IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/zeswps/082001.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Maastricht als Herausforderung und Chance: Die Auswirkungen der europäischen Integration auf den italienischen Wohlfahrtsstaat

Author

Listed:
  • Gohr, Antonia

Abstract

Das Papier fragt nach den Auswirkungen der europäischen Integration auf den nationalen Wohlfahrtsstaat am Beispiel der italienischen Sozialpolitik seit 1992. Der italienische Wohlfahrtsstaat hat in den 90er Jahren einschneidende Reformen erfahren. Neben den vielen internen Herausforderungen erhöhten insbesondere die im Maastrichter Vertrag vereinbarten wirtschaftspolitischen Zielgrößen den politisch-ökonomischen Problemdruck auf den Sozialstaat. Die 1990er Jahre bieten sich daher für eine Untersuchung besonders an. Die Maastrichter Konvergenzkriterien stellten für die italienische Sozialpolitik einerseits Zwänge dar, andererseits ermöglichten sie aber in dem fragmentierten Parteiensystem Italiens Reformen, die zuvor an der Schwäche und Kurzlebigkeit zahlreicher Vielparteienregierungen gescheitert waren. Die europäische Integration wirkte damit gleichsam als 'Modernisierungspeitsche'. Ergänzt und verstärkt wurde dieser externe Druck durch interne Ereignisse, wie den Zusammenbruch des Parteiensystems und das Erscheinen neuer politischer Akteure. Die internationalen Einflußfaktoren sollen daher auf Wechselwirkungen mit innenpolitischen Determinanten der Sozialstaatstätigkeit untersucht werden. Zwar konzentriert sich diese Untersuchung auf den italienischen Wohlfahrtsstaat. Sie zielt jedoch auch darauf ab, zum Verständnis der Faktoren und Umstände der Auswirkungen der europäischen Integration auf nationale Wohlfahrtsstaaten allgemein einen Beitrag zu leisten.

Suggested Citation

  • Gohr, Antonia, 2001. "Maastricht als Herausforderung und Chance: Die Auswirkungen der europäischen Integration auf den italienischen Wohlfahrtsstaat," Working papers of the ZeS 08/2001, University of Bremen, Centre for Social Policy Research (ZeS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:zeswps:082001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/41504/1/559656483.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weaver, R. Kent, 1986. "The Politics of Blame Avoidance," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 371-398, October.
    2. Merkel, Wolfgang, 1994. "Italien: das Phantom der "2. Republik"," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 23(4), pages 293-304.
    3. Joachim Volz, 1996. "Italiens wirtschaftliche Entwicklung im Zeichen tiefgreifender Reformen - Annäherung an die fiskalischen Referenzwerte zur Teilnahme an der Europäischen Währungsunion?," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 63(48), pages 776-784.
    4. Elmar Rieger & Stephan Leibfried, 1998. "Welfare State Limits to Globalization," Politics & Society, , vol. 26(3), pages 363-390, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schludi, Martin, 2001. "The politics of pensions in European social insurance countries," MPIfG Discussion Paper 01/11, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. Sommer, Jörg, 2007. "The open method of co-ordination: Some remarks regarding old-age security within an enlarged European Union," Working papers of the ZeS 02/2003, University of Bremen, Centre for Social Policy Research (ZeS).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anders Gustafsson, 2019. "Busy doing nothing: why politicians implement inefficient policies," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 282-299, September.
    2. Henrik Serup Christensen & Lauri Rapeli, 2021. "Immediate rewards or delayed gratification? A conjoint survey experiment of the public’s policy preferences," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 63-94, March.
    3. Sofia Vasilopoulou & Daphne Halikiopoulou & Theofanis Exadaktylos, 2014. "Greece in Crisis: Austerity, Populism and the Politics of Blame," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 388-402, March.
    4. Schimank, Uwe & Stucke, Andreas (ed.), 1994. "Coping with Trouble: How Science Reacts to Political Disturbances of Research Conditions," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 14, number 14.
    5. Livia Johannesson & Noomi Weinryb, 2021. "How to blame and make a difference: perceived responsibility and policy consequences in two Swedish pro-migrant campaigns," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 54(1), pages 41-62, March.
    6. Sten Hansson, 2018. "The discursive micro-politics of blame avoidance: unpacking the language of government blame games," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(4), pages 545-564, December.
    7. Burmeister, Larry L., 2000. "Dismantling Statist East Asian Agricultures? Global Pressures and National Responses," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 443-455, March.
    8. Zohlnhöfer, Reimut, 1999. "Der lange Schatten der schönen Illusion: Finanzpolitik nach der deutschen Einheit, 1990 - 1998," Working papers of the ZeS 09/1999, University of Bremen, Centre for Social Policy Research (ZeS).
    9. Argenton, Cédric & Potters, Jan & Yang, Yadi, 2023. "Receiving credit: On delegation and responsibility," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    10. Yoshio Iida & Christiane Schwieren, 2016. "Contributing for Myself, but Free riding for My Group?," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 17(1), pages 36-47, February.
    11. Daniel Beland & Patrik Marier, 2004. "The Politics of Protest Avoidance: Policy Windows, Labor Mobilization, and Pension Reform in France," Social and Economic Dimensions of an Aging Population Research Papers 114, McMaster University.
    12. Céline Bourbousson, 2017. "Institutionalisation of a participatory instrument : An explanatory model drawing on the theory of institutional logics," Post-Print hal-01896800, HAL.
    13. Kang, Minah & Reich, Michael R., 2014. "Between credit claiming and blame avoidance: The changing politics of priority-setting for Korea's National Health Insurance System," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 9-17.
    14. Daugbjerg, Carsten & Svendsen, Gert Tinggaard, 2001. "Designing green taxes in a political context: From optimal to feasible environmental regulation," Working Papers 01-17, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Economics.
    15. Andong, Sandrine & Ongolo, Symphorien, 2020. "From global forest governance to domestic politics: The European forest policy reforms in Cameroon," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    16. Elizabeth B Lozano & Sean M Laurent, 2019. "The effect of admitting fault versus shifting blame on expectations for others to do the same," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Katharina Böhm & Claudia Landwehr & Nils Steiner, 2017. "What Explains Generosity in the Public Financing of High-Tech Drugs? An Empirical Investigation for 25 OECD Countries and 11 Controversial Drugs," Working Papers 1708, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    18. Jan Orbie & Viktor Opsomer & Yentyl Williams & Sarah Delputte & Joren Verschaeve, 2021. "Shielded against risk? European donor co‐ordination in Palestine," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 39(5), pages 703-720, September.
    19. Adolph, Christopher & Greer, Scott L. & Massard da Fonseca, Elize, 2012. "Allocation of authority in European health policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(9), pages 1595-1603.
    20. Svallfors, Stefan, 2015. "Politics as organized combat: New players and new rules of the game in Sweden," MPIfG Discussion Paper 15/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:zeswps:082001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zesbrde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.