IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzbpep/fsii00403.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Verteilungsgerechtigkeit in der internationalen Umweltpolitik: Theoretische Fundierung und exemplarische Formulierung

Author

Listed:
  • Helm, Carsten
  • Simonis, Udo E.

Abstract

Fragen der internationalen Verteilungsgerechtigkeit sind beileibe nicht neu. Man denke nur an die Forderung der Entwicklungsländer aus den siebziger Jahren nach einer Neuen Weltwirtschaftsordnung, die auf eine gerechtere Verteilung der Vorteile aus der internationalen Arbeitsteilung abzielte. Verlangt wurden damals verbesserte Exportmöglichkeiten in die Industrieländer, erhöhte finanzielle und technologische Transferleistungen sowie eine verstärkte Mitbestimmung in den internationalen Institutionen, vor allem in der Weltbank und im Internationalen Währungsfonds. Auch wenn diese Forderungen weitgehend unerfüllt blieben und die Debatte um eine Neue Weltwirtschaftsordnung kaum noch geführt wird, gibt es zu Beginn des neuen Jahrhunderts eine Reihe höchst aktueller Gründe, warum das Thema der internationalen Verteilungsgerechtigkeit wieder stärker in den Vordergrund rückt. Viele dieser Gründe hängen mit dem Phänomen der „Globalisierung“ zusammen.

Suggested Citation

  • Helm, Carsten & Simonis, Udo E., 2000. "Verteilungsgerechtigkeit in der internationalen Umweltpolitik: Theoretische Fundierung und exemplarische Formulierung," Discussion Papers, Research Professorship Environmental Policy FS II 00-403, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbpep:fsii00403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/49578/1/31473239X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carsten Helm, 2000. "Economic Theories of International Environmental Cooperation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2038.
    2. William R. Cline, 1992. "Economics of Global Warming, The," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 39, April.
    3. Chichilnisky, Graciela & Thomson, William, 1987. "The walrasian mechanism from equal division is not monotonic with respect to variations in the number of consumers," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 119-124, February.
    4. Varian, Hal R., 1974. "Equity, envy, and efficiency," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 63-91, September.
    5. Nordhaus, William D & Yang, Zili, 1996. "A Regional Dynamic General-Equilibrium Model of Alternative Climate-Change Strategies," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(4), pages 741-765, September.
    6. Simonis, Udo E., 1996. "Steuern, joint implementation, Zertifikate: zum Instrumentarium der Weltumweltpolitik," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 102-118.
    7. Moulin, Herve, 1992. "An Application of the Shapley Value to Fair Division with Money," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 60(6), pages 1331-1349, November.
    8. Helm, Carsten & Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim, 1998. "Wissenschaftliche Aussagen zum Klimawandel - Zum politischen Umgang," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 33647, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Weidner, Helmut, 2005. "Global equity versus public interest? The case of climate change policy in Germany," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Civil Society and Transnational Networks SP IV 2005-102, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    2. Simonis, Udo E., 2007. "Environmental Change + Environmental Politics: 13 Review Articles [Umwelt-Wandel + Umwelt-Politik: 13 Besprechungsaufsätze]," Discussion Papers, Presidential Department P 2008-001, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Elvers, Horst-Dietrich, 2005. "Umweltgerechtigkeit (Environmental Justice): Integratives Paradigma der Gesundheits- und Sozialwissenschaften?," UFZ Discussion Papers 14/2005, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:sae:envval:v:10:y:2001:i:1:p:5-18 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Helm, Carsten & Simonis, Udo E., 2000. "Distributive justice in international environmental policy - theoretical foundation and exemplary formulation," Discussion Papers, Research Professorship Environmental Policy FS II 00-404, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Matthias Schmidt & Hermann Held & Elmar Kriegler & Alexander Lorenz, 2013. "Climate Policy Under Uncertain and Heterogeneous Climate Damages," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 54(1), pages 79-99, January.
    4. Nordhaus, William, 2013. "Integrated Economic and Climate Modeling," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 1069-1131, Elsevier.
    5. Kverndokk, Snorre & Rose, Adam, 2008. "Equity and Justice in Global Warming Policy," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 2(2), pages 135-176, October.
    6. Havranek, Tomas & Irsova, Zuzana & Janda, Karel & Zilberman, David, 2015. "Selective reporting and the social cost of carbon," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 394-406.
    7. Roger Fouquet, 2012. "Economics of Energy and Climate Change: Origins, Developments and Growth," Working Papers 2012-08, BC3.
    8. Thirupathi Rao & Siti Indati Mustapa, 2020. "A Review of Climate Economic Models in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Gjerde, Jon & Grepperud, Sverre & Kverndokk, Snorre, 1999. "Optimal climate policy under the possibility of a catastrophe," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3-4), pages 289-317, August.
    10. DeCanio, Stephen J., 2009. "The political economy of global carbon emissions reductions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 915-924, January.
    11. Dalton, Michael & O'Neill, Brian & Prskawetz, Alexia & Jiang, Leiwen & Pitkin, John, 2008. "Population aging and future carbon emissions in the United States," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 642-675, March.
    12. M. Germain & V. van Steenberghe, 2003. "Constraining Equitable Allocations of Tradable CO 2 Emission Quotas by Acceptability," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 26(3), pages 469-492, November.
    13. Roman Inderst & Eftichios Sartzetakis & Anastasios Xepapadeas, 2021. "Technical Report on Sustainability and Competition," DEOS Working Papers 2103, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    14. Toman, Michael & Shogren, Jason, 2000. "Climate Change Policy," RFF Working Paper Series dp-00-22, Resources for the Future.
    15. Kurtze, Christiane & Springer, Katrin, 1999. "Modelling the economic impact of global warming in a general equilibrium framework," Kiel Working Papers 922, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    16. Wei, Yi-Ming & Mi, Zhi-Fu & Huang, Zhimin, 2015. "Climate policy modeling: An online SCI-E and SSCI based literature review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 57(PA), pages 70-84.
    17. Claudia Kemfert & Richard Tol, 2002. "Equity, international trade and climate policy," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 23-48, March.
    18. Döll, Sebastian, 2009. "Climate change impacts in computable general equilibrium models: An overview," HWWI Research Papers 1-26, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWI).
    19. Berger, Loïc & Emmerling, Johannes, 2017. "Welfare as Simple(x) Equity Equivalents," MITP: Mitigation, Innovation and Transformation Pathways 254044, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    20. Carlos Ciscar, Juan & Soria, Antonio, 2000. "Economic convergence and climate policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(11), pages 749-761, September.
    21. Adam Rose & Brandt Stevens, 1998. "A Dynamic Analysis of Fairness in Global Warming Policy: Kyoto, Buenos Aires, and Beyond," Journal of Applied Economics, Universidad del CEMA, vol. 1, pages 329-362, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzbpep:fsii00403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.