubinska, 2018. "Understanding Complexity Leadership: Lesson From Emerging Environment (Przywodztwo w warunkach zlozonosci – doswiadczenia z dzialalnosci w warunkach rynkow wylaniajacych sie)," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(26), pages 155-172.
    20. Rønde, Thomas & Henkel, Joachim & Wagner, Marcus, 2010. "And the Winner Is--Acquired: Entrepreneurship as a Contest with Acquisition as the Prize," CEPR Discussion Papers 8147, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    21. Richard Makadok & Richard Burton & Jay Barney, 2018. "A practical guide for making theory contributions in strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1530-1545, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:12:y:2024:i:22:p:3517-:d:1518549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.