Updating stochastic choice
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Drew Fudenberg & Philipp Strack & Tomasz Strzalecki, 2018.
"Speed, Accuracy, and the Optimal Timing of Choices,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(12), pages 3651-3684, December.
- Drew Fudenberg & Philipp Strack & Tomasz Strzalecki, 2015. "Speed, Accuracy, and the Optimal Timing of Choices," Working Paper 254346, Harvard University OpenScholar.
- Drew Fudenberg & David K. Levine & Zacharias Maniadis, 2012.
"On the Robustness of Anchoring Effects in WTP and WTA Experiments,"
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 4(2), pages 131-145, May.
- Drew Fudenberg & David K Levine & Zacharias Maniadis, 2010. "On the Robustness of Anchoring Effects in WTP and WTA Experiments," Levine's Working Paper Archive 661465000000000312, David K. Levine.
- Maniadis, Zacharias & Levine, David K. & Fudenberg, Drew, 2012. "On the Robustness of Anchoring Effects in WTP and WTA Experiments," Scholarly Articles 11005333, Harvard University Department of Economics.
- Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Nick Netzer, 2021.
"Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences When Choices Are Noisy,"
Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(6), pages 1828-1877.
- Alós-Ferrer, Carlos & Fehr, Ernst & Netzer, Nick, 2021. "Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences When Choices Are Noisy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 129(6), pages 1828-1877.
- Alós-Ferrer, Carlos & Fehr, Ernst & Netzer, Nick, 2018. "Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences When Choices Are Noisy," IZA Discussion Papers 11918, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Nick Netzer, 2018. "Time will tell: recovering preferences when choices are noisy," ECON - Working Papers 306, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jun 2020.
- Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Nick Netzer, 2018. "Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences when Choices Are Noisy," CESifo Working Paper Series 7333, CESifo.
- Carlos Alos-Ferrer & Ernst Fehr & Nick Netzer, 2018. "Time will tell - Recovering Preferences when Choices are Noisy," Papers 1811.02497, arXiv.org.
- Andrew Caplin & Daniel Martin, 2015.
"A Testable Theory of Imperfect Perception,"
Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 125(582), pages 184-202, February.
- Andrew Caplin & Daniel Martin, 2011. "A Testable Theory of Imperfect Perception," NBER Working Papers 17163, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Andrew Caplin & Daniel Martin, 2013. "A Testable Theory of Imperfect Perception," Levine's Working Paper Archive 786969000000000649, David K. Levine.
- Andrew Caplin & Daniel Martin, 2015. "A Testable Theory of Imperfect Perception," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01155313, HAL.
- Andrew Caplin & Daniel Martin, 2015. "A Testable Theory of Imperfect Perception," Post-Print halshs-01155313, HAL.
- Michael L. Platt & Paul W. Glimcher, 1999. "Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 400(6741), pages 233-238, July.
- Daniel McFadden, 2001.
"Economic Choices,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(3), pages 351-378, June.
- McFadden, Daniel L., 2000. "Economic Choices," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2000-6, Nobel Prize Committee.
- Camillo Padoa-Schioppa & John A. Assad, 2006. "Neurons in the orbitofrontal cortex encode economic value," Nature, Nature, vol. 441(7090), pages 223-226, May.
- Adrian Bruhin & Ernst Fehr & Daniel Schunk, 2019.
"The many Faces of Human Sociality: Uncovering the Distribution and Stability of Social Preferences,"
Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(4), pages 1025-1069.
- Adrian Bruhin & Ernst Fehr & Daniel Schunk, 2016. "The Many Faces of Human Sociality: Uncovering the Distribution and Stability of Social Preferences," Working Papers 1603, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, revised 01 Feb 2016.
- Adrian Bruhin & Ernst Fehr & Daniel Schunk, 2018. "The Many Faces of Human Sociality: Uncovering the Distribution and Stability of Social Preferences," CESifo Working Paper Series 7240, CESifo.
- Adrian Bruhin & Ernst Fehr & Daniel Schunk, 2018. "The Many Faces of Human Sociality: Uncovering the Distribution and Stability of Social Preferences," Working Papers 2018-079, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
- Adrian Bruhin & Ernst Fehr & Daniel Schunk, 2016. "The Many Faces of Human Sociality: Uncovering the Distribution and Stability of Social Preferences," CESifo Working Paper Series 5744, CESifo.
- Adrian Bruhin & Ernst Fehr & Daniel Schunk, 2016. "The Many Faces of Human Sociality:Uncovering the Distribution and Stability of Social Preferences," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 16.01, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
- Bruhin, Adrian & Fehr, Ernst & Schunk, Daniel, 2018. "The Many Faces of Human Sociality: Uncovering the Distribution and Stability of Social Preferences," IZA Discussion Papers 11815, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Sébastien Ballesta & Weikang Shi & Katherine E. Conen & Camillo Padoa-Schioppa, 2020. "Values encoded in orbitofrontal cortex are causally related to economic choices," Nature, Nature, vol. 588(7838), pages 450-453, December.
- repec:cup:judgdm:v:10:y:2015:i:1:p:34-49 is not listed on IDEAS
- Costa-Gomes, Miguel & Crawford, Vincent P & Broseta, Bruno, 2001.
"Cognition and Behavior in Normal-Form Games: An Experimental Study,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 69(5), pages 1193-1235, September.
- Miguel Costa-Gomes & Vincent P. Crawford & Bruno Broseta, "undated". "Cognition and Behavior in Normal-Form Games:An Experimental Study," Discussion Papers 00/45, Department of Economics, University of York.
- Broseta, Bruno & Costa-Gomes, Miguel & Crawford, Vincent P., 2000. "Cognition and Behavior in Normal-Form Games: An Experimental Study," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt0fp8278k, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
- Costa-Gomes, Miguel & Crawford, Vincent P. & Broseta, Bruno, 1998. "Cognition and Behavior in Normal-Form Games: An Experimental Study," University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series qt1vn4h7x5, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
- Zacharias Maniadis & Fabio Tufano & John A. List, 2014.
"One Swallow Doesn't Make a Summer: New Evidence on Anchoring Effects,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(1), pages 277-290, January.
- Zacharias Maniadis & Fabio Tufano & John A List, 2013. "One Swallow Doesn't Make a Summer: New Evidence on Anchoring Effects," Discussion Papers 2013-07, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Zacharias Maniadis & Fabio Tufano & John List, 2013. "One Swallow Does not Make a Summer: New Evidence on Anchoring Effects," Levine's Working Paper Archive 786969000000000824, David K. Levine.
- repec:hal:pseose:halshs-01155313 is not listed on IDEAS
- Drew Fudenberg & Tomasz Strzalecki, 2015.
"Dynamic Logit With Choice Aversion,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 83, pages 651-691, March.
- Drew Fudenberg & Tomasz Strzalecki, "undated". "Dynamic Logit with Choice Aversion," Working Paper 40033, Harvard University OpenScholar.
- Fudenberg, Drew & Strzalecki, Tomasz, 2015. "Dynamic Logit with Choice Aversion," Scholarly Articles 14397609, Harvard University Department of Economics.
- Charles Bellemare & Sabine Kröger & Arthur van Soest, 2008.
"Measuring Inequity Aversion in a Heterogeneous Population Using Experimental Decisions and Subjective Probabilities,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 815-839, July.
- Bellemare, C. & Kroger, S. & van Soest, A.H.O., 2008. "Measuring inequity aversion in a heterogeneous population using experimental decisions and subjective probabilities," Other publications TiSEM f17bda32-98f9-4580-ab3f-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Andrew Caplin & Mark Dean, 2008. "Dopamine, Reward Prediction Error, and Economics," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 123(2), pages 663-701.
- Anna Conte & John D. Hey & Peter G. Moffatt, 2018.
"Mixture models of choice under risk,"
World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Experiments in Economics Decision Making and Markets, chapter 1, pages 3-12,
World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
- Conte, Anna & Hey, John D. & Moffatt, Peter G., 2011. "Mixture models of choice under risk," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 162(1), pages 79-88, May.
- Anna Conte & John D Hey & Peter G Moffatt, 2007. "Mixture Models of Choice Under Risk," Discussion Papers 07/06, Department of Economics, University of York.
- Faruk Gul & Wolfgang Pesendorfer, 2006.
"Random Expected Utility,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 121-146, January.
- F. Gul & W. Pesendorfer, 2002. "Random Expected Utility," Princeton Economic Theory Working Papers 497768e9b9fc18361ac0810b3, David K. Levine.
- Adrian Bruhin & Helga Fehr-Duda & Thomas Epper, 2010.
"Risk and Rationality: Uncovering Heterogeneity in Probability Distortion,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1375-1412, July.
- Adrian Bruhin & Helga Fehr-Duda & Thomas Epper, 2007. "Risk and Rationality: Uncovering Heterogeneity in Probability Distortion," SOI - Working Papers 0705, Socioeconomic Institute - University of Zurich, revised Jul 2007.
- Carlo Baldassi & Simone Cerreia-Vioglio & Fabio Maccheroni & Massimo Marinacci & Marco Pirazzini, 2020. "A Behavioral Characterization of the Drift Diffusion Model and Its Multialternative Extension for Choice Under Time Pressure," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(11), pages 5075-5093, November.
- Andrew Caplin & Mark Dean & Paul W. Glimcher & Robb B. Rutledge, 2010. "Measuring Beliefs and Rewards: A Neuroeconomic Approach," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 125(3), pages 923-960.
- John G. Cross, 1973. "A Stochastic Learning Model of Economic Behavior," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 87(2), pages 239-266.
- Brocas, Isabelle & Carrillo, Juan D., 2012. "From perception to action: An economic model of brain processes," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 81-103.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Duffy, Sean & Smith, John, 2020. "An economist and a psychologist form a line: What can imperfect perception of length tell us about stochastic choice?," MPRA Paper 99417, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Duffy, Sean & Gussman, Steven & Smith, John, 2021. "Visual judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in stochastic choice?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
- Duffy, Sean & Gussman, Steven & Smith, John, 2019. "Judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in choice?," MPRA Paper 93126, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Breitmoser, Yves, 2018. "The Axiomatic Foundation of Logit," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 78, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
- Daniel Serra, 2021.
"Decision-making: from neuroscience to neuroeconomics—an overview,"
Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 91(1), pages 1-80, July.
- Daniel Serra, 2021. "Decision-making: From neuroscience to neuroeconomics - An overview," Post-Print hal-03256719, HAL.
- Jack Vromen, 2011. "Neuroeconomics: two camps gradually converging: what can economics gain from it?," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 58(3), pages 267-285, September.
- Mira Frick & Ryota Iijima & Tomasz Strzalecki, 2019.
"Dynamic Random Utility,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(6), pages 1941-2002, November.
- Mira Frick & Ryota Iijima & Tomasz Strzalecki, 2017. "Dynamic Random Utility," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2092R, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University, revised Nov 2018.
- Mira Frick & Ryota Iijima & Tomasz Strzalecki, 2017. "Dynamic Random Utility," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2092, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
- Glimcher, Paul W. & Tymula, Agnieszka A., 2023.
"Expected subjective value theory (ESVT): A representation of decision under risk and certainty,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 110-128.
- Glimcher, Paul W. & Tymula, Agnieszka A., 2016. "Expected Subjective Value Theory (ESVT): A Representation of Decision Under Risk and Certainty," Working Papers 2016-08, University of Sydney, School of Economics, revised Jan 2017.
- Etilé, Fabrice & Frijters, Paul & Johnston, David W. & Shields, Michael A., 2021.
"Measuring resilience to major life events,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 598-619.
- Etilé, Fabrice & Frijters, Paul & Johnston, David W. & Shields, Michael A., 2021. "Measuring resilience to major life events," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112526, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Ryan Webb & Paul W. Glimcher & Kenway Louie, 2021. "The Normalization of Consumer Valuations: Context-Dependent Preferences from Neurobiological Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 93-125, January.
- S. Cerreia-Vioglio & F. Maccheroni & M. Marinacci & A. Rustichini, 2017.
"Multinomial logit processes and preference discovery: inside and outside the black box,"
Working Papers
615, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
- Simone Cerreia-Vioglio & Fabio Maccheroni & Massimo Marinacci & Aldo Rustichini, 2020. "Multinomial logit processes and preference discovery: inside and outside the black box," Papers 2004.13376, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.
- Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Johannes Buckenmaier, 2021.
"Cognitive sophistication and deliberation times,"
Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(2), pages 558-592, June.
- Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Johannes Buckenmaier, 2018. "Cognitive sophistication and deliberation times," ECON - Working Papers 292, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Apr 2019.
- Caplin, Andrew, 2014. "Rational inattention and revealed preference: The data-theoretic approach to economic modeling," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 295-305.
- Despoina Alempaki & Emina Canic & Timothy L. Mullett & William J. Skylark & Chris Starmer & Neil Stewart & Fabio Tufano, 2019. "Reexamining How Utility and Weighting Functions Get Their Shapes: A Quasi-Adversarial Collaboration Providing a New Interpretation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(10), pages 4841-4862, October.
- Fehr, Ernst & Epper, Thomas & Senn, Julien, 2022. "Other-Regarding Preferences and Redistributive Politics," IZA Discussion Papers 15088, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Fehr, Ernst & Schmidt, Klaus M., 2010.
"On inequity aversion: A reply to Binmore and Shaked,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 101-108, January.
- Fehr, Ernst & Schmidt, Klaus M., 2009. "On Inequity Aversion - A Reply to Binmore and Shaked," Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems 256, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
- Fehr, Ernst & Schmidt, Klaus M., 2010. "On inequity aversion: A reply to Binmore and Shaked," Munich Reprints in Economics 20653, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
- Charles Bellemare & Alexander Sebald, 2019.
"Measuring Belief-Dependent Preferences without Information about Beliefs,"
CESifo Working Paper Series
7505, CESifo.
- Bellemare, Charles & Sebald, Alexander, 2019. "Measuring Belief-Dependent Preferences without Information about Beliefs," IZA Discussion Papers 12153, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Fehr Ernst & Epper Thomas & Senn Julien, 2020.
"Social preferences and redistributive politics,"
ECON - Working Papers
339, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Aug 2023.
- Ernst Fehr & Thomas Epper & Julien Senn, 2022. "Social Preferences and Redistributive Politics," CESifo Working Paper Series 9545, CESifo.
- Ernst Fehr & Thomas Epper & Julien Senn, 2022. "Other-regarding Preferences and Redistributive Politics," Working Papers hal-03506826, HAL.
- Ernst Fehr & Thomas Epper & Julien Senn, 2023. "Social Preferences and Redistributive Politics," Working Papers 2023-iRisk-05, IESEG School of Management.
- Ernst Fehr & Thomas Epper & Julien Senn, 2023. "Social Preferences and Redistributive Politics," Working Papers hal-04362830, HAL.
- Adrian Bruhin & Maha Manai & Luís Santos-Pinto, 2022.
"Risk and rationality: The relative importance of probability weighting and choice set dependence,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 139-184, October.
- Adrian Bruhin & Maha Manai & Luis Santos-Pinto, 2018. "Risk and Rationality:The Relative Importance of Probability Weighting and Choice Set Dependence," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 18.04, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
- Adrian Bruhin & Maha Manai & Luis Santos-Pinto, 2019. "Risk and Rationality:The Relative Importance of Probability Weighting and Choice Set Dependence," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 19.05, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
- Bruhin, Adrian & Janizzi, Kelly & Thöni, Christian, 2020.
"Uncovering the heterogeneity behind cross-cultural variation in antisocial punishment,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 291-308.
- Adrian Bruhin & Kelly Janizzi & Christian Thöni, 2019. "Uncovering the Heterogeneity behind Cross-Cultural Variation in Antisocial Punishment," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 19.08, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
More about this item
Keywords
Stochastic preferences; Bayesian learning; logit choice; reinforcement; neuroeconomic theory;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
- D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-CWA-2021-04-05 (Central and Western Asia)
- NEP-DCM-2021-04-05 (Discrete Choice Models)
- NEP-MIC-2021-04-05 (Microeconomics)
- NEP-ORE-2021-04-05 (Operations Research)
- NEP-UPT-2021-04-05 (Utility Models and Prospect Theory)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zur:econwp:381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Severin Oswald (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seizhch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.