IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/bla/eufman/v16y2010i1p27-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

The Cross†Section of Expected Stock Returns: What Have We Learnt from the Past Twenty†Five Years of Research?

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Tariq Aziz & Valeed Ahmad Ansari, 2017. "Idiosyncratic volatility and stock returns: Indian evidence," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1420998-142, January.
  2. Jacobs, Heiko, 2015. "What explains the dynamics of 100 anomalies?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 65-85.
  3. Peng-Chia Chiu & Timothy D. Haight, 2020. "Investor learning, earnings signals, and stock returns," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 671-698, February.
  4. Tony Guida & Guillaume Coqueret, 2019. "Ensemble Learning Applied to Quant Equity: Gradient Boosting in a Multifactor Framework," Post-Print hal-02311104, HAL.
  5. Bellavite Pellegrini, Carlo & Romelli, Davide & Sironi, Emiliano, 2011. "The impact of governance and productivity on stock returns in European industrial companies," MPRA Paper 104654, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2011.
  6. Turan G. Bali & Nusret Cakici & Robert F. Whitelaw, 2013. "Hybrid Tail Risk and Expected Stock Returns: When Does the Tail Wag the Dog?," NBER Working Papers 19460, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  7. Christian Walkshäusl & Sebastian Lobe, 2014. "The Alternative Three†Factor Model: An Alternative beyond US Markets?," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 20(1), pages 33-70, January.
  8. Michael Dempsey, 2015. "Stock Markets, Investments and Corporate Behavior:A Conceptual Framework of Understanding," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number p1007, August.
  9. Auer, Benjamin R. & Rottmann, Horst, 2019. "Have capital market anomalies worldwide attenuated in the recent era of high liquidity and trading activity?," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 61-79.
  10. Dionysia Dionysiou, 2015. "Choosing Among Alternative Long-Run Event-Study Techniques," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 158-198, February.
  11. Paul Calluzzo & Fabio Moneta & Selim Topaloglu, 2019. "When Anomalies Are Publicized Broadly, Do Institutions Trade Accordingly?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(10), pages 4555-4574, October.
  12. Johan Knif & James W. Kolari & Gregory Koutmos & Seppo Pynnönen, 2019. "Measuring the relative return contribution of risk factors," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(4), pages 263-272, July.
  13. Sainan Jin & Liangjun Su & Yonghui Zhang, 2015. "Nonparametric testing for anomaly effects in empirical asset pricing models," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 9-36, February.
  14. Jacobs, Heiko, 2016. "Market maturity and mispricing," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 270-287.
  15. Gikas Hardouvelis & Georgios Papanastasopoulos & Dimitrios Thomakos & Tao Wang, 2012. "External Financing, Growth and Stock Returns," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 18(5), pages 790-815, November.
  16. Galvani, Valentina & Faychuk, Vita, 2022. "The Mean-Variance Core of Cryptocurrencies: When More is Not Better," Working Papers 2022-4, University of Alberta, Department of Economics.
  17. Neenu C & T Mohamed Nishad, 2022. "Behavior of Financial Markets Around News Announcements: A Review Based on Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Fields," The Review of Finance and Banking, Academia de Studii Economice din Bucuresti, Romania / Facultatea de Finante, Asigurari, Banci si Burse de Valori / Catedra de Finante, vol. 14(2), pages 143-172, December.
  18. Andrei Salem Gonçalves & Robert Aldo Iquiapaza & Aureliano Angel Bressan, 2012. "Latent Fundamentals Arbitrage with a Mixed Effects Factor Model," Brazilian Review of Finance, Brazilian Society of Finance, vol. 10(3), pages 317-335.
  19. Wang, Nianling & Zhang, Mingzhi & Zhang, Yuan, 2024. "Return prediction: A tree-based conditional sort approach with firm characteristics," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
  20. Kei Nakagawa & Takumi Uchida & Tomohisa Aoshima, 2018. "Deep Factor Model," Papers 1810.01278, arXiv.org.
  21. Fabian T. Lutzenberger, 2015. "Multifactor Models and their Consistency with the ICAPM: Evidence from the European Stock Market," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 21(5), pages 1014-1052, November.
  22. Werner Gleißner & Thomas Günther & Christian Walkshäusl, 2022. "Financial sustainability: measurement and empirical evidence," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 467-516, April.
  23. Bo Li & Qian Sun & Changyun Wang, 2014. "Liquidity, Liquidity Risk and Stock Returns: Evidence from Japan," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 20(1), pages 126-151, January.
  24. Geertsema, Paul & Lu, Helen, 2020. "The correlation structure of anomaly strategies," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
  25. Richard Chung & Scott Fung & Jayendu Patel, 2015. "Alpha–beta–churn of equity picks by institutional investors and the robust superiority of hedge funds," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 363-405, August.
  26. Ramiah, Vikash & Xu, Xiaoming & Moosa, Imad A., 2015. "Neoclassical finance, behavioral finance and noise traders: A review and assessment of the literature," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 89-100.
  27. Xyngis, Georgios, 2017. "Business-cycle variation in macroeconomic uncertainty and the cross-section of expected returns: Evidence for scale-dependent risks," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 43-65.
  28. Kumari, Jyoti & Mahakud, Jitendra & Hiremath, Gourishankar S., 2017. "Determinants of idiosyncratic volatility: Evidence from the Indian stock market," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 172-184.
  29. Hjalmarsson, Erik & Manchev, Petar, 2012. "Characteristic-based mean-variance portfolio choice," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 1392-1401.
  30. Alexander Kempf & Christoph Merkle & Alexandra Niessen†Ruenzi, 2014. "Low Risk and High Return – Affective Attitudes and Stock Market Expectations," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 20(5), pages 995-1030, November.
  31. Faruque, Muhammad U, 2011. "An empirical investigation of the arbitrage pricing theory in a frontier stock market: evidence from Bangladesh," MPRA Paper 38675, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  32. Dimitrios Koutmos, 2015. "Is there a Positive Risk†Return Tradeoff? A Forward†Looking Approach to Measuring the Equity Premium," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 21(5), pages 974-1013, November.
  33. Anginer, Deniz & Ray, Sugata & Seyhun, H. Nejat & Xu, Luqi, 2024. "Expensive anomalies," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
  34. Samuel YM Ze‐To, 2022. "Fundamental index aligned and excess market return predictability," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 592-614, April.
  35. Jacobs, Heiko & Müller, Sebastian, 2020. "Anomalies across the globe: Once public, no longer existent?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 213-230.
  36. Alizadeh, Amir H. & Muradoglu, Gulnur, 2014. "Stock market efficiency and international shipping-market information," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 445-461.
  37. Fletcher, Jonathan, 2018. "Betas V characteristics: Do stock characteristics enhance the investment opportunity set in U.K. stock returns?," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 114-129.
  38. Kyosev, Georgi & Hanauer, Matthias X. & Huij, Joop & Lansdorp, Simon, 2020. "Does earnings growth drive the quality premium?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
  39. Insana, Alessandra, 2022. "Does systematic risk change when markets close? An analysis using stocks’ beta," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
  40. Tian, Mary, 2018. "Tradability of output, business cycles and asset prices," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 86-102.
  41. Kei Nakagawa & Masaya Abe & Junpei Komiyama, 2019. "A Robust Transferable Deep Learning Framework for Cross-sectional Investment Strategy," Papers 1910.01491, arXiv.org.
  42. DeMiguel, Victor & Martin-Utrera, Alberto & Nogales, Francisco J. & Uppal, Raman, 2017. "A Portfolio Perspective on the Multitude of Firm Characteristics," CEPR Discussion Papers 12417, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  43. Galvani, Valentina & Gubellini, Stefano, 2013. "Mean–variance dominant trading strategies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 142-150.
  44. Amit Goyal, 2012. "Empirical cross-sectional asset pricing: a survey," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 26(1), pages 3-38, March.
  45. Benjamin R. Auer, 2019. "Does the strength of capital market anomalies exhibit seasonal patterns?," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 43(1), pages 91-103, January.
  46. Gunduz Caginalp & Mark DeSantis, 2019. "Nonlinear price dynamics of S&P 100 stocks," Papers 1907.04422, arXiv.org.
  47. Richardson, Scott & Tuna, Irem & Wysocki, Peter, 2010. "Accounting anomalies and fundamental analysis: A review of recent research advances," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 410-454, December.
  48. Mary Tian, 2015. "Tradability of Output, Business Cycles, and Asset Prices," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2015-3, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
  49. Rapach, David & Zhou, Guofu, 2013. "Forecasting Stock Returns," Handbook of Economic Forecasting, in: G. Elliott & C. Granger & A. Timmermann (ed.), Handbook of Economic Forecasting, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 328-383, Elsevier.
  50. Stadtmüller, Immo & Auer, Benjamin R. & Schuhmacher, Frank, 2022. "On the benefits of active stock selection strategies for diversified investors," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 342-354.
  51. Ali Fayyaz Munir & Mohd Edil Abd. Sukor & Shahrin Saaid Shaharuddin, 2022. "Adaptive Market Hypothesis and Time-varying Contrarian Effect: Evidence From Emerging Stock Markets of South Asia," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
  52. Ben Sita, Bernard, 2018. "Estimating the beta-return relationship by considering the sign and the magnitude of daily returns," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 28-35.
  53. Olivier Ledoit & Michael Wolf, 2014. "Nonlinear shrinkage of the covariance matrix for portfolio selection: Markowitz meets Goldilocks," ECON - Working Papers 137, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Feb 2017.
  54. Jonathan Fletcher, 2017. "An Empirical Examination of the Incremental Contribution of Stock Characteristics in UK Stock Returns," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-19, October.
  55. Skočir, Matevž & Lončarski, Igor, 2018. "Multi-factor asset pricing models: Factor construction choices and the revisit of pricing factors," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 65-80.
  56. Caginalp, Gunduz & DeSantis, Mark, 2020. "Nonlinear price dynamics of S&P 100 stocks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 547(C).
  57. Ananjan Bhattacharyya & Abhijeet Chandra, 2016. "The Cross-section of Expected Returns on Penny Stocks: Are Low-hanging Fruits Not-so Sweet?," Papers 1610.01338, arXiv.org.
  58. Masaya Abe & Hideki Nakayama, 2018. "Deep Learning for Forecasting Stock Returns in the Cross-Section," Papers 1801.01777, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2018.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.