IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wzblpe/fsi97204.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluierung und Arbeitsmarktpolitik: Eine analytischer Bezugsrahmen am Beispiel des arbeitsmarktpolitischen Rahmenprogramms in Berlin

Author

Listed:
  • Schmid, Günther
  • Schömann, Klaus
  • Schütz, Holger

Abstract

Die vorliegende Studie entwickelt einen analytischen Bezugsrahmen für eine idealtypische Evaluierung der Arbeitsmarktpolitik. Zur Illustration dient das Arbeitsmarktpolitische Rahmenprogramm der Berliner Landesregierung. Dabei standen die vom Europäischen Sozialfonds kofinanzierten Qualifizierungsprogramme im Vordergrund. In einem Bezugsrahmen wird noch keine eigentliche Evaluierung vorgenommen. Es werden lediglich die zentralen Fragen entwickelt, die wichtigen Begriffe (wie Mitnahme, Verdrängung, Substitution, tangible und intangible Kosten) definiert, die möglichen Methoden und Verfahren diskutiert sowie die entsprechenden Datenvoraussetzungen für eine umfassende Evaluierung genannt. Da und dort werden jedoch einzelne Schritte beispielhaft ausgeführt, und an manchen Stellen werden Vermutungen geäußert, um die Art der erwarteten Informationen oder Argumente zu verdeutlichen. Theoretische oder praktische Beispiele sowie Literaturhinweise geben Anregungen zur weiteren Vertiefung und Anwendung. Es werden fünf Etappen eines vollständigen Evaluierungsprozesses der Arbeitsmarktpolitik unterschieden und ausgeführt: (1) Kontextanalyse, (2) Problemanalyse, (3) Monitoring, (4) Wirkungsanalyse und (5) Nutzen-Kosten- Analyse.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmid, Günther & Schömann, Klaus & Schütz, Holger, 1997. "Evaluierung und Arbeitsmarktpolitik: Eine analytischer Bezugsrahmen am Beispiel des arbeitsmarktpolitischen Rahmenprogramms in Berlin," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment FS I 97-204, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wzblpe:fsi97204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/43922/1/231945558.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hoevenberg, J. & van de Loo, P. & van der Velden, R.K.W., 1994. "Instruments for analysing skills shortages," ROA Working Paper 5E, Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA).
    2. Ashenfelter, Orley C, 1978. "Estimating the Effect of Training Programs on Earnings," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 60(1), pages 47-57, February.
    3. Entorf, Horst, 1995. "Strukturelle Arbeitslosigkeit : Ergebnisse einer Mismatch-Analyse," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 24113, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    4. Günther Schmid & Jacqueline O’Reilly & Klaus Schömann (ed.), 1996. "International Handbook of Labour Market Policy and Evaluation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 955.
    5. Stephen H. Bell & Larry l. Orr & John D. Blomquist & Glen G. Cain, 1995. "Program Applicants as a Comparison Group in Evaluating Training Programs: Theory and a Test," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number pacg, December.
    6. Kurt Geppert & Dieter Vesper, 1995. "Länderfusion begünstigt Entwicklung: wirtschaftliche und finanzpolitische Aspekte einer Vereinigung von Berlin und Brandenburg," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 62(10), pages 215-227.
    7. David A. Long & Charles D. Mallar & Craig Thornton, 1981. "Evaluating the Benefits and Costs of the Job Corps," Mathematica Policy Research Reports ba3a91e82f5f43b48bab18ea4, Mathematica Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Burt S. Barnow & Jeffrey Smith, 2015. "Employment and Training Programs," NBER Chapters, in: Economics of Means-Tested Transfer Programs in the United States, Volume 2, pages 127-234, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Katherine Baicker & Theodore Svoronos, 2019. "Testing the Validity of the Single Interrupted Time Series Design," NBER Working Papers 26080, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Maria Cancian & Daniel R. Meyer & Robert Wood, "undated". "Final Impact Findings from the Child Support Noncustodial Parent Employment Demonstration (CSPED)," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 93c8996bb09444a292e2598d2, Mathematica Policy Research.
    4. Orley Ashenfelter & David E. Bloom & Gordon B. Dahl, 2013. "Lawyers as Agents of the Devil in a Prisoner's Dilemma Game," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 10(3), pages 399-423, September.
    5. Paul Ryan, 2001. "The School-to-Work Transition: A Cross-National Perspective," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 39(1), pages 34-92, March.
    6. Cansino Muñoz-Repiso, José Manuel & Sánchez Braza, Antonio, 2011. "Effectiveness of Public Training Programs Reducing the Time Needed to Find a Job/Eficacia de los programas públicos de formación en la reducción del tiempo necesario para encontrar un empleo," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 29, pages 391(26á.)-3, Abril.
    7. Christopher J. O'Leary & Alena Nesporova & Alexander Samorodov, 2001. "Manual on Evaluation of Labour Market Policies in Transition Economies," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number cjo2001, December.
    8. Steven Raphael & Michael A. Stoll, 2006. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Massachusetts Workforce Development System Using No-Shows as a Nonexperimental Comparison Group," Evaluation Review, , vol. 30(4), pages 379-429, August.
    9. Michael Lechner, 2000. "An Evaluation of Public-Sector-Sponsored Continuous Vocational Training Programs in East Germany," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 35(2), pages 347-375.
    10. Katherine Baicker & Theodore Svoronos, 2019. "Testing the Validity of the Single Interrupted Time Series Design," CID Working Papers 364, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    11. Carneiro, Pedro & Heckman, James J., 2003. "Human Capital Policy," IZA Discussion Papers 821, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Denis Anne, 2019. "Aides à la mobilité et insertion sociale," Erudite Ph.D Dissertations, Erudite, number ph19-03 edited by Yannick L'Horty.
    13. Raaum, Oddbjorn & Torp, Hege, 2002. "Labour market training in Norway--effect on earnings," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 207-247, April.
    14. Robert J. LaLonde, 2003. "Employment and Training Programs," NBER Chapters, in: Means-Tested Transfer Programs in the United States, pages 517-586, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Harrison Hong & Ilan Kremer & Jeffrey D. Kubik & Jianping Mei & Michael Moses, 2015. "Ordering, revenue and anchoring in art auctions," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 46(1), pages 186-216, March.
    16. Raúl Junior Sandoval-Gómez & Jesús Antonio Álvarez-Cedillo & Edgar Ivan Castellanos-Sanchez & Teodoro Álvarez-Sánchez & Rebeca Perez-Garcia, 2023. "Development of a technological innovation and social entrepreneurship training program to generate services in a Mexican public entity," Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 6(13 (126)), pages 74-87, December.
    17. Angrisani, Marco & Atella, Vincenzo & Brunetti, Marianna, 2018. "Public health insurance and household portfolio Choices: Unravelling financial “Side Effects” of Medicare," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 198-212.
    18. Matias Busso & Patrick Kline, 2008. "Do Local Economic Development Programs Work? Evidence from the Federal Empowerment Zone Program," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1639, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    19. Scott A. Imberman, 2011. "Achievement and Behavior in Charter Schools: Drawing a More Complete Picture," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 93(2), pages 416-435, May.
    20. David Card, 2022. "Design-Based Research in Empirical Microeconomics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(6), pages 1773-1781, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wzblpe:fsi97204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzbbbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.